The Ristolainen chatter - if we use the Kevin Hayes trade from the summer as a template (50% retention and Philly only got a 6th), is that worth the risk?
Essentially it would be Risto for 3 more years at ~2.55M, which is an overpay for a #5 dman, so you'd have to be confident he could be at least a #4. The "tools" are obviously enticing (big body, big shot, decent skater, physical, etc), but he obviously has severe decision making, hockey IQ, positional, etc issues. In Philly, it does seem he's been able to improve defensively, but his offence has also significantly dried up. I haven't followed Philly closely, but I'd imagine the messaging from the coaching staff to Risto is to try to keep things as simple as possible, reduce the decisions he has to make, and let him rely on those "tools" he has. Not sure if anyone has any thoughts specifically on how he's played in Philly under Torts, vs the historical player (who we obviously wouldn't want).
So if that's what the trade offer was - I'd be trying to figure out if we think he can play a top 4 role on a contender, and also comparing it to what you could likely get in free agency for ~2.5M over multiple years.