Trades and UFA’s - Trade Deadline Edition

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/
Status
Not open for further replies.

Fogelhund

Registered User
Sep 15, 2007
22,763
26,371
They are now, but I would bet on that changing in R1. Even if the Leafs don't add a C I can't see Keefe going with Domi at C on the road, and he certainly won't continue to run Bertuzzi - Domi - Nylander who have been outscored and outchanced together.

Actually, they haven't been outscored...
 
  • Like
Reactions: bax and arso40

Scion

Registered User
May 25, 2012
2,733
1,464
Actually, they haven't been outscored...
You are right, they are +1 together (7 GF, 6GA). Let's look at their underlying numbers:

5.43 xGA (3.09 xGF)
36.29 xGF%
23 HDCA (12 HDCF)
44.50 CF%
42.36 FF%
65.38 OZ%

Now here are Nylander and Bertuzzi's numbers without Domi:

18 GF (12 GA)
22.42 xGF (15.41 xGA)
59.26 xGF%
108 HDCF (67 HDCA)
54.68 CF%
55.50 FF%
54.44 OZ%
 

jaric1862

Registered User
Jan 14, 2014
4,181
1,934
I was high on Jensen at 2.5m before his move to Washington. Now he's more of what we already have and I don't believe he's the guy for Rielly. There are options in the UFA market for similar price point that won't cost us assets.

100% agree on this. He's a Brodie/Liljergren type and we need another McCabe/Benoit/Lyubushkin type.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leaffan1991 and Roo

Roo

Registered User
Oct 3, 2005
3,794
833
Oakville
At this point, it am convinced that ‘impact’ rentals just don’t work. At least not for us. I’m fully content adding depth only (particularly if they add toughness) at the deadline. I’d look to the offseason to make bigger moves, and I think the leafs will be smart about it.
 

nuck

Schrodingers Cat
Aug 18, 2005
11,595
2,646
You are right, they are +1 together (7 GF, 6GA). Let's look at their underlying numbers:

5.43 xGA (3.09 xGF)
36.29 xGF%
23 HDCA (12 HDCF)
44.50 CF%
42.36 FF%
65.38 OZ%

Now here are Nylander and Bertuzzi's numbers without Domi:

18 GF (12 GA)
22.42 xGF (15.41 xGA)
59.26 xGF%
108 HDCF (67 HDCA)
54.68 CF%
55.50 FF%
54.44 OZ%
Is the bottom with Tavares or Matthews or both?
 

MarMarSab3

formerly #13 & TML4EVR
Sponsor
Feb 27, 2002
4,739
2,292
Toronto
Knies Matthews Marner
Bertuzzi Domi Nylander
McMann Tavares Jarnkrok
Holmberg Kampf Reaves

I'm pleased enough with the forward group, Tavares is where he belongs which is on the 3rd line playing with speedy wingers that will make up for his speed and defensive flaws. Would an upgrade at 2C be beneficial?absolutely however none out there available that are better then Domi. The clear necessary upgrade is still a top 4 RD .
 

Avilaj07

Registered User
Feb 6, 2016
2,075
1,594
To Toronto-
Larsson
Borgen
Tanev

To Seattle-
Robertson
Liljegren
Jarnkrok
Brodie
Niemela
1st Round Pick

Knies-Matthews-Marner
Bertuzzi-Domi-Nylander
Mcmann-Tavares-Tanev
Holmberg-Kampf-Reaves

Rielly-Larsson
McCabe-Borgen
Benoit-Lyubushkin
 
  • Wow
Reactions: aingefan

Scion

Registered User
May 25, 2012
2,733
1,464
100% agree on this. He's a Brodie/Liljergren type and we need another McCabe/Benoit/Lyubushkin type.
Jensen is solid, but I don't know how much he moves the needle. Given the assets and cap it will cost the Leafs should look at better options or just wait till July to sign one of the many better options available.
 

LeafChief

Matthew Knies Enthusiast
Mar 5, 2013
14,644
22,894
Scarborough
To Toronto-
Larsson
Borgen
Tanev

To Seattle-
Robertson
Liljegren
Jarnkrok
Brodie
Niemela
1st Round Pick

Knies-Matthews-Marner
Bertuzzi-Domi-Nylander
Mcmann-Tavares-Tanev
Holmberg-Kampf-Reaves

Rielly-Larsson
McCabe-Borgen
Benoit-Lyubushkin
The fact that you continue to post trade proposals is both shocking and admirable.
 

Fogelhund

Registered User
Sep 15, 2007
22,763
26,371
You are right, they are +1 together (7 GF, 6GA). Let's look at their underlying numbers:

5.43 xGA (3.09 xGF)
36.29 xGF%
23 HDCA (12 HDCF)
44.50 CF%
42.36 FF%
65.38 OZ%

Now here are Nylander and Bertuzzi's numbers without Domi:

18 GF (12 GA)
22.42 xGF (15.41 xGA)
59.26 xGF%
108 HDCF (67 HDCA)
54.68 CF%
55.50 FF%
54.44 OZ%

Money Puck has it at 7GF 5A... I'm not sure why the variance.

When you look at the stats... Bertuzzi Tavares and Nylander look quite good.
McMann Tavares Jarnkrok is a very small sample, but also good.
Robertson Domi Jarnkrok were also good..

But the thing is... we've been winning with these lines, no matter what the stats say.. but there is options...

To Toronto-
Larsson
Borgen
Tanev

To Seattle-
Robertson
Liljegren
Jarnkrok
Brodie
Niemela
1st Round Pick

Knies-Matthews-Marner
Bertuzzi-Domi-Nylander
Mcmann-Tavares-Tanev
Holmberg-Kampf-Reaves

Rielly-Larsson
McCabe-Borgen
Benoit-Lyubushkin

It's amazing that you just continue to want to give away everything, particularly the potential ELC guys... when we need them for cap reasons. These are just crazy proposals.
 

Scion

Registered User
May 25, 2012
2,733
1,464
Money Puck has it at 7GF 5A... I'm not sure why the variance.

When you look at the stats... Bertuzzi Tavares and Nylander look quite good.
McMann Tavares Jarnkrok is a very small sample, but also good.
Robertson Domi Jarnkrok were also good..

But the thing is... we've been winning with these lines, no matter what the stats say.. but there is options...
We've been winning in spite of them not because of them. Last night they were the worst line by a country mile, and it's been that way for most of the past two weeks. Unfortunately the Leafs don't have a third center that can give the lines balance so Domi gets the gig by default. I think Holmberg could eventually be that guy, but they don't seem to want to break up his partnership with Kampf, plus it's alot to ask from a rookie.
 

Fogelhund

Registered User
Sep 15, 2007
22,763
26,371
Toronto - Carlson (@7M)
Washington - Mikhayev + Laegesson + Minten + 1st (tor)
Vancouver - Brodie

McCabe-Carlson
Rielly-Lybushkin
Benoit-Liljgren

Vancouver has 8 D already on their roster, and Soucy coming back from LTIR sometime late this month, or early in March... they have no need for Brodie, so no idea why this interests them.

Carlson is such a weird add, particularly costing us Minten and our 1st.... It's just not a good idea at all.

We've been winning in spite of them not because of them. Last night they were the worst line by a country mile, and it's been that way for most of the past two weeks. Unfortunately the Leafs don't have a third center that can give the lines balance so Domi gets the gig by default. I think Holmberg could eventually be that guy, but they don't seem to want to break up his partnership with Kampf, plus it's alot to ask from a rookie.
and yet.. .what 9-1 in the last ten, despite the lineup? I think they like the offensive side of these guys... but they need Nylander in particular to be the D guy on this line... I mean, unless you swap Bertuzzi and Jarnkrok, and then bring the defensive side of Jarnkrok there... and create a Tavares Bertuzzi McMann line? Which could be a handful.
 

Scion

Registered User
May 25, 2012
2,733
1,464
Vancouver has 8 D already on their roster, and Soucy coming back from LTIR sometime late this month, or early in March... they have no need for Brodie, so no idea why this interests them.

Carlson is such a weird add, particularly costing us Minten and our 1st.... It's just not a good idea at all.


and yet.. .what 9-1 in the last ten, despite the lineup? I think they like the offensive side of these guys... but they need Nylander in particular to be the D guy on this line... I mean, unless you swap Bertuzzi and Jarnkrok, and then bring the defensive side of Jarnkrok there... and create a Tavares Bertuzzi McMann line? Which could be a handful.
My issue is in the playoffs. I think the Leafs can get away with that line in the regular season, though it's still not an optimal arrangement.
 

Avilaj07

Registered User
Feb 6, 2016
2,075
1,594
Money Puck has it at 7GF 5A... I'm not sure why the variance.

When you look at the stats... Bertuzzi Tavares and Nylander look quite good.
McMann Tavares Jarnkrok is a very small sample, but also good.
Robertson Domi Jarnkrok were also good..

But the thing is... we've been winning with these lines, no matter what the stats say.. but there is options...



It's amazing that you just continue to want to give away everything, particularly the potential ELC guys... when we need them for cap reasons. These are just crazy proposals.
Actually, if you look out the money in vs money out, we'd only be adding roughly 800k in salary, not to mention that the 3 players we'd be receiving are all signed past this season which gives us a lot more clarity regarding our cap for next season.
 

Killswitch

Registered User
May 22, 2022
122
147
Just reading Arizona's trade thread, they're looking for, and would feel lucky to get, a 3rd and a cap dump for Dumba. They definitely want him gone. No idea why any insiders would push a 1st except to keep lines open for future insider bs
 

SprDaVE

Moderator
Sep 20, 2008
53,682
36,736
At this point, it am convinced that ‘impact’ rentals just don’t work. At least not for us. I’m fully content adding depth only (particularly if they add toughness) at the deadline. I’d look to the offseason to make bigger moves, and I think the leafs will be smart about it.

I'd look at flipping Abruzzese and Hirvonen whether it's for an equally valued AHLer (preferably defenseman), a pick or perhaps a rental/upgrade somewhere if at all possible.

Steeves is probably included in this but I think he's the AAA call-up right now and you never know how much injuries can pile up. I'd also like to see him get another shot to make the Leafs full time next year because I do think he has some good qualities to be useful.
 
Last edited:

Menzinger

Kessel4LadyByng
Apr 24, 2014
41,872
34,159
St. Paul, MN
Stamkos is a no from me. He's falling harder than Tavares at this point. Still putting up points, but he's a winger, and his defense has taken a nose dive. He's a -24 on the season, and I appreciate that +- isn't the be all and end all... but come on with him.

He also had his chance to come here and snubbed the Leafs. No thanks from me too.
 

Fogelhund

Registered User
Sep 15, 2007
22,763
26,371
Actually, if you look out the money in vs money out, we'd only be adding roughly 800k in salary, not to mention that the 3 players we'd be receiving are all signed past this season which gives us a lot more clarity regarding our cap for next season.
That's great... but then you've got to replace forwards going out next year... and where we had ELC's, we will need free agents... it just isn't a great idea to get of all of those guys, and you certainly don't make that kind of a drastic move this late in the season.

My issue is in the playoffs. I think the Leafs can get away with that line in the regular season, though it's still not an optimal arrangement.
I mean... keep on using it, keep on winning, and keep on holding those players accountable to play D properly too.. If the team is winning, and we can get those guys to tighten up, maybe it works... and if not, change the lines, which isn't hard.
 
  • Like
Reactions: aingefan

Fogelhund

Registered User
Sep 15, 2007
22,763
26,371
I'd look at flipping Abruzzese and/or Hirvonen whether it's for an equally valued AHLer (preferably defenseman), a pick or perhaps a rental/upgrade somewhere if at all possible.

Steeves is probably included in this but I think he's the AAA call-up right now and you never know how much injuries can pile up. I'd also like to see him get another shot to make the Leafs full time next year because I do think he has some good qualities to be useful.

To me, those are offseason moves. Abruzzese and Hirvonen don't even become RFA's until the end of next year. Let the continue with the Marlies, and then decide what to do from there. See if there are moves, or if they help the Marlies, or whether you can upgrade... cheap controlled contracts, and we aren't getting much back for them.

I don't think Steeves has a place here either... I'd probably keep him too, and see if there is a weaker team that might be interested in the offseason, where he could have a better chance of making a lineup.
 

Scion

Registered User
May 25, 2012
2,733
1,464
Just reading Arizona's trade thread, they're looking for, and would feel lucky to get, a 3rd and a cap dump for Dumba. They definitely want him gone. No idea why any insiders would push a 1st except to keep lines open for future insider bs
A 3rd and a sweetener to retain makes sense to me as well. Still not sure I'd do it though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BayStBullies

Scion

Registered User
May 25, 2012
2,733
1,464
It’s a legitimate question. What do your lines look like with a 3C? Where does Domi play?
Knies - Matthews - Marner
Bertuzzi - Tavares - Nylander
Domi - XXXXXXXX - Jarnkrok
Holmberg - Kampf - McMann

The other option is to make Domi the 4C, and use Kampf in a match-up role, but that wouldn't be my first choice.

Holmberg - Kampf - Jarnkrok
Robertson - Domi - McMann
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad