Toggle sidebar

Trades and UFA’s - Trade Deadline Edition

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
  • We are currently aware of "log in/security error" issues that are affecting some users. We apologize and ask for your patience as we try to get these issues fixed.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Evilhomer said:
It wouldn't make sense for Calgary to trade them in a single deal. They would recoup more assets trading them separately.
Click to expand...
Robertson , Minten and a first is a serious haul. Also they are hitting free agency it's not like they are controlled. Might get close to nothing for Tanev given his injury history.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Enniskillen, Taylor Halls Teeth, Phion Keneuf and 1 other person
Darcy Tucker said:
Robertson , Minten and a first is a serious haul. Also they are hitting free agency it's not like they are controlled. Might get close to nothing for Tanev given his injury history.
Click to expand...
If this were actually on the table, it would have been done already as the Leafs would do this deal all day every day,
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leaffan1991
Bluebear said:
the budget version is unlikely to bring a cup this year. the D will still be suspect and this trade will just make it harder to make moves that will move the needle in the right direction down the road.... should just stand pat or sell. If a cup is won this season it will be a hand of God intervention where the big contracts step up and the goaltending stands on their head...
Click to expand...
not really it clears out 3.5m in Timmins and Kampf for next year, flexible to keep the new guys if they work.

Believe it or not we’re a top 5 offence and a little defensive stability and character guys could go a long way, may not lead to a cup but need to be more competitive going into and through the playoffs.
 
LeafChief said:
Laughton and/or Ristolainen would be the perfect blend of expensive and underwhelming. It's a pass for me on both.
Click to expand...
People have been begging for Laughton for years on this board. He’s not having a banner season. I think smart hockey folks are willing to bet he can improve on his play.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leaffan1991
Laughton Risto and Tanev would be a decent enough change for this year. Out I'm assuming Brodie, Robertson.

Domi Matthews Marner
Bertuzzi Tavares Nylander
Knies Laughton Jarnkrok
Gregor Kampf Holmberg
Reeves

Rielly Tanev
McCabe Lilly
Benoit Risto
Gio
 
Evilhomer said:
It wouldn't make sense for Calgary to trade them in a single deal. They would recoup more assets trading them separately.
Click to expand...
This would fall along the lines of a 1st and two 2nds (and the 2nds already have some NHL experience). Not a bad return at all for Calgary IMO (which isn't to necessarily state that I'd like for Toronto to do this).
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: thewave and Darcy Tucker
Menzinger said:
Brodie is probably easily included in most deals for a D man. The receiving team could still likely flip him for a late round pick

If Tre wants to bring in a couple players, I can see it happening that way
Click to expand...
Brodie might be a fail-to-report situation, in which case they would have to pay to dump him.

That would make things tricky cause Tre can't fully remake the defense while he's still here.
 
LeafEgo said:
Brodie might be a fail-to-report situation, in which case they would have to pay to dump him.

That would make things tricky cause Tre can't fully remake the defense while he's still here.
Click to expand...

If the other team is not a playoff team, they would likely just deal him elsewhere or waive him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Ad

Ad

Top Bottom