admiralcadillac
Registered User
- Oct 22, 2017
- 7,668
- 6,977
Hahahaha he'll get way more than 5.75 on the Open Market. He's done enough for us already in his career. 250K more than a guy who has done nothing for us previously and has never scored 30 nor proven himself consistently.I wouldn’t let Suzuki and KK walk before Gally and that’s about it. Having said that he can’t expect to try and claw back the millions he thinks he missed while on his sweetheart deal, especially in the currently economic climate. 8x$5.75
Armia will slot into the 3-4th line winger where as Gally/Toffolli and Anderson will all look to be in the top 6. If Toffolli has had success on the left side, this could move Drouin down into the 3rd line which would make sense.I suspect Armia will play LW, slotting Toffoli on his natural RW
Why would he believe that you'd sign him to fair market value in 4 years?Bergevin is such a two-faced GM.
Yesterday he said he does not comment on negotiations.
About a week ago, he told RDS that Gallagher will be the highest paid forward on the team, that he won't want a 'short' 4-5 year contract but rather a long one, and that he is committed to having Gallagher retire a Hab.
Perhaps he came to his senses since.
If it were me, I would be telling him,
"Brendan, it's a strange world out there right now. I don't know how you feel about things, but look at what Taylor Hall did, look at how most contracts that UFAs signed were for less money than their previous one, and half the guys aren't even signed yet.
You know we want you and respect you, so here's the deal: you can have whatever number of years you want, up to four, at $6.5M. Whenever your deal is up, we will work with you to extend at a fair market value at that time, under those circumstances. You choose the timing, just let us know."
I'd say keep him for now, with ongoing negotiations. Come trade deadline if there's no deal, move him. They could probably get something pretty good for him and they could get something extra if the new team signs him. Hopefully, one or 2 of the kids steps up like Ylonen or Poehling.This is more popular than you think.
IMO this will be Drouin’s make or break season, he’ll get his all the chance playing next to Suzuki who he seems to have chemistry with, if that doesn’t work he’s gonzo I think.Armia will slot into the 3-4th line winger where as Gally/Toffolli and Anderson will all look to be in the top 6. If Toffolli has had success on the left side, this could move Drouin down into the 3rd line which would make sense.
I have zero issue with Gallagher leaving even if he's one of my favourites of all-time. My issue that we replaced him with an awful contract on a player who is 26 years old and had one good season on a higher scorer team than Montreal.If I can be 1 of 21k fans in the Bell Centre giving Saku Koivu a standing ovation before the games opening face off while he is wearing a white Ducks jersey, then I can most definitely get used to seeing Gallagher wearing another uniform.
Let’s just make sure he doesn’t walk for nothing.
So Gallagher is probably looking at the Kreider contract of 7 years x 6.5 million.
I bet the Habs are offering 4 or 5 years at 6ish per year.
7 years for Gallagher is mighty scary but he's the heart of this team. I never want to see him in another jersey.
I’d rather play with the current lineup and see what happens. If it so happens Gallagher walks after the playoffs so be it.
I think something like 4x6.75 or 5x6.25 or 6x6 and 7x5.75. Give him the choice but try to make it enticing for shorter term. Gallagher is one tough cookie but wear and tear is inevitable.I’d be happy with 6x6. We need him for at least 2 years, 3 if that’s what it takes Caufield to develop. If he can put in 18-25 goals in years 4-6 while being a team leader, I’m fine with that.
Because if we don't, someone else will.Why would he believe that you'd sign him to fair market value in 4 years?
I agree. Rentabilizing assets is good and wishable. But losing Gallagher is nothing compared to losing Pietrangelo. It's nothing compared to than losing Panarin. Hell. It's also nothing compared to losing Krug as far as I'm concerned.
Hopefully we can re-sign him to a decent contract. But if it does not make sense, let's either visit scenarios where we can trade him for a comparable UFA winger next trade deadline, or shop for replacements on the trade market or the UFA market.
Inconsistent...huh. He's probably the most predictable player in terms of what you're going to get every night and his point totals don't change very much.i am kinda sold on moving gallagher... in the last couple of years his play has really been inconsistent at best and he just gets more and more worn down. Sometimes he looks like he just learned how to skate. I am sure some playoffs bound team (not habs) next season will be looking to add a pest for a deep run (again, not habs). May get best value for him at the trade deadline-ish, provided he has a somewhat decent season or just not injured.
But if the right deal comes along, move him at any time. Unlike many, i am not married to the idea of Gallagher being a Hab forever.
What do we trade him for with one year on his contract anyways? He’s a great player and losing him prior to this season will do more harm than good. If it’s the difference between having an extra 1st or a prospect I’ll pass and see what this team can do. Ideally if he wants to resign we get rid of Tatar or Byron and get the ELC’s to come in next year.
He will be very disappointed on the Open Market. Teams are already struggling fitting their players within the cap and next year will be an even harder exercise with the flat cap.Hahahaha he'll get way more than 5.75 on the Open Market. He's done enough for us already in his career. 250K more than a guy who has done nothing for us previously and has never scored 30 nor proven himself consistently.
I don't love the Anderson contract but it really should not affect Gallagher. Anderson is two years younger than Gallagher and his 7 year contract starts this year. That will make him 33 at the end.I have zero issue with Gallagher leaving even if he's one of my favourites of all-time. My issue that we replaced him with an awful contract on a player who is 26 years old and had one good season on a higher scorer team than Montreal.
The problem is the precedent that set for Gallagher in the first place.
It depends on what the return is and how he is replaced.What do we trade him for with one year on his contract anyways? He’s a great player and losing him prior to this season will do more harm than good. If it’s the difference between having an extra 1st or a prospect I’ll pass and see what this team can do. Ideally if he wants to resign we get rid of Tatar or Byron and get the ELC’s to come in next year.
The Rangers once trade Ryan Callahan for Martin St. Louis. Both were UFAs to be if I'm not mistaken and both re-signed on their new team. I certainly can see things playing out like this if it comes down to that. Many possible scenarios.
I would also not call Gallagher a "great player". I think he's a very good player and in an ideal world you keep him. But losing him is nowhere as dramatic as some Habs fans are led to think. Losing Jeff Petry would have been way, WAY worse.