Trocheck is banged up and it goes both ways. If you screw over a guy that should be in the mix multiple times and then return to him when he has pushed through the hurdles to be at the top of the list don't be surprised when he blows you off in return.
I get frustrated with a lot of guys turning them down. Trocheck can do so until he feels like playing after what USA hockey did to him a couple of times.
The problem with making excuses for a guy like Trocheck is that USAH needs to draw a line in the sand. Is Trocheck legitimately banged up and needs rest? Maybe. He’d also get 3+ weeks off before the tournament. But he declined the invite, for the 4th year running, and he should be held accountable for that by USAH. It’s the risk a player takes by not playing when they’re available. If you always put it off for next year, you may end up with a legitimate excuse (injury, nhl playoffs, wedding kid, etc.) and now you’re chronically absent.
Trocheck’s a great player, but right now he’s a great player that couldn’t apparently care less about representing USAH. That should be a consideration when the time comes and the tournament matters enough to interest him.
Trocheck is banged up and it goes both ways. If you screw over a guy that should be in the mix multiple times and then return to him when he has pushed through the hurdles to be at the top of the list don't be surprised when he blows you off in return.
I get frustrated with a lot of guys turning them down. Trocheck can do so until he feels like playing after what USA hockey did to him a couple of times.
The problem with making excuses for a guy like Trocheck is that USAH needs to draw a line in the sand. Is Trocheck legitimately banged up and needs rest? Maybe. He’d also get 3+ weeks off before the tournament. But he declined the invite, for the 4th year running, and he should be held accountable for that by USAH. It’s the risk a player takes by not playing when they’re available. If you always put it off for next year, you may end up with a legitimate excuse (injury, nhl playoffs, wedding kid, etc.) and now you’re chronically absent.
Trocheck’s a great player, but right now he’s a great player that couldn’t apparently care less about representing USAH. That should be a consideration when the time comes and the tournament matters enough to interest him.
Other than the 2012 cut what else has USA hockey done to Trocheck ?
Just curious...
Checks and balances. It is all good and well for USA hockey to do some things because somebody went and played junior. But how dare that come back to haunt them. This isn't the Olympics. There are guys out there that have some legitimate beef with some of the players at USA Hockey over the years.
I wish the American NHL guys took this more seriously. I wish more guys wanted to play, I wish all of them wanted to play. Honestly I think something that would help that is if the IIHF didn't almost always keep it in Europe which I know the reasons for, but I am entitled to not like either.
Also where are you going to go with this because the hey lets punish everyone isn't going to happen either. Matthews couldn't bothered last year, Eichel I think understandably after injuries he has suffered is not coming this year but hey lets punish them... Well we would never do that, so what you're championing is punishment for our non-top tier talents.
You don’t have any proof for your first angle, from whether USAH punished him for playing in the OHL to whether that’s even a consideration for Trocheck’s decision, so none of that is relevant.
I never said USAH should punish a player for not playing once. I said they should punish guys that continually couldn’t care less. No, you don’t leave Matthews or Eichel home for skipping the occasional WC. They actually show up for them on occasion. But guys like Pacioretty or Trocheck or Galchenyuk that can’t be bothered should have to answer for that when it comes time for USAH to choose the type of team (Olympics, World Cup) they’d be willing to play for. Not that USAH won’t screw up the roster anyway, but they haven’t been winning best-on-best tournaments by ignoring player decisions on WC participation anyway, so they have little to lose by trying to foster some pride and competition in the program at the senior level.
Galchenyuk has showed up, heck he played a pivotal part in us winning a medal.
Cake and eat it too guys/gals.
The World Championship isn't a big event here. How do we make it a bigger event here? That is what I want to fix, sniping the guys that don't show up isn't a great angle we have been trying that for two decades. Maybe we should switch gears. Our are guys staying in the nicest hotels, are they doing up everything awesome for their families. We are on their job vacations time after all, especially since modern NHL players that aren't in the playoffs begin heavy workouts in June these days to gain an edge on the guys still grinding through.
Also you don't have any proof that they didn't, so that is a pot kettle situation. I can go ahead and PM you if you need further satisfaction.
Again I am a massive fan of almost every poster that talks USA Hockey. But I have to ask where are we getting trying to crucify the guys that don't answer the call? Why aren't we asking why USA Hockey still has this problem? Canada has been getting a lot more buy-in what are they doing different?
But fine let's cut off our nose to spite our face in selecting the Olympic team (not really a big concern probably) or World Cup where guys are extremely likely to play because hey they don't have to cross an ocean and hey the NHL puts them and their families up in spectacular accommodations.... Maybe that helps.
I am a realist. These guys love to play hockey, what are we doing wrong because at this point we are doing something wrong in my opinion.
I like a lot of you hope to hear some of the bigger names left out there do commit in the coming days.
I just think we need to start thinking of other ways to make players want to commit to this thing. I get the love of country thing and it pulls at a ton of us. But I am not in this situation either so it is easy to say how I would feel. I think we need to do more, place a premium on this tournament no matter how uncomfortable that makes the NHL. USA Hockey has a table scraps mentality should we honestly be surprised when it plays out that way?
Of course i would love to see that best players would always accept an invitation but i also understad why they do not always come. That is why i think this tournament should not be played every year. This tournament is pretty popular in Europe but there is always many european players also who does not show up. Biggest reason why this tournament is so small in North America and also biggest reason why players decline call ups is the time of the tournament. In Soccer World Cup is only once in four years. They should do the same in hockey. But yes i know its not possible because NHL did not allow players even to the olympics. NHL and IIHF should cooperate with the World Cup but it will never happen.
that is the trade off so the WJC can be held in North America every other year..I would say the biggest reason the tournament is so small in North America is it has been hosted in North America a whopping 4 times since 1920. Canada has hosted it once (2008) and the United States has hosted it 3 times with the last time being in 1962, the other two are actually Winter Olympic games that counted as the World Championship for that year.
I don't care if the NHL playoffs are happening say whatever you want but that is pathetic. That an event of this nature has traveled to one of the biggest areas of participation twice in 100 years since we know where the next five are anyway that is a safe statement. It is high time the IIHF stops whining about nobody in NA taking this seriously since they don't take us seriously as a place to host. I hope the NHL World Cup isn't this shortsighted and actually includes European host cities more frequently than once every five decades.
that is the trade off so the WJC can be held in North America every other year..
that is the trade off so the WJC can be held in North America every other year..
official/not official it is the truth. Hockey Canada and USA Hockey wants the WJC more than any World Championships - that is what they want and that is what they get hence the trade off of rarely asking to host one.Except they aren't making any trade off, the w.j.c could be held in N.A only once every 4 years or once every ten years for that matter and the WHC would still be where it is every single year...................in Europe.
There was never any deal between Hockey Canada/U.S.A that a deal such as this was agreed upon, not that I am aware of anyway, maybe I missed something and you can enlighten me on this, I am all ears, I don't mind being wrong.
I don't think it is the truth at all.official/not official it is the truth. Hockey Canada and USA Hockey wants the WJC more than any World Championships - that is what they want and that is what they get hence the trade off of rarely asking to host one.
official/not official it is the truth. Hockey Canada and USA Hockey wants the WJC more than any World Championships - that is what they want and that is what they get hence the trade off of rarely asking to host one.