Proposal: Trouba for Hanifin

sheriff bart

Where are the white women at
Nov 11, 2010
2,755
14,083
Rock Ridge
Let me see if I have this figured out.

Canes have no need to trade D for D.

Laine, a number 2 overall forward who hasn't played a single game in the league is far more valuable than a number 4 overall 18 year old defenseman with a high ceiling that has a year's experience at the hardest position to crack the lineup as a young player.

Skinner is once again on life support.

...seems about right to me.
 

bert

Registered User
Nov 11, 2002
37,576
23,898
Visit site
If the Jets are serious about acquiring Hanifin, I'm thinking Laine would be the name the Canes ask for. Even then, not sure the Canes would pull the trigger.

Clearly they would look at the rest of the thread loaded on D. Jets dont do that anyways.

Carolina is looking to deal for a young impact forward if Hanafin is moved.
 

member 157595

Guest
Winnipeg (rightfully so) will not move Laine for Hanifin. However, Carolina has no need to move Hanifin to Winnipeg for anything less than Laine.

There's nothing to see here.
 

member 157595

Guest
Lol....Jet fans ( I am one)

Yes it would cost Laine to get Hanifin.

No, Trouba is not enough.

This guy gets it.

Not only does Hanifin have higher trade value than Trouba, Trouba doesn't fill a need for Carolina.

Winnipeg is a well-run organization and would reject any even remotely semi-realistic trade offer involving Patrik Laine.
 

Chan790

Registered User
Sponsor
Jan 24, 2012
4,053
2,739
Bingy town, NY
This guy gets it.

Not only does Hanifin have higher trade value than Trouba, Trouba doesn't fill a need for Carolina.

Winnipeg is a well-run organization and would reject any even remotely semi-realistic trade offer involving Patrik Laine.

This is pretty much the exact same situation for the Canes and Hanifin.

It's really the only reason the proposal has merit, even as unlikely as it is...because the only way to actually tempt someone to move an untouchable asset is to offer an untouchable asset of your own that would only be available for the untouchable asset and for no combination of lesser pieces.
 

member 157595

Guest
This is pretty much the exact same situation for the Canes and Hanifin.

It's really the only reason the proposal has merit, even as unlikely as it is...because the only way to actually tempt someone to move an untouchable asset is to offer an untouchable asset of your own that would only be available for the untouchable asset and for no combination of lesser pieces.

I don't disagree. I wanted Hanifin at #4 in 2015 and was disappointed when we passed on him. You don't even want to know what it would take for me to entertain moving Auston Matthews. :laugh:

Carolina would be stupid to trade Hanifin for anything less than a king's ransom. Guys like Hanifin and Laine simply don't get moved.
 

major major

Registered User
Feb 18, 2013
14,598
1,669
Winnipeg (rightfully so) will not move Laine for Hanifin. However, Carolina has no need to move Hanifin to Winnipeg for anything less than Laine.

There's nothing to see here.

They won't, but I think the Jets should. Laine could be scoring 35g a year, and I'd still say they need Hanifin more.
 

member 157595

Guest
They won't, but I think the Jets should. Laine could be scoring 35g a year, and I'd still say they need Hanifin more.

I'm a Toronto fan so I have no dog in this fight, and if the Jets had ended up with Puljujarvi I would have definitely agreed with you, but I couldn't move Laine.
 

Hunter368

RIP lomiller1, see you in the next life buddy.
Nov 8, 2011
27,407
24,576
Hanifin would be very expensive to get (not that the Canes would anyways). The Jets imo don't have a big enough need to pay the likely cost, I think both teams would walk away from this one.
 

McSuper

5-14-6-1
Jun 16, 2012
17,153
6,914
Halifax
Trouba for Hanfin. Can it happen? I doubt Carolina is looking to part with Hanifin. But everyone is available for the right price, and Trouba (plus?) should definitely be in the ballpark of the "right price". I'm guessing most would suggest that the Jets add here. If so, would Roslovic be enough? Roslovic and a pick? The jets will likely have to over pay to pry Hanifin away, and I'm fine with a realistic overpayment. So what's a realistic trade for Touba and Hanifin to swap teams?

I would take Hanifin all day long ,every day and 3 times on Sunday and 4 times on Christmas over Trouba
 

RodTheBawd

Registered User
Oct 16, 2013
5,529
8,604
In regards to Hanifin and Laine, I think it comes down to whether you'd rather have a possible Norris candidate, or Rocket Richard contender (talking ceiling potential here). Not a decision you can make until you can remove "possible" or "potential", and you know your team needs at the time. Both should be studs, neither will move any time soon.
 

camdon

Registered User
Oct 24, 2008
217
6
Karl Alzner, Luke Schenn,Morgan Rielly, Ryan Whitney,Vitali Vishnevsky

The list goes on and on... Statically speaking Hanfin's plays a similar game to Ryan Whitney. Time will tell if he can match that career.
 

Hunter368

RIP lomiller1, see you in the next life buddy.
Nov 8, 2011
27,407
24,576
In regards to Hanifin and Laine, I think it comes down to whether you'd rather have a possible Norris candidate, or Rocket Richard contender (talking ceiling potential here). Not a decision you can make until you can remove "possible" or "potential", and you know your team needs at the time. Both should be studs, neither will move any time soon.

Agreed. :handclap:
 

Boom Boom Apathy

I am the Professor. Deal with it!
Sep 6, 2006
49,397
102,374
Doesnt Trouba for Lindholm make the most sense?

Which Lindholm, Elias? If so, not really. Canes lack forwards with skill so can't afford to lose one forward with skill for another D, where they are deep. Opposite is true for WPG. They are loaded at Forward so don't need Lindholm, but based on what I've read here, want a LHD.
 

Brock Radunske

안양종합운동장 빙상장
Aug 8, 2012
16,787
4,701
Trouba for Hanfin. Can it happen? I doubt Carolina is looking to part with Hanifin. But everyone is available for the right price, and Trouba (plus?) should definitely be in the ballpark of the "right price". I'm guessing most would suggest that the Jets add here. If so, would Roslovic be enough? Roslovic and a pick? The jets will likely have to over pay to pry Hanifin away, and I'm fine with a realistic overpayment. So what's a realistic trade for Touba and Hanifin to swap teams?

The Jets would have to add a pretty nice piece to Trouba to return Hanifin. He's better, younger and signed.
 
Last edited:

tgo0

Registered User
Aug 28, 2007
1,707
828
Winnipeg
I'd do it as a Jets fan. Very much doubt CAR would.


I'd even add a decent prospect/young player (Roslovic, Petan, Armia) and still doubt CAR would be thrilled.
 

McSuper

5-14-6-1
Jun 16, 2012
17,153
6,914
Halifax
Ah got it. You prefer Beaulieu because of untrue things you've made up about Trouba. Lmao

Sometimes you don't need to make things up . No one knows what Trouba contract demands are . But it is logical to assume he is asking for a contract the Jets management are not comfortable giving him or the deal would be done . If I were to say I prefer Davidson over Trouba does that mean I think Davidson is better ? No . It I prefer the guy that is trending upwards and has always been humble . Plus he signed a cheap deal . Trouba value is at a all time low because he is not signed
 

Chan790

Registered User
Sponsor
Jan 24, 2012
4,053
2,739
Bingy town, NY
This has probably been said numerous times but...

Toronto gets trouba
Carolina gets nylander
Winnipeg gets hanifin

Adds where needed.

Wouldn't trade Hanifin for Nylander or Trouba. Adds are immaterial, the assets that need to be on the table...aren't on the table.

If Winnipeg wants Hanifin, it costs Laine.
If Toronto wants Hanifin, Canes add for Matthews.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad