I asked if it makes a “big difference”.
The answer is no. And again, Boucher is not a bust at this point. Could still turn out better than all those guys.
Yeah, people going on and on about Boucher at this point need to relax. Doesn’t look very good on them. These posts are 2 years premature. In other words a total waste of everyone’s time.
NHLer vs. non NHLer is a big difference.
3 years ago it was "people are being 2 years premature", 2 years ago it was "people are being 2 years premature", last year it was "people are being 2 years premature". I have zero doubts you'd see that every season since the draft. After a while, it's just normal, that's what you're going to get.
After a while, you can't use the excuse of "you just need to wait". That's not an evaluation, that's putting your head in the sand for your sanity. Putting your head in the sand isn't a good look.
Of course he's not a bust yet, he's only 20. But literally every bit of development of his potential, which was never thought very highly of in the first place, has gone worse than anyone could have imagined. That's what's being discussed, because that's what's actually happening.
Like it or not, highly drafted prospects are going to be followed, and when they do as poorly as Boucher has, which is as poorly as you could expect, it's going to be talked about.
I personally don't care much one way or the other, it's water under the bridge and is a sunk cost in my eyes. But evaluations of the pick and what's gone on since then, and guessing what's to come, are what this place is for.