Dekes For Days
Registered User
- Sep 24, 2018
- 21,442
- 16,140
He picked up some fluky points but actually played pretty poorly in his only playoff appearance.Bertuzzi can actually handle playoff hockey whereas previous depth shrivel up and die.
He picked up some fluky points but actually played pretty poorly in his only playoff appearance.Bertuzzi can actually handle playoff hockey whereas previous depth shrivel up and die.
He picked up some fluky points but actually played pretty poorly in his only playoff appearance.
Considering he’s supposedly an asset faceoff wise, it’s interesting he has the worst percentage of our four centers. Apart from his PK work, guy has been mostly useless this year. Really disappointing, and his line still gave up goals post Reaves out, says a lot too. He isn’t a positive atm.
That's not what I claim, and there's no such thing as "good luck guys". Fluking into some points during one 7 game stretch doesn't mean he's going to do it again.He picked up 10 fluky points in 7 games.
Considering you’re the guy who claims we only lose every year due to bad luck, you’d think you be in favour of adding some good luck guys!
I thought we were trying to make the D better? This doesn't do that.Laughton + Ristolainen(retained)
Isn’t a terrible add to this team.
Kampf + Liljgren + 1st
Some may think that’s rich, but Laughton will be a playoff type 3C and top PK guy. Risto retained, would be fun to see if he finds his game. Hes a prick
His points weren't all fluky... actually, just watched, and some were pretty good....He picked up some fluky points but actually played pretty poorly in his only playoff appearance.
His points weren't all fluky... actually, just watched, and some were pretty good....
If you really want to break it down, six of his ten points were on the PP... where he just isn't going to get much time at all here.He did okay.
They didn't make the 2nd. round though.
He was a minus player.
It wasn't like Treliving struck gold with the signing, but if he can do something in the playoffs, for the Leafs, we shouldn't complain.
All points fluky? No. Fluky to get the point totals he did? Absolutely. His point totals were fueled by a 100% IPP at 5v5, and standing around in front of the net on a blazing hot PP unit and like quadrupling his normal PP production rate. And that's great and I'll take any goals I can get in the playoffs from any player for any reason, but he also played pretty poorly in that series, and nothing about his production was sustainable. It's not representative of him being some super playoff player, and there's no reason to think the same thing is going to happen again.His points weren't all fluky... actually, just watched, and some were pretty good....
At this point of the season we're in time will tell mode. I'm betting in favor of BertHe picked up some fluky points but actually played pretty poorly in his only playoff appearance.
I watched them play?? Isn't that what every opinion is? I'd add for two of them, they've looked like shit when they've been up, so there is empirical evidence as well. Once again, we're hyping Marlie plugs. They're warm bodies, you aren't winning anything if that's your lineup filler. I just don't think it's a wise strategy to think you can bring these guys in in the cheap and succeed. It's very risky, maybe they surprise.How would we ever know, rather than personal speculation?
That fair for sure.You have to look into the face-off percentage though.
He takes most of the Short Handed Face-offs, meaning of course the other team has their best players out.
You know he's 80% on the PowerPlay for face-offs?
Minimum 200 face-offs:
View attachment 814963
All points fluky? No. Fluky to get the point totals he did? Absolutely. His point totals were fueled by a 100% IPP at 5v5, and standing around in front of the net on a blazing hot PP unit and like quadrupling his normal PP production rate. And that's great and I'll take any goals I can get in the playoffs from any player for any reason, but he also played pretty poorly in that series, and nothing about his production was sustainable. It's not representative of him being some super playoff player, and there's no reason to think the same thing is going to happen again.
I have to say that Benoit might be Treliving's best signing?If you really want to break it down, six of his ten points were on the PP... where he just isn't going to get much time at all here.
He hasn't played very well for us at all, just hasn't found chemistry with his linemates.
I watched them play?? Isn't that what every opinion is? I'd add for two of them, they've looked like shit when they've been up, so there is empirical evidence as well. Once again, we're hyping Marlie plugs. They're warm bodies, you aren't winning anything if that's your lineup filler. I just don't think it's a wise strategy to think you can bring these guys in in the cheap and succeed. It's very risky, maybe they surprise.
We've had a lot of "garbage" Marlies players, not show much here, or marginal players not show much here, and then go on to success elsewhere. Then we lament their loss.
So quick to judge and throw people out, and then quick to blame we've moved on from players who ended up actually being useful.
We've had a lot of "garbage" Marlies players, not show much here, or marginal players not show much here, and then go on to success elsewhere. Then we lament their loss.
So quick to judge and throw people out, and then quick to blame we've moved on from players who ended up actually being useful.
Mason Marchment says hi............We've had a lot of "garbage" Marlies players, not show much here, or marginal players not show much here, and then go on to success elsewhere. Then we lament their loss.
So quick to judge and throw people out, and then quick to blame we've moved on from players who ended up actually being useful.
Keefe can't develop talent, among his other many flaws..........Yeah, right now it isn't like the team is loaded with top end players outside the top 6.
Perhaps too soon for someone like Niemela, but not too soon to pull the plug on Giordano?
Giordano can have questionable performances, as can Brodie, but the callups have to be near perfect.
Leafs have proven with the current coach, they will not give time for the prospects to transition, and thus they get their feet under them with another team.
It's a big reason I wouldn't want to move on from anyone with Keefe as our coach. Only the "big 4" seem to thrive offensively under Keefe, I want to see what someone else could do.
Yeah, right now it isn't like the team is loaded with top end players outside the top 6.
Perhaps too soon for someone like Niemela, but not too soon to pull the plug on Giordano?
Giordano can have questionable performances, as can Brodie, but the callups have to be near perfect.
Leafs have proven with the current coach, they will not give time for the prospects to transition, and thus they get their feet under them with another team.
Domi has 4 goals
Bertuzzi has 6 goals
Domi on pace for 7 goals, with over a minute per game on the PP.
Sorry we can’t move on from Keefe for another year or two at least, Tre needs to “keep a bullet in the chamber” for his own personal job security.
I get bringing D in slowly, they need to learn read the game to be safe enough to play in big minutes. But when we’re talking about the Moore, Holmberg, McMann, Tverberg types, you want violent young men with a chip on their shoulder and something to prove, not experienced broken down 30 year olds that can’t skate or forecheck anymore.
That's not what I claim, and there's no such thing as "good luck guys". Fluking into some points during one 7 game stretch doesn't mean he's going to do it again.
I am more so curious about the goalie conundrum when Woll is finally able to play. I am assuming we are going to be carrying 3 goalies forward or Jones go on the waivers?
Domi is scoring at half a PPG, or don't we count assists now?
I guess that doesn't fit the narrative your trying to push
Bertuzzi has been bad, but what that has to do with Kampf pacing for about 15 ******* points in an entire season is beyond me