KingAlfie11
Registered User
- Nov 3, 2021
- 1,689
- 1,819
Relax buddy it's way too earlyMan sillenger makes this pick so painful
Wonder what happened in the draft room
Doesn’t look like they went for BPA
Relax buddy it's way too earlyMan sillenger makes this pick so painful
Wonder what happened in the draft room
Doesn’t look like they went for BPA
Probably the amount of time Boucher missed due to Covid & injuries & switching leagues & teams/teammates probably has hurt his development as well. I think we will see a different version of Boucher next season & give us a better idea of what kind of player he could be.Though I get the frustration, probably better served to have some patience. There's the potential for an effective NHL player worthy of being the 10th overall selection imo. It's been a disappointing season in regards to results and I can't put my finger on what exactly has been the issue. His combination of explosiveness, skill and work ethic is intriguing and I think it's a matter of time that it starts to yield results in junior hockey.
Well at least you have Jimmy at C...I think Boucher will be another version of Tkachuk probably not quite as good, he'll play a similar game & make his money in front of the net & disrupt the other team with hits & drive goalies nuts. I also think Stutzle with Boucher on his winf will make room out there for him & watch his back. They will need to have a goal scorer on LW & it wouldn't surprise me to see Jarventie on LW.
Tkachuk - Norris - Batherson
Jarventie - Stutzle - Boucher
Formenton - Pinto - C. Brown
Paul - Kastelic - Sokolov/Kelly
I wrote off all last seasons draft for the entire league. To much madness going on. Some teams hit, some didn't. Helps me sleep anyway.Well at least you have Jimmy at C...
Let's be real here. Yes Boucher has missed time (although just about every junior player has last 2 seasons) but how can you see what he has done and somehow project him to play with one of our most skilled players on the 2nd line?
He can't produce on the 67s top line right now. He has a looong way to go and he should be forgotten until at least the end of next season and then lets see if he can make Belleville.
Looking forward to seeing what he develops into.
Not reallyRelax buddy it's way too early
It really would, but the guy is pretty young and things could go either way for sure.I hope he makes those of us who questioned the pick look like idiots. Would be an amazing outcome
Ask Gus about bad developmental seasons.Probably as bad a season developmentally you could ask for, and made so, so much worse when it’s someone taken with the 10th overall, made even worse when it was considered such a reach in the first place.
Not the end of the world, tons and tons of time to turn the tides, but looks like a gigantic miss at the moment.
I wish Boucher was putting up Wilson numbers in his D+ 1 YearSillinger with a hat trick?
I wonder if Caps fans were as critical of the Tom Wilson pick after Hertl scored 4 goals.
Could you imagine if this was true? "Don't worry about scouting guys, someone good will fall to us. Oh crap, no one fell, who do we take now?! Are there any American kids going to play college hockey that play a physical game and come from an NHL family?"It’s quite easy to see what happened on draft day. Senators were banking on one of Guenther, Clarke, Eklund, Edvinsson, Johnson, Hughes or McTavish being available at #10. The Sens and more importantly the media were pushing Ottawa taking a goalie so they were banking on someone ahead of them reaching, taking a goalie or someone trading up to take a goalie.
They panicked when none of the top 9 fell to #10 and thus took Boucher at #10.
It’s quite easy to see what happened on draft day. Senators were banking on one of Guenther, Clarke, Eklund, Edvinsson, Johnson, Hughes or McTavish being available at #10. The Sens and more importantly the media were pushing Ottawa taking a goalie so they were banking on someone ahead of them reaching, taking a goalie or someone trading up to take a goalie.
They panicked when none of the top 9 fell to #10 and thus took Boucher at #10.
It’s quite easy to see what happened on draft day. Senators were banking on one of Guenther, Clarke, Eklund, Edvinsson, Johnson, Hughes or McTavish being available at #10. The Sens and more importantly the media were pushing Ottawa taking a goalie so they were banking on someone ahead of them reaching, taking a goalie or someone trading up to take a goalie.
They panicked when none of the top 9 fell to #10 and thus took Boucher at #10.
Cause an alt has 2500 messages over 5 yearsIs this the new alt account for the guy who wanted Chabot benched?
assennayo
Boucher is a terrible player and will be looked back upon as one of the worst selections in the history of the NHL draft.Yes, it's so obvious that their list only went to 9 and they couldn't fathom all of those guys would be gone. So they picked a name at random and lo and behold, we have Tyler Boucher.
The Senators had a list and Boucher was the top guy on it when they got to 10. He could've been 7th on their list for all we know.
At this point, all I can do is say that Boucher is a Senators prospect and I like his toolset. I don't care where he was drafted and who came after him because what's done is done. I like what I see from him and it's way too early to write him off as a lot of people have done.
This post is just another example of why online discussions are pointless. Most people are simply here to spew and troll and don’t care a wit about the words they put out there.Boucher is a terrible player and will be looked back upon as one of the worst selections in the history of the NHL draft.
Doubt that … id take my chances on his skill set vs your insight ..Boucher is a terrible player and will be looked back upon as one of the worst selections in the history of the NHL draft.
The answer is simple. They liked Boucher more than sillinger. Maybe didn’t like sillinger at all.Why could we haven't picked Sillinger and then moved up for Boucher. Or just not pick Boucher at all.