Curufinwe
Registered User
- Feb 28, 2013
- 56,980
- 45,378
Either that or carrying 8 dmenMaybe they waived Allison in order to carry 3 goaltenders on the roster and not have to waive Sandstrom? I know it's stupid I'm just spit balling here.
Either that or carrying 8 dmenMaybe they waived Allison in order to carry 3 goaltenders on the roster and not have to waive Sandstrom? I know it's stupid I'm just spit balling here.
negative.....Nicky Da Cop STAYSShould have kept and waived Deslauriers instead.
Yes it is stupidMaybe they waived Allison in order to carry 3 goaltenders on the roster and not have to waive Sandstrom? I know it's stupid I'm just spit balling here.
Tortorella transforming himself into a developmental guru is as phony as it gets, but bless the hearts of the people eat it up. What are these "bad spots" for young players? They already aren't playing them on the 4th line (not that I think that's a bad spot). Then, we have sample sizes as arbitrary as 5-6 games before the revolving door comes into play. Guys like Tippett and Frost took 100 games to finally assert themselves at this level (with varying degrees of BS to deal with). They have no definition of what "hurting the kids" means. It'll be based on Tortorella's stomach acids that day.
Seems about right.This looks like they're still looking at players and roles.
Don't have to make a decision until Monday.
Suspect Briere is keeping his phone close by. Allison and Laughton may have a market.
A lot of teams are close to the cap, and might want to work with a team that can absorb a million or two.
Yeah, I don't think Allison being odd man out as a regular is too surprising, but him not being one of the two extras seems dumb. No one outside of Zamula (who should be a regular) really should be prioritized as an extra. If it's Sandstrom, their hesitancy to waive him at this point is just weird. Teams just don't really have room to make goalie claims. Meanwhile Allison is the only waiver guy Friedman has mentioned by name so pretty decent chance a "rebuilding" team is going to lose a young(ish), cost controlled skater for nothing.You'd imagine Brink and Foerster both made the team then...unless I'm missing something.
There is a huge difference between could and would.I was told that if the kids looked good, they could easily demote Nicky D.
Guess not
Except the report hasn't come out yet.Yeah, I don't think Allison being odd man out as a regular is too surprising, but him not being one of the two extras seems dumb. No one outside of Zamula (who should be a regular) really should be prioritized as an extra. If it's Sandstrom, their hesitancy to waive him at this point is just weird. Teams just don't really have room to make goalie claims. Meanwhile Allison is the only waiver guy Friedman has mentioned by name so pretty decent chance a "rebuilding" team is going to lose a young(ish), cost controlled skater for nothing.
Or they just want to wait to waive Sandstrom in hopes that he clearsIf they’re keeping Ersson and Sandstrom up, Hart is getting moved as soon as the results of the RC investigation is announced.
that's a stretch imo.If they’re keeping Ersson and Sandstrom up, Hart is getting moved as soon as the results of the RC investigation is announced.
If that is the case, it makes sense to waive him the same day as the Leafs waiving Jones.Or they just want to wait to waive Sandstrom in hopes that he clears
Pleasantly surprised at how much youth made the team despite the fact we waived the wrong player. I have a feeling d-lo goal saved his job
If the Flyers wait on Sandstrom the chances are better that another club will find a way to fit his salary in under the cap. Waiving him now would be the time to do it if they wanted to send him down.Or they just want to wait to waive Sandstrom in hopes that he clears