Toggle sidebar

Training Camp 2023

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/
blackjackmulligan

blackjackmulligan

Registered User
Jun 17, 2022
3,291
1,532
deadhead said:
This looks like they're still looking at players and roles.
Don't have to make a decision until Monday.
Suspect Briere is keeping his phone close by. Allison and Laughton may have a market.

A lot of teams are close to the cap, and might want to work with a team that can absorb a million or two.
Click to expand...
will you please fn stop with the laughton trade BS. He isn't being moved anytime soon and 99.9% at all.

So what teams you think can create a market for Allison? I suspect every team has their own version of allison.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bennysflyers16 and Rich Nixon
deadhead

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
49,980
21,875
May be more a matter of chemistry, right now it's more a matter of three LW/C pairings, and the RWs may shuffle until they find the best fit. Of course, if Brink forces his way into the LW conversation, things change again.

Torts wants to play both Foerster and Brink or one would have been sent down already.
Atkinson can't be traded, can't be bought out this year, and Torts likes him and they want to see if he bounces back.
So that leaves Laughton as the odd man out, makes more sense to trade him than stick him at 4LW, but Briere may be patient, put Brink in LHV for a while waiting for a good offer.

Reason I don't buy Laughton for a 1st and 2nd - Schenn was a deal for a 1st and 2nd, with the 2nd pumped up to an expected late first by taking on Lehtera. So if St Louis valued Schenn that way, you know they'd have a lesser value on Laughton - which suggests a salary dump was part of the deal.

I'd be happy with a late first for Laughton, and a second asset if we take back a bad contract to enable a PO team to fit him under the cap.
 
blackjackmulligan

blackjackmulligan

Registered User
Jun 17, 2022
3,291
1,532
deadhead said:
May be more a matter of chemistry, right now it's more a matter of three LW/C pairings, and the RWs may shuffle until they find the best fit. Of course, if Brink forces his way into the LW conversation, things change again.

Torts wants to play both Foerster and Brink or one would have been sent down already.
Atkinson can't be traded, can't be bought out this year, and Torts likes him and they want to see if he bounces back.
So that leaves Laughton as the odd man out, makes more sense to trade him than stick him at 4LW, but Briere may be patient, put Brink in LHV for a while waiting for a good offer.

Reason I don't buy Laughton for a 1st and 2nd - Schenn was a deal for a 1st and 2nd, with the 2nd pumped up to an expected late first by taking on Lehtera. So if St Louis valued Schenn that way, you know they'd have a lesser value on Laughton - which suggests a salary dump was part of the deal.

I'd be happy with a late first for Laughton, and a second asset if we take back a bad contract to enable a PO team to fit him under the cap.
Click to expand...
laughton the odd man out. No one is buying it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tripod
Beef Invictus

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
129,392
168,984
Armored Train
deadhead said:
May be more a matter of chemistry, right now it's more a matter of three LW/C pairings, and the RWs may shuffle until they find the best fit. Of course, if Brink forces his way into the LW conversation, things change again.

Torts wants to play both Foerster and Brink or one would have been sent down already.
Atkinson can't be traded, can't be bought out this year, and Torts likes him and they want to see if he bounces back.
So that leaves Laughton as the odd man out, makes more sense to trade him than stick him at 4LW, but Briere may be patient, put Brink in LHV for a while waiting for a good offer.

Reason I don't buy Laughton for a 1st and 2nd - Schenn was a deal for a 1st and 2nd, with the 2nd pumped up to an expected late first by taking on Lehtera. So if St Louis valued Schenn that way, you know they'd have a lesser value on Laughton - which suggests a salary dump was part of the deal.

I'd be happy with a late first for Laughton, and a second asset if we take back a bad contract to enable a PO team to fit him under the cap.
Click to expand...

They are never trading Laughton. You have no understanding of how the team thinks or works. That's why you're wrong about everything all the time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kelmitchell2 and Tripod
freakydallas13

freakydallas13

Registered User
Jan 30, 2007
7,226
17,720
Victoria, BC
Beef Invictus said:
They are never trading Laughton. You have no understanding of how the team thinks or works. That's why you're wrong about everything all the time.
Click to expand...
I think there is a chance they trade Laughton, but that would be after they wait as long as possible and he returns a pittance compared to the numerous times much more was offered. The Simmonds special.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: Kelmitchell2, pit and Beef Invictus
Cody Webster

Cody Webster

Registered User
Jul 18, 2014
25,937
24,346
deadhead said:
This looks like they're still looking at players and roles.
Don't have to make a decision until Monday.
Suspect Briere is keeping his phone close by. Allison and Laughton may have a market.

A lot of teams are close to the cap, and might want to work with a team that can absorb a million or two.
Click to expand...
Laughton had a market last TDL, a first and a second to be exact, and they still didn't trade him. Why would they trade him now?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kelmitchell2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Ad

Latest posts

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

Top Bottom
X