OptimusReim
Registered User
- Jul 13, 2011
- 111
- 131
We should definitely try to acquire McCann if Pittsburgh is leaving him unprotected.
Burke always loved Mikheyev when he was on TV, make it happen.
Really in general we should be targeting vulnerable forwards since we're in a good position protection wise.
Anyone else hoping to keep galchenyuk? What's that contract going to look like?
Yep, exactly.
You're not getting the Janmark, Martinook, Cizikas, Goodrow, etc type of quality bottom 6 forwards for ~750K-1M. You're getting them for ~1.5-2.25M. Sure, we could roll the dice on a bunch of cheap guys, but as was seen last year, only Spezza and Bogosian turned out to be decent/good, whereas Lehtonen, Barabanov, Thornton, Boyd, Vesey, etc wouldn't be taking regular shifts on a Stanley Cup winning team.
He’s awful. Beyond badWith Oilers smoke in mind, who here likes Khaira?
Will see a raise regardless of which way his RFA offseason goes, but certainly has the potential to be structured in a tight cap landscape.
Can you explain what you use to define this player as an elite 4th liner? Where does that idea come from?
Anyone else hoping to keep galchenyuk? What's that contract going to look like?
Danault would be the perfect 3rd line C for this team.
Because I fail to see how replacing a 90-100 point player with a guy who couldn't get more than 50 pre-MacKinnon breakout, and who is almost definitely going to be a more expensive Zack Hyman, actually helps the team. Yeah, you're freeing up salary, but you're still spending 80% of it on a guy who you're hoping can give you enough intangibles for a pretty big offensive dropoff. If you're going to trade Marner, do it for a D-man to rearrange the salary structure...Marner fan? I bet the combined return of Landy + whatever we get for Marner would make us a more balanced team.
Unfortunately it won't happen because Landy still wants too much for us and the term is going to be long.
yea, but he wants 'Hyman' money LoLDanault would be the perfect 3rd line C for this team.
How could it not be.I am sure that is a big hit in the Dubas haters club.
How could it not be.
Kyle Dubas has single handedly created a culture of mercenaries.
Even other teams are probably complaining about him. I’m sure Rantanen would be making less if not for Dubas’ stupidity. They would probably also have landeskog locked up as well.
Dubas has created a new measuring stick for salaries in the NHL.
Every player and agent in the league is laughing at him for it.
Because I fail to see how replacing a 90-100 point player with a guy who couldn't get more than 50 pre-MacKinnon breakout, and who is almost definitely going to be a more expensive Zack Hyman, actually helps the team. Yeah, you're freeing up salary, but you're still spending 80% of it on a guy who you're hoping can give you enough intangibles for a pretty big offensive dropoff. If you're going to trade Marner, do it for a D-man to rearrange the salary structure...
Lou Lam wouldn't have caved to Nylander, IMO. That's was the first mistake. Second was signing Matthews before Marner, Lou Lam would have known better there.He is not the one who asked for big money and were willing to sit if they didn't get it. That's on the players and their agents, and you are kidding yourself if you think a guy like Lou would have done it any differently. Well besides bridging them and then having to overpay them even more or run them to UFA, which is something he has done on numerous occasions.
I like Danault but he is getting stupid money this offseason. I forget the article but there were rumours of him turning down a long term deal at $5.5M and he wants the chance to be a top line center somewhere. We can't afford him.Danault would be the perfect 3rd line C for this team.
Of course agents ask for money.He is not the one who asked for big money and were willing to sit if they didn't get it. That's on the players and their agents, and you are kidding yourself if you think a guy like Lou would have done it any differently. Well besides bridging them and then having to overpay them even more or run them to UFA, which is something he has done on numerous occasions.
He's guilty of having multiple young players who are worth big money on the same team at the same time. Most GMs have to deal with one or maybe 2.
Lou Lam wouldn't have caved to Nylander, IMO. That's was the first mistake. Second was signing Matthews before Marner, Lou Lam would have known better there.
I'm sorry, but when you are talking about signing players, Lou Lam is not the example you use, unless its for albatross contracts for middle line playersLou Lam wouldn't have caved to Nylander, IMO. That's was the first mistake. Second was signing Matthews before Marner, Lou Lam would have known better there.
Lou Lam wouldn't have caved to Nylander, IMO. That's was the first mistake. Second was signing Matthews before Marner, Lou Lam would have known better there.
I'm sorry, but when you are talking about signing players, Lou Lam is not the example you use, unless its for albatross contracts for middle line players
for every decent deal he signs, he signs 2-3 really bad ones
Dont think Buffalo would.Would the Leafs ever consider Marner for Eichel? Would Buffalo?