rumman
Registered User
- Sep 10, 2008
- 16,494
- 12,917
“On principle” I’m too old for this shit…….On principal, Provorov is a no go.
Jiricek is the one they should be looking at on CBJ.
“On principle” I’m too old for this shit…….On principal, Provorov is a no go.
Jiricek is the one they should be looking at on CBJ.
Quick Shifts: Is a Timothy Liljegren trade coming?
Maple Leafs at crossroad with Liljegren | Ryan Reaves runs Fight Club 101 | Playoff picks | High-stakes goalie gambles | Toronto's power-play concerns + 7 more NHL goodies...www.sportsnet.ca
1. Where do the Toronto Maple Leafs and Timothy Liljegren go from here?
Even with a third-pairing, right-shot defenceman more suited to the GM and coach's vision injured (off-season recruit Jani Hakanpää), Liljegren couldn't squeeze into the lineup on the club's first road trip.
The 2017 first-rounder has been leapfrogged not only by Conor Timmins (a decent puck-mover who can ill afford to keep averaging one bad penalty per game) but perhaps the bigger and cheaper Philippe Myers as well.
Yes, Brad Treliving is working the phones trying to move Liljegren and his $3-million cap hit, but if it were that easy to trade a third-pair D-man with a second-pair salary, it would've happened already.
There isn't urgency yet, but there could be soon.
Toronto is maxed out in NHL contracts and cap space, and eventually LTIR players like Hakanpää, Connor Dewar, and Calle Järnkrok will be healthy.
None of those players can be activated for nine more games, so Treliving has time.
Should another Leaf get injured in the meantime, the pressure to move Liljegren gets delayed. Maybe one of the league's other 31 teams falls victim to injuries and gets desperate for a righty (the L.A. Kings already lost a good one.) And, heck, there is still very much a chance the team needs him. He's a useful NHL-level talent, and at age 25, his best games should still rest ahead.
Ultimately, however, we don't see a long-term future here between an inconsistent — and, likely, frustrated, player — and a regime that didn't draft him.
Berube — who won his Cup with a bunch of big, nasty D-men — has made it clear that he prefers his blueliners huge. ("They get in the way," he chuckles.) Ditto for Treliving.
So, the Leafs are willing to play this out for at least a couple weeks, but at some point something must change.
Either Liljegren gets into the lineup and fights for more work, or he falls victim to a cap crunch and gets a fresh start in a different sweater.
“On principle” I’m too old for this shit…….
I could explain it, but then I’d be penalized……Yeah, I'm not sure what the principle is there, but whatever.
I don't really want to derail the thread, but that's how I feel about that player.Yeah, I'm not sure what the principle is there, but whatever.
So you don’t like players with differing views then yours?I don't really want to derail the thread, but that's how I feel about that player.
I'm fine with him expressing his POV, but I don't have to like it.So you don’t like players with differing views then yours?
See I would want at least a 2nd or 3rd+4th for him because I have a feeling he's going to do better elsewhere but we might get squeezed if we get healthier and guys start coming back.
The problem is if he isn't playing and we're paying him 3M this year and next that seriously harms his value
I think he may do alright somewhere else but he isn't going to do it here and that 3M has value to us
I'm at the point where I'd happily let him go for nothing just to get the cap space and roster spot
The nothing part would have been easier for me to sign off on in the summer when we could have solidified RD with Roy and Tanev.
We should maybe do pump and dump? Give him heavy offensive zone starts, PP1 etc, inflate his stats and then see if that gets us a better return.
I am not sure why you have OEL on this list. We are lucky to have him and I have believe be is playing as well or better than Roy or Skjei are so far. The other three on your list save us $8M and two of them aren't even in the lineup right now. We could use that space to add to this the D. Can we get a top four D now and run a third pair of OEL and Hakanpaa? That seems interesting.That's what I thought we may do, inflate his stats and entice some sucker to take him off our hands but I don't think Berube is built that way
What a waste, when I think of the guys we could have gone after with that extra money I cringe
OEL + Liljegren is over 6M
Liljegren + Jarnkrok is over 5M
Liljegren + Kampf is 5.4M
That's middle 6C or middle pair RD money
How come?I think Liljegren for Pettersson might happen as soon as the pens almost as soon as American thanksgiving.
How come?
He’ll go after Engvall first.Feeling that Dubas might be the only GM who wants Liljegren for more than peanuts. I also think the leafs might value Pettersson.
I am not sure why you have OEL on this list. We are lucky to have him and I have believe be is playing as well or better than Roy or Skjei are so far. The other three on your list save us $8M and two of them aren't even in the lineup right now. We could use that space to add to this the D. Can we get a top four D now and run a third pair of OEL and Hakanpaa? That seems interesting.
We may be OK at C with Matthews, Tavares, Domi, Holmberg, Lorentz, Dewar and Minten. We shouldn't forget about what he could bring if some ice time and opportunities open up.
So some people like what Timmins is delivering or is it somewhere else?
That's what I thought we may do, inflate his stats and entice some sucker to take him off our hands but I don't think Berube is built that way
What a waste, when I think of the guys we could have gone after with that extra money I cringe
OEL + Liljegren is over 6M
Liljegren + Jarnkrok is over 5M
Liljegren + Kampf is 5.4M
That's middle 6C or middle pair RD money
Knowing Jarnkrok + Liljegren nearly covers Matt Roy is rather frustrating.
It doesn't really.
1. Jarnkrok currently does not fit on the Leafs roster / cap hit at all. In order to bring him off LTIR, they have to clear $2.1m in space. He's basically an "extra part" from a cap space standpoint right now.
2. Even if the Leafs had room for Jarnkrok on the current roster, you can't just "combine" 2 players salaries for one. You've still got to fill out a roster, which typically means replacing Jarnkrok with a replacement-level player.
3. Matt Roy apparently chose Washington over Toronto, sighting a preference to play in the States. He signed for $5.75m in Washington. Let's say it took $6.5m to get him here.. to fit that kind of hit in, you're looking at Liljegren ($3m), OEL to "Myers" ($2.725m), and probably David Kampf out as well.... given that neither McMann or Reaves gets you quite there.
We offered more than Jarnkrok and Lily's combined salaries to Roy and he chose elsewhereKnowing Jarnkrok + Liljegren nearly covers Matt Roy is rather frustrating.
I did say nearlyWe offered more than Jarnkrok and Lily's combined salaries to Roy and he chose elsewhere