nuck
Schrodingers Cat
- Aug 18, 2005
- 11,619
- 2,661
Isn't that a reason to move Marner so they can upgrade all that fluff? Is there a more overpaid core in the league? No room to build when your best players get millions in raises without the team ever improving. He gets 8 years NM @ $12+ so essentially they are frozen to this kind of lineup until Matthews leaves. I thought Willie being moved was the change that had to happen but then Tre got high and handed him that nifty contract.Marner would beat the other 9 forwards not named matthews nylander tavares all on his own
Pick any star player from any core in the league and they smash through that 9 players of fluff (No offence to Knies, his day will come).
Marner stays.
People seem to think that the cap will grow but the cost of adding new players won't increase with it. The big 3 will keep them in the same poverty cycle because they don't have value deals on important pieces to balance out past spending mistakes, and they can't seem to quit making those mistakes.
I am trying to get my head around how they can handle Mitch's next deal and still make meaningful improvements to the lineup. Marner is great, but his money isn't. But I don't think he is gone so long as Shanny is still here so its probably a moot point.
Last edited: