Pandaman11
Registered User
- Dec 3, 2009
- 2,826
- 1,312
Proposal: Trouba all encompassing trade thread
- Thread starter Hunter368
- Start date
- Status
McNuge
Registered User
Not sure why NYI would give up the better player on what will likely be a cheaper contract.
TLeafsFan
A True BeLeafer
Question for Jets fans regarding a potential trade with the Leafs.
We know you want to get a D back the other way, probably a RHD.
Would you go for JVR + Carrick?
We know you want to get a D back the other way, probably a RHD.
Would you go for JVR + Carrick?
Maukkis
EZ4ENCE
- Mar 16, 2016
- 10,721
- 7,597
NYR and Anaheim are wild cards for me. You never know what happens with Lindholm, and NYR might want to go down the retool route (although this is unlikely too). Edmonton is a good add to the list, Carolina... not so much. Boston has the prospects to make a deal go through, with decent enough adds. Philly definitely has the pieces (and given the likelihood of getting a prospect back, we could even take a small cap dump now). Dallas was a brainfart by me, I got Klingberg's handedness wrong. Minnesota is semi-wild card.
So my list is Anaheim, Edmonton, Philly, Boston, Arizona and Toronto, then Minnesota, NYR and Carolina as lesser likely places. Those teams make an awful lot of sense for Trouba and the Jets. That should be enough for us, anyway.
Maukkis
EZ4ENCE
- Mar 16, 2016
- 10,721
- 7,597
MardyBum
Registered User
Ladd "wanted" 6/41, signed 7/38.5
Buff "wanted" 8/55, signed 5/38
Trouba "wants" 8/56 will sign for ???
What they first ask for in negotiation and what they sign for are never the same number.
TLeafsFan
A True BeLeafer
Why?
JVR + Laine as top six LW > Laine Ehlers
Much better Ladd replacement.
Carrick looks like a young Tyson Barrie.
Kraken Jokes
Registered User
- May 28, 2010
- 3,991
- 1,512
Quick scan through the teams, it looks on the surface like Carolina could be the best fit. He'd fit nicely. On the 2nd pairing behind Faulk, they have the cap space and plenty of good young LD to send the other way.
GMs already know. He's a free agent and can talk contract with whoever he wants.
Trouba said the issue has never been money. His agent said he's keen on facilitating a trade to get Trouba where he wants to go.
There is very little evidence that contract demands will affect a trade. It's all about Chevy getting his trade price.
He is not getting 7 mill from anyone, per year. The Coyotes just signed Murphy for under 4 mill for 6 years and he was actually playing top pair minutes. Trouba, as an RFA will be in the same range, maybe a little more with whatever team he plays with next year. I doubt it starts with a 5 per year or more. I think he just wants out of the Peg, knowing he can't maximize his value there playing behind Buf and others at times or the left side.
exporta
Registered User
- Jul 30, 2005
- 3,224
- 253
Gardiner had a gods season, so some Leaf fans will be hesitant.
That being said, I project Trouba ends up the best of all three. So I would make that deal. 2nd pairing LHD is much easier to come by.
Liferleafer
TSN Scrum Lurker
- Feb 9, 2011
- 39,848
- 13,005
Slavin is untouchable and Hanifin wouldn't go without a significant add from WPG. For Carolina you'd be looking at more future/near future options like Haydn Fleury or Jake Bean. Although I do agree that Carolina could use a RD with Trouba's attributes.
I think so too, but their financial situation is questionable.
When the player coming back is Jacob Trouba, no he isn't.
Made Dan
Registered User
Trouba's one of my favorite players and would love to see him on the Rangers. Just don't have the pieces. How much would Jets fans value a return of local boy Dylan Mcilrath? 
They wouldn't trade Dermott or Neilsen if they're trading Gardiner. It would have to be Gardiner + picks.
Pandaman11
Registered User
- Dec 3, 2009
- 2,826
- 1,312
It doesn't need to be straight up (okay, I see that I made it sound like it should)
MikeModano9
Registered User
I never said it was. I know how contract negotiations work. I'm just stating the $7M isn't some random HF number made up.
It was a random media number that was made up, and immediately refuted by his agent.
Trouba Trade
I truly believe the following is a legitimate proposal that solves 3 teams immediate needs and should work for everybody cap wise(more or less)
NEEDS:
Ana: Top 6 winger
Wpg: LHD
Det: RHD
Deal:
To Ana: Nyquist + Smith/Pulks/Jurco/Turgeon/Sadowy/2017 2nd.
To Wpg: Fowler + Det 2017 1st.
To Det: Trouba
I'm not saying that Trouba will ever be a Norris winner, but I can see him on our #1 pair with DDK at least for the next 5-6 yrs. I am also willing to overpay for him as well. If I'm Holland, any and all assets not named Mrazek, DDK, Larkin, AA and Mantha can be made available to make these 2 deals work. This includes any roster players, expansion exempt prospects(i.e.:Saarijarvi/Svechnikov) and as many 1st and 2nd rd. picks. as needed. This is a doable deal Ken-make it happen.
I truly believe the following is a legitimate proposal that solves 3 teams immediate needs and should work for everybody cap wise(more or less)
NEEDS:
Ana: Top 6 winger
Wpg: LHD
Det: RHD
Deal:
To Ana: Nyquist + Smith/Pulks/Jurco/Turgeon/Sadowy/2017 2nd.
To Wpg: Fowler + Det 2017 1st.
To Det: Trouba
I'm not saying that Trouba will ever be a Norris winner, but I can see him on our #1 pair with DDK at least for the next 5-6 yrs. I am also willing to overpay for him as well. If I'm Holland, any and all assets not named Mrazek, DDK, Larkin, AA and Mantha can be made available to make these 2 deals work. This includes any roster players, expansion exempt prospects(i.e.:Saarijarvi/Svechnikov) and as many 1st and 2nd rd. picks. as needed. This is a doable deal Ken-make it happen.
- Status
