ToneDog
56 years and counting. #FireTheShanaClan!
Nylander > Connor because he is the better playmaker, but Connor is in the same ballpark. In two years you can afford to pay 16, 34 and Connor what he is worth. The problem with Willie is he is not softening yet and the closer we get to the TDL, the more leverage he has. IMO, once the TDL passes, there is no reason for Willie not to test free agency (see John Tavares and Johnny Hockey). I'd rather be left with Connor who probably scores 50 as a Leaf.I was using his premise of 8x9M
Nylander for Connor is still not interesting. 1 because we are not getting a plus with Connor. 2 because as I said, Connor in two years is going to have the same amount of negotiating leverage nylander has now, maybe even more, but against a cap that could be as much as nearly $10M higher.
It solves 1 crunch year but is unlikely to work out for us over term. We are better to sign our guy.