DarkKnight
Professional Amateur
- Jan 17, 2017
- 34,660
- 55,479
Utah would never trade Crouse, but boy that would be a real coup to obtain him…….If the Leafs could find a way to get Lawson Crouse in a Liljegren deal that would be awesome.
Knies - Matthews - Marner
McMann- Domi - Nylander
Crouse - Tavares - Robertson
Lorentz - Holmberg/Kampf - Reaves
I think we're heading towards a Liljegren to Utah smoke show. I'd take our 2nd round pick back straight up at this rate. I would also ask about Soderstrom and/or Curtis Douglas.
I'd be fine with a 2nd.
Even if it makes the Leafs look foolish I don't see him breaking out with this coach and GM given their clear preference for other types of playing styles
A 2nd is an extremely high ask for Liljergren at this point. I think the absolute best case scenario is we get the Rangers 3rd.I think we're heading towards a Liljegren to Utah smoke show. I'd take our 2nd round pick back straight up at this rate. I would also ask about Soderstrom and/or Curtis Douglas.
How many 90th. overall picks become NHL defenders though?A 2nd is an extremely high ask for Liljergren at this point. I think the absolute best case scenario is we get the Rangers 3rd.
How many 90th. overall picks become NHL defenders though?
Prefer a prospect.
A 2nd is an extremely high ask for Liljergren at this point. I think the absolute best case scenario is we get the Rangers 3rd.
How many 90th. overall picks become NHL defenders though?
Prefer a prospect.
Completely agree, the Leafs must acquire Cap space.I mentioned Victor Soderstrom before... he's a prospect with probably some untapped upside. With that said, a 3rd round pick is just a prospect a few more years away. You get to control who you want and perhaps you get lucky.
I think the Leafs just need cap space and future ammo, whatever that might be we'll see.
I dont know If we would view Soderstrom as much of a prospect tbhThat's possible, it's hard to tell what his value is like and it depends on options they have available. It could always be conditional based on Utah's performance. I don't think the difference between 2nd and a 3rd is that extreme though.
I mentioned Victor Soderstrom before... he's a prospect with probably some untapped upside. With that said, a 3rd round pick is just a prospect a few more years away. You get to control who you want and perhaps you get lucky.
I think the Leafs just need cap space and future ammo, whatever that might be we'll see.
I dont know If we would view Soderstrom as much of a prospect tbh
He is 23 going 24 in his D+6 year playing in Europe after struggling in NHL/AHL.
He is only 2 drafts classes younger than Lilijgren
I would want back a player for Lilijgren ideally.
McBain if they value him a lot
Stenlund + 4th if they dont
Stenlund could be our 4C ideally for 2M and is a 6'5 player which Treliving and Berube would like
Make this trade and then deal Kampf for a 4th and 5th to get back some picks in the system
RHD depth being hurt could interest them in making a move and shift a forward player for a backend player.I'll be honest I haven't see a ton of Soderstrom and definitely doesn't have a lot of appeal at his stage of his career. Mostly just throwing a dart in the dark and hoping you land something. A smallish fast skating RHD with some skill, maybe he hits after changing teams. You can hope for a player back but typically at this point of the off-season teams are trying to compete and don't have a lot spare parts.
Utah in particular wants to replace LTIR players, not shift pieces around. They have a lot of prospects and picks to shop around... Liljegren isn't the only available defenseman for the right price. People want McBain but I don't see how that happens. They also just signed Stenlund... why would they trade him?
RHD depth being hurt could interest them in making a move and shift a forward player for a backend player.
Also when they signed him, Hayton looked like a bust again, but he has been good this year making their center deoth look better now
Leafs are a contending team, 3rd/4th rounders for liljjgren are not very enticing
A player like Stenlund that can come in and play with Lorentz and Dewar/Kampf/Jarnkrok to form a strong 4th line would be enticing for us
Of course we are the ones with a constraint. Eventually Dewar and Jarnkrok will be back so will need to make a trade one way or another.
Yes, they have some prospects that are interesting, but if he goes for a mid-round pick, then there's very little point.I would want back a player for Lilijgren ideally.