Henchmen 21
Registered User
Absolutely it hurts Winnipeg to have Trouba holding out, but what choice do they have?
1. take a bad trade in return, thereby caving to Trouba/agent/dad and setting a precedent?
2. set a different precedent by letting Trouba sit - tell the league and agents that it's not a team to screw with regardless of the outcome.
3. make a good trade when the time comes, for the Jets hopefully sooner rather than later. Wishful thinking perhaps so the first two options are the more likely.
The reality is that the management in Winnipeg (and other less desirable cities in the NHL) have to be careful about how they manage their players to a far greater degree than a New York Rangers or Los Angeles Kings. It's not a desirable city to play in based on perception which depending on the individual may or may not have anything to do with reality. But the Jets management has shown tremendous loyalty to many of their players, re-signing them to decent contracts (so far nothing entirely stupid but still good money - get back to me in a few years on Buff). They will take care of the people that want to play there, otherwise not so much. It's a good organization, unless dear old daddy has an app that needs junior to be in a "better" market.
Trouba not playing absolutely weakens the Jets for this year. It's a tremendous blow to the team to lose a highly rated draft pick that has shown to be at minimum a very useful if not high scoring defenseman. Tossing away that asset by giving in to demands of a player/agent isn't going to help the team in the long run though because it does set that precedent that the team's management can be held hostage on a whim. The CBA exists to mitigate the risks to all teams in the NHL when they draft a player by giving them player security for seven years. Overhardt and Trouba are trying to circumvent that and it's not new behavior for the agent. Hopefully the Jets have a solid season with their defense and Trouba sits for a year with no salary - that takes ballpark $5 million out of his pocket and whatever percentage (10? 20?) out of Overhardt's as well.
The behavior that is being exhibited is hurting hockey down the road when the next CBA comes due for negotiation. Teams will be looking to strengthen the CBA when it comes to RFA negotiation and we all know that means lockout yet again (not that it wouldn't happen otherwise) and to be honest I'd actually back the NHL on that basis rather than the players.
Chris Pronger requested a trade out of Edmonton, lots of speculation as to why, but most agree his Wife was a driving force behind the actual request out. How has that bdad precedent hurt Edmonton exactly? Losing Pronger crippled their defense, and kinda ushedered in their era of finishing perenially last, but what PRECEDENT are you talking about exactly?
The Jets are set up to succeed without Trouba, what happened to edmonton was a totally different scenario, But I can't come up with one person taking the precedent of Chris Pronger's exit to hasten their own. You guys don't want the gloating internet posts, which I can totally understand given the nature of these message boards, but to quote that dude from walking dead, when you gotta eat ****, don't nibble at it. Bite, chew, swallow