ACC1224
Super Elite, Passing ALL Tests since 2002
- Aug 19, 2002
- 75,952
- 42,041
I've seen 6 Super Bowls, I'll take it.payback for all your "good fortune.........."
This is just a bump in the road for them, been a great run.
I've seen 6 Super Bowls, I'll take it.payback for all your "good fortune.........."
He's also now being deployed differently so that will influence defensive #'s.
Look at his defensive zone start % but moreso the crazy difference in on the fly start % compared to before.
View attachment 779275
Liam Foudy is not good. He is very fast but not a good hockey player. Not worth it unless they want to try to get him to the Marlies.
Far too expensive to be played in this role.How do we feel about grabbing both Tanevs..
Gregor - Kampf - Tanev
Rielly - Tanev
Ristolainen??? #4 how much is his contract again that would be one of the stupidest moves they could do in an all in scenarioShave a mil off Brandon Tanev's cap hit and it looks easier to digest. That would probably make the deal too expensive to be worth it with all the Leafs young forwards and cheaper ways to fill a 4th line hole.
To keep harping on Tanev and Risto added. They have already tried to add a Tanev/Zadorov package this season, along with Schenn/Gudas this summer. I think they want that tough defenseman. If they both came in. Tanev and Brodie would be the #2/3 guys. 20-22 minutes a night. Ristolainen would be your #4 and McCabe your #5 guys on the depth chart between 18-20 minutes a night. It lines up pretty nice 1-7.
His contract at full hit 5.1M cap hit for 4 seasons including this one. I don't think he's worth the gamble at the cap hit. I'd assume significant retention 2.55M - 4M. Somewhere between those numbers over 4 years at his age is alright. That contract compares favorably to the Schenn and Gudas deals and likely whatever Zadorov signs for who the Leafs have all been connected too. I'd be willing to gamble Ristolainen is better than them.Ristolainen??? #4 how much is his contract again that would be one of the stupidest moves they could do in an all in scenario
His contract at full hit 5.1M cap hit for 4 seasons including this one. I don't think he's worth the gamble at the cap hit. I'd assume significant retention 2.55M - 4M. Somewhere between those numbers over 4 years at his age is alright. That contracts compare favorably to the Schenn and Gudas deals and likely whatever Zadorov signs for who the Leafs have all been connected too. I'd be willing to gamble Ristolainen is better than them.
Only trade for him if its at 50% retained and they give us either Cutter Guaither or their 2024 unprotected 1stRistolainen is a very, very bad idea.
That's true... but do we really need a guy who needs sheltering like that? At that cap hit? We need a big guy who can hit... and can be used heavily in the D zone... not sheltered like that... but I guess congrats to Philly for polishing a turd a little.
Ristolainen is a very, very bad idea.
There is almost like no chance we'll ever see Jenner being traded away from them....I would LOVE him but just can't see it at all.Jenner + Peeke. Would be a home run.
They're not going to trade Bertuzzi imo. Brodie. I think they wouldI know we wouldn't have the guts to do sell and retool, but if we lose any more bodies to injury what could we expect back in trade for guys like Bertuzzi and Brodie at the deadline?
I wasn't asking if we would do it, I was asking what they could get back in a hypothetical trade.They're not going to trade Bertuzzi imo. Brodie. I think they would
Bertuzzi has an NMC anyway, so it's quite difficult to move him.They're not going to trade Bertuzzi imo. Brodie. I think they would
Well that makes it really tricky. What position would we want? Or just draft picks? Or are we attaching him to someone else?I wasn't asking if we would do it, I was asking what they could get back in a hypothetical trade.
I was thinking picks or prospects standard rental price. Would a first rounder be too much to ask for either?Well that makes it really tricky. What position would we want? Or just draft picks? Or are we attaching him to someone else?