If Marchand also wants Coyle, that line will challenge the league for the worst second line.Lame Duck coach
Marchand wants Geekie
f*** them kids
If Marchand also wants Coyle, that line will challenge the league for the worst second line.Lame Duck coach
Marchand wants Geekie
f*** them kids
It'll be marchand-coyle-geekie, Monty will deploy them as a shutdown line, and they'll get absolutely smoked when we play good teams (like they did last season) but this time they won't have Sway/Ullmark every game to save their ass. It's a recipe for disaster.If Marchand also wants Coyle, that line will challenge the league for the worst second line.
They'll realize it sooner than later.It'll be marchand-coyle-geekie, Monty will deploy them as a shutdown line, and they'll get absolutely smoked when we play good teams (like they did last season) but this time they won't have Sway/Ullmark every game to save their ass. It's a recipe for disaster.
Am I the only one who would like to see Brazeau with Coyle and Marchand? Am I also the only one who thinks Geekie is VERY overrated?Marchand - Coyle - Geekie will be a very good 3rd line. The 2nd line will definitely be Frederic - Poitras - Brazeau.
It won’t take long to establish that.
Geekie doesn’t do it for me, never hasAm I the only one who would like to see Brazeau with Coyle and Marchand? Am I also the only one who thinks Geekie is VERY overrated?
He's a low impact player with a great shot. Tries hard, but ultimately generates very little offense on his own and is a pretty poor defender. Type of guy that is perfectly suited for a third line wing spot next to a playmaker, but a top 6 shutdown role? It's just asking too much from him.Geekie doesn’t do it for me, never has
Geekie and Frederic interest me a lot this year.They overrate Geekie badly. He is a decent 3rd/4th line player but Montgomery puts high value on flexibility. Geekie can kill penalties, play center or wing and not hurt them defensively. He won't provide a lot if offense but will provide enough.
I still want Marchand-Poitras-Frederic as line 2.
no one is really hating on geekie as a player, we're just hating on the bruins evaluation of him. They just seem to wildly overrate him in a way I don't really understand.In Geekie's defense, he was 4th line on Seattle. I think he was a great value signing and agree 2nd line is not where i'd like to see him. But he's been very solid for us imo
This, like, isn't at all the case. Lysell is sort of like a poor man's Taylor Hall, when Hall was younger. Everyone thought Hall was supposed to be some mad goal scoring reincarnation of Pavel Bure, when he was more just a guy who could transition through the neutral zone in a blink and play off the half wall, mostly passing but also driving at tight angles to cause mayhem.Heavy on assists when he's supposed to be a goal scorer.
It'll be marchand-coyle-geekie, Monty will deploy them as a shutdown line, and they'll get absolutely smoked when we play good teams (like they did last season) but this time they won't have Sway/Ullmark every game to save their ass. It's a recipe for disaster.
They overrate Geekie badly. He is a decent 3rd/4th line player but Montgomery puts high value on flexibility. Geekie can kill penalties, play center or wing and not hurt them defensively. He won't provide a lot if offense but will provide enough.
I still want Marchand-Poitras-Frederic as line 2.
I liked how Brown played this preseason. Meat and potatoes guy but I thought his forecheck was really good and was hard on the puck.
Lysell wasn't in competition for a 4th line role - he was competing with Poitras, Geekie, Johnson for a middle wing spot on the team. This doesn't close the book on Lysell's potential future ; it's just another roadblock they want him to hurdle over and force his way on to the team. I thought he did enough to at least warrant a longer look and I liked his play a hell of a lot better than Johnson's.
It appears Beecher and Kastelic are locks for two of the 4th line spots and they're still trying to figure out Johnson vs Brazeau vs Brown vs Tufte vs Jones for three of the remaing bottom 9 spots.
I wish I could buy this post 3-4 craft beers and a pretzel.This, like, isn't at all the case. Lysell is sort of like a poor man's Taylor Hall, when Hall was younger. Everyone thought Hall was supposed to be some mad goal scoring reincarnation of Pavel Bure, when he was more just a guy who could transition through the neutral zone in a blink and play off the half wall, mostly passing but also driving at tight angles to cause mayhem.
Thinking about it, I love that comparison. Lysell goes through the NZ like his hair's on fire and plays off the wall basically in isolation. He needs to work on two things - pulling up after making the offensive zone instead of bulling into some monster D looking to kill him, and continuing to refine his passing. He's made a lot of improvement to his passing but you'll still see him occasionally pass to an invisible teammate, which he did endlessly in his one SHL season.
Lysell's shot has improved by leaps and bounds by the year, but he's never going to be a top goal scorer. And no one ever really pegged him to be one, as far as I know.
a soon to be 24 year old UDFA that can't crack the NHL lineup has no value.
Brown should not be a consideration. Terrible NHLer. The 13th can be Tufte for size or if Sweeney truly needs a 5'8 veteran then Johnson is... acceptable.
Cannot imagine they signed Jones only to be the 13th forward as well.
Spooner played himself out of the NHL with laziness and a bad attitude despite all the opportunities. That doesn't seem to be Lysell at all.Lysell is turning into Ryan Spooner 2.0.
I think the roles available are a factor as well.Simply a combination of bigger picture implications + player readiness/push
Lots of players don’t crack varsity for a few years after their draft year - one is our captain