Kurtz
Registered User
- Jul 17, 2005
- 10,550
- 7,828
This "Taylor Hall is not a winner" argument is so...silly, especially as we just went through a similar thing with Kessel.
Yes, if Hall is your best player and expected leader then obviously you're not going to be good enough to win.
But when you already have lots of leadership and all you're asking Hall to do is be your 3rd or 4th best winger, what does his team history matter?
Yes, if Hall is your best player and expected leader then obviously you're not going to be good enough to win.
But when you already have lots of leadership and all you're asking Hall to do is be your 3rd or 4th best winger, what does his team history matter?