Roadhouse
Bring me back to 2006...
I don't love the Anderson contract but it really should not affect Gallagher. Anderson is two years younger than Gallagher and his 7 year contract starts this year. That will make him 33 at the end.
A four-year extension for Gallagher would take him to 33 as well, and he will and has surely been offered more than $5.5M that Anderson got. Bergevin himself said publicly Gallagher will be the highest paid forward on the team, AFTER he signed Anderson. $6.5M x 4 is no insult!! The problem is that Gallagher seemingly told the Habs he wants much longer term. The club can't commit to a big dollar contract to age 36 or 37 in today's context. That has nothing to do with Anderson actually.
Full agreed with the bolded. Not only is Anderson on a 'younger' timeline, his speed / size / shot as of today all appear to be a level above Gally's.
And I think to be fair to the org, the AAV they can offer Gallagher may even depend on what they 'need' to fork out to keep Danault with no immediate replacement in sight.
(and this wouldn't be an issue if Poehling was close to being able to eat 3C minutes instead of projecting like Jay Beagle, but I'm half-kidding here and am not even sure you remember this from 18 months ago at the end of the OHL playoffs when we discussed Poehling & Suzuki... I know I know, Nick won't be Paul Kariya but at least like Paul he projects as a top 6 forward now)