Max is having a good camp. He has shown that he can compete and while he will need a season in MCH imo I think he will become a solid 3rd line LW in a season or two. He is fitting in and the coaches like his positional play allot or so it has been said. Max believes that he will start scoring once he gets use to the pace of the NA game. He has shown moments of very good play and moments of hesitation. Once he overcomes that he will be ready.
He is right on track from where he was drafted. Solid player.
Thanks TG, always appreciate the insight. I agree, a year (maybe two) in manchester is needed. One for sure, but with our depth in prospects, he might have to go down for another year just because the competition is so stiff. Plus he does have a lot of rough edges to smooth out and I'd rather see him do that getting 15 minutes a game and PP time in manchester, not half that in LA on the 4th line.
Let's do the math. The trade deadline is approximately 3/4 of the way through the season. If we are $600k below the cap, we would bank 3/4 * $600k = $450k. We would have another 1/4 * $600k = $150k in savings below the cap for the remainder of the season, for a total of $600k.
To acquire a RR type person, we would be on the hook for 1/4 * $4 million = $1mm.
$1mm is > $600k. That would be a breach of salary cap.
Let's put this another way. If we had $450k "in the bank" 3/4 of the way through the season, we could afford someone with a cap hit of $2.4 million. (We are on the hook for $2.4 million * 1/4 = $600k).
I don't know of too many defensemen that would be on the trade block at $2.4 million that would drastically improve our team. Certainly none the caliber of WM or RR.
Also, keep in mind that this assumes we do not suffer any injuries and need to call up any AHL players. If someone goes on IR (but not LTIR), we would still need to count their salary against the salary cap plus the pro-rated portion of the AHL call up salary cap number. In Vey or Andreoff, that salary is ~$900k.
Class is dismissed.
The flaw with your 'math' is that you don't prorate the amount we are under the cap the whole time. You say if we are $600K under the cap, we'd only have $450,000 to spend at the deadline.
That is false. We'd have a much larger amount. You don't pro-rate that to the protion of the season that has been played.
If, for example, we waived Schultz tomorrow, we'd be $600,000 under the cap. that means we have $600,000 in cap space to spend. After five games into the season, you don't say we have $600,000 X 5/82 =$36,585 cap space to spend. We have $600,000 to spend.
For each dollar you are under the cap, the amount that dollar is worth goes up as the season goes along. Teams can actually spend well above the cap towards the end of the season because they've spent below it during the season.
I'm not sure of the formula to determine how much being $600,000 under the cap all season plays out to be when you get to the trade deadline, but it's actually a lot more than just $600,000. I'd bet it's more like triple or quadruple that.
Which, when you factor in as well that the portion of the players salary that will count against the cap has decreased at a coresponding rate, teams can actually add a fair amount of salary.