Confirmed Trade: [VAN/CGY] Elias Lindholm for Andrei Kuzmenko, Hunter Brzustewicz, Joni Jurmo, 2024 1st, cond. 2024 4th

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Dont like giving up Hunter but I would imagine the Canucks have a plan on resigning Lindholm. Glad we did not give up one of Willander, Lekkerimaki, Hoglander or Podkolzin though.

Fair deal for both sides - Canucks going all in.
 
Gonna be real interesting how this effects Noah Hanifin’s mindset. Does he now let the Flames know, he’ll be moving on, and they then put him back on the market?

If so, he can be gone over the weekend as well.

Pretty sure Hanifin has said all along that he wants to be traded to a team willing to compensate a contract + contend
 
Very happy with this. 1st, decent prospect, usable player. 4th and the other D seem like long shots but more the merrier.
 
He was the guy I really wanted to get from Vancouver. Their fans undervalue him.
We don't, it's not a fit for us, like Kuz is under Tocchet. He is phenomenal in the O zone, but skating and defense are major hurdles right now. I think Kuz is the big piece, I think he can bounce back for 30G if you let him play.
 
Jurmo sucks... and the 4th is conditional
to say 5 assets for a UFA is a bit disingenuous

In real talk, Calgary got a late 1st round pick and a A- prospect with the value of about a late 1st round pick and a player with negative value due to contract....

Fair value. Go win your cup
 
  • Like
Reactions: VintageBure
People calling this a "haul" for CGY clearly don't follow the Canucks or their system. The only value CGY got here was the 1st. Which is projecting to be a very late 27-32 range pick. The rest are throw ins. This was the very definition of quantity over quality for CGY. But the optics they will spin from a PR stand point for people who don't know anything about the players. I think CGY could have done better and almost certainly would have if they'd waited.
Seems like rentals, without an extension typically get a late 1st and a good, but not great prospect, no? I don't think it's a "haul", but it seems pretty typical to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Raistlin
People calling this a "haul" for CGY clearly don't follow the Canucks or their system. The only value CGY got here was the 1st. Which is projecting to be a very late 27-32 range pick. The rest are throw ins. This was the very definition of quantity over quality for CGY. But the optics they will spin from a PR stand point for people who don't know anything about the players. I think CGY could have done better and almost certainly would have if they'd waited.

this is a throw-in?





feels like cope
 
People calling this a "haul" for CGY clearly don't follow the Canucks or their system. The only value CGY got here was the 1st. Which is projecting to be a very late 27-32 range pick. The rest are throw ins. This was the very definition of quantity over quality for CGY. But the optics they will spin from a PR stand point for people who don't know anything about the players. I think CGY could have done better and almost certainly would have if they'd waited.
I don’t think you can consider a guy who nearly leads his junior league in points as a dman in his D + 1 a “throw in” as flawed as he may be. I think it’s a fair deal for both teams.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad