Your prospect pool has done a lot for the team in the last 5 years.
Look at what came to WPG from Atlanta.. Wheeler. Scheifele was drafted before Winnipegs first year. Little was already there. As was Postma, Enstrom, Buff.
Your top 3-5 prospect pool has accomplished nothing yet, the core of the team that got them to the playoffs only to win nothing was built before Cheveldayoff took over the team. I see no reason to give Cheveldayoff undue praise until they actually win something. Being a bad team year after year and getting top pick after top pick isn't hard to do.
As far as your "do research comment", I have been watching this team since they first came to Atlanta. I suffered through the days of Damien Rhodes and Norm Maracle in goal, letting up 6-8 goals a game.
Just because you don't like what I have to say doesn't mean I know nothing about the team as you suggest.
1) It's 'draft and develop' that front offices preach, not 'draft and put them in the lineup right away because they'll be good enough already'. They drafted two goalies who have now put some time in at the AHL level and at least one appears ready to try to make noise in the NHL. That pick was made after only one season in Winnipeg.
2) Who's "being a bad team year after year and getting top pick after top pick"? The Jets' picks were 7th, 9th, 13th, 9th, 17th, and most recently 2nd (after finishing 6th-last and winning the lottery). They have actually been shredded by many fans for not being bad (and drafting high) enough--do a search on the Jets board for 'no man's land' or 'mushy middle'.
In any case, it's quite different from drafting 3rd one year and 4th the next. Only to take big dumb, smooth skaters with all the tools and no tool box. But I digress.
3) Byfuglien, Little, Wheeler, Ladd, and Enström are and/or were great, but they had nothing around them and the team had no expendable assets with which to complement them.
Well considering they dealt Lucic on the same day, if they hadn't moved Hamilton that very second they would of been no more or less vulnerable to an offer sheet than Winnipeg is right now with Trouba.
If Trouba truly wants out of Winnipeg, the last thing he is doing is signing an offer sheet unless it's a 1-year mega-offer (say 8 million +) so the Jets if match a year from now they have to qualify him at that number.
In that case, you take the picks. Especially if they belong to the team willing to sign that contract.
How about..
Trouba, Armia, Pavelec
For
Varlamov, Zadorov, Comeau
Probably the best the Avs can do realistically. Not sure if Jets would want Varly because of expansion but him and Hellebuyck would make a great tandem. I'm sure the Avs could throw in a sweetner that the Jets could flip to Vegas to prevent them from taking one of their goalies.
EDIT: Has to be Zadorov because bigras is exempt from expansion I believe. Would rather send Bigras and keep big Z though. Almost looks lopsided in the Jets favour strictly value-wise, but depends on their interest in Varly.
The Jets will be protecting Hellebuyck in the expansion draft.
He'll play in Europe with a deal that allows him to return to the NHL at anytime and become a Black Ace next year since you won't want to protect 4 D men. Or you lose a bunch of forwards to keep an unsigned player who sat out a year and has no desire to ever play for you again. Or he gets his trade.
Win-win for him.
Even if he doesn't play before then, and even if he's under contract with a European club, the Jets will need to protect Trouba in the expansion draft or Las Vegas can select his rights.
The thread is a joke anyways with all the people turning their noses up at Fowler and Krug who are fair value as the top D coming back given the circumstances. They can get a decent young player with NHL experience and some prospects or a massive haul of prospects. Nothing wrong with that the Jets will be fine simply because he wasn't their most important D man or close to it. Someone will pay up a better offer than what we got for Dougie Hamilton.
Fowler is a UFA in two years. In Trouba the Jets were counting on a core player who would be contributing throughout Schiefele's, Ehlers's, Hellebuyck's, and Laine's primes.
With cost control discount over the next four years.
Fowler may be great, but he's simply not comparable contract-status-wise.