Sypher04
Registered User
- Jan 20, 2011
- 13,123
- 12,052
Unfortunately with Kerfoot KD signed him as a guy who could get around 40pts at pre-flat cap rates. I am not sure why he jumped on that so hard without a game played unless maybe he didn't like the optics of trading Kadri for two pending FAs but he isn't close to worth $3.5M in todays environment. With a stronger start next season and any cap relief in sight at all it becomes easier but right now he is a negative asset unless the Leafs retain and they might have to pay the Kraken to take him this summer. I think he is better than the 7th forward on a bunch of teams but not at the $3.5 with 2 1/2 years to go. If they retain $1M I think they they may have options without getting their pockets picked but that isn't much cap freed up for a big move. Dubas may be reluctant to make such a move as that would make the Kadri deal look even worse so my guess is Kerf is not going anywhere this season.
As to Hall, he makes any club better but he isn't a goalie or a center or a physical force so how much harder does he make the club to play against without filling a real void?
In the context of today, most players in the NHL aren't worth their contract, because so much of the league was paid based on the understanding of cap growth. Kerfoot was paid right in line with comparable contracts like Kapanen and Johnsson
And Hall would give us another player capable of driving play himself, which is valuable no matter what. This team doesn't have many legitimate needs. Moreso looking at luxuries in most positions in terms of deadline adds. That said, im not really saying we definitely should get Hall, but it's a reasonable conversation