Nemec was 18 last year, Clarke is 20. The history of 18 year old defenseman in the NHL is not as strong as 18 year old forwards. I personally would have kept him in Europe, but we will see. The Devils made the best development choices with L Hughes, Hirschier and L Hughes, so I guess you trust them, we will see.
I'll ask you the same question, of all the high end players the Kings have had in the AHL, can you name a single one who has benefitted greatly from being there?
Byfield. Would you still have him down there with what you know now? Plenty of guys struggled bigtime in the NHL and have turned out way better than QB has with all the AHL time (Hughes, Seguin, Barkov, Thornton some of the notable ones).
Turcotte. You still think it was the right move?
Kaliyev. I'll give them a pass, they didn't have much choice. But did being down there really help him out much?
Bjornfot. He is a fringe player, basically at the same spot he was 4 years ago. Did he benefit at all from AHL time?
Can we agree that for whatever reason (we can disagree on that) the Kings players who have spent significant time in the AHL have for the most part failed to reach a level expected of them?
So why would anyone want Clarke down there?