With hindsight. Sure. Looks pretty awful.
Without hindsight? Go in any thread where a guy was just selected. There'll be guys pumping the pick and guys dumping the pick. That's cool. It's a message board for guys to chat hockey. But no one here knows, without hindsight, what's good or bad on draft day. Heck, scouts get the 1OA wrong probably half the time. We're talking 10 oa in a year where there really wasn't scouting.
It sure as hell hasn't worked out. But at 10, it's almost like playing roulette in a normal year.
I like, and dislike, picks all the time. Boucher had lots of people loving the pick, and lots not loving the pick. That’s part of the fandom of the game, we could pick anyone and there are going to be people who love, and people who hate it. It’s one of the anspects you see anmong any fandom regardless of what’s done.
There are picks where more caution and more questions are raised. Boucher undoubtedly falls into that category for a number of reasons. Like Thomas Hickey not being a smart pick never needed hindsight.
1. Team finished poorly again and had a top 10 pick (likely would be lower had the season continued, they were a worse team than they finished). People hoped/expected to get a good NHL prospect and player out of that.
2. Took a guy ranked much, much, much lower than where he was ranked, at a point in the draft where going off the board is a much bigger deal than late in the draft. 20 spots high in the 1st isn’t equal to 20 spots at other points in the draft.
Boucher is obviously one of those guys. Ranked in the mid/late 2nd on average, and 29th by the panel of 10 scouts, and then taken at 10th is obviously going to cause more caution than taking a guy who was ranked around 10.
We shouldn’t be surprised he’s not playing like a top 10 pick, or 1st round pick, he wasn’t considered one for the lost part at any point outside of a couple teams hoping to strike gold with a guy that could develop.
If we chose the guys ranked around where our pick was and they were having seasons and injuries like Boucher has, I’d think hindsight could be needed. Sillinger, Lucius, Cornato were the 3 players ranked highest left, and all are in the NHL or doing extremely well in the AHL.
I understand why they made the Boucher pick, I don’t agree with the line of thinking or the evaluation of Boucher, but I understand what the team thought they had compared to the guys left in the draft.
But we definitely don’t need hindsight to say that choosing a project, who really hadn’t shown much at any point, who was also injured for the majority of the season, who was also generally seen as a 2nd round project, with the 10th pick wasn’t wise.
Which is perfectly fine, not the first team to swing and miss, and won’t be the last. Part of the process. Boucher can still work his way to the league.