garyturner3
Registered User
- Jun 16, 2015
- 2,323
- 955
This is silly. There's been maybe 3 similar situations to Trouba's in recent history. Drouin, johansen, and turris. They all ended up differently and imo represent the 3 ways this could go.
Drouin- he sat out for a significant period of time. Yzerman refuses to trade him and he eventually rejoined the team and seems to be happy playing for them now.
Johansen- held out for a while. Eventually signed a bridge deal and was traded 15 months later for a very specific return. 1 for 1.
Turris- holds out and signs a bridge deal just before the deadline. Gets traded shortly thereafter for a poor return just to get rid of the problem. Undoubtedly a loss.
I don't know why anyone would argue that following the Turris scenario would be the best asset management. IMO, trouba will follow johansen's path. He will sign a bridge deal and be traded at the draft or sometime next season. The only way he is traded now is if Chevy can take advantage of the ducks cap crunch. Otherwise he will sign.
The only example in your comparables with a favorable return is not a valid comparable at all. The Johansen scenario is not comparable to the Trouba one. Johansen held out because of standard contract/money issues which happens with players on every team on a regular basis. It's not the reason he was traded. MUCH different story than a player holding out after publicly demanding a trade. That situation has far fewer comparables and none that I can think of where the return was a fair value 1-1 swap.