showtime8
Registered User
Would you do Dobson and Wahlstrom for Nylander?
I wouldn't. Although it's not far off, I just don't know if Dobson is the guy that I would target.
Would you do Dobson and Wahlstrom for Nylander?
85 assists?
It’s insane how underrated Brodie has become because of a bad couple of weeks, and while he didn’t have a stellar playoff by any means, McCabe didn’t help. That pair simply wasn’t working.
There’s not a lot of guys who have been better than Brodie defensively for the last couple years. With the addition of Klingberg, that’s going to be hard to give up.
If Brad was dead set on adding physicality to our defense, it feels like 2RD was the spot to do it which makes the Klingberg move confusing. He certainly didn’t need to be a July 1 signing. If Dumba doesn’t get the term he wants and opts to sign 1 year, that would have been a much better choice.
Tanev is a better defencemen as well as a better fit are we really discussing this?It’s insane how underrated Brodie has become because of a bad couple of weeks, and while he didn’t have a stellar playoff by any means, McCabe didn’t help. That pair simply wasn’t working.
There’s not a lot of guys who have been better than Brodie defensively for the last couple years. With the addition of Klingberg, that’s going to be hard to give up.
If Brad was dead set on adding physicality to our defense, it feels like 2RD was the spot to do it which makes the Klingberg move confusing. He certainly didn’t need to be a July 1 signing. If Dumba doesn’t get the term he wants and opts to sign 1 year, that would have been a much better choice.
He's been one of (if not the best) Leaf free agent signing in decades. It's amazing how we can all watch the same game yet feel so completely different about the players on this team. Brodie is the least of this teams problems.It’s insane how underrated Brodie has become because of a bad couple of weeks, and while he didn’t have a stellar playoff by any means, McCabe didn’t help. That pair simply wasn’t working.
There’s not a lot of guys who have been better than Brodie defensively for the last couple years. With the addition of Klingberg, that’s going to be hard to give up.
If Brad was dead set on adding physicality to our defense, it feels like 2RD was the spot to do it which makes the Klingberg move confusing. He certainly didn’t need to be a July 1 signing. If Dumba doesn’t get the term he wants and opts to sign 1 year, that would have been a much better choice.
I’m not gonna dispute that cause that list of good free agent signings only has kampf bunting samsonov mikayhev and maybe jarnkrok on it in saying that Brodie has been solid for us but tanev is a better fit with Reilly then everyone else can slot in better spotsHe's been one of (if not the best) Leaf free agent signing in decades. It's amazing how we can all watch the same game yet feel so completely different about the players on this team. Brodie is the least of this teams problems.
We cant to be honest.. a chunk of money needs to move in order to make an impact change..The challenge is needing both a better mix at moving the puck and some physicality.
I agree that Brodie is being undervalued, and also found the Klingberg acquisition confusing.
If we keep Nylander, it’s going to be difficult to really make the type of change needed.
I vaguely remember some speculation/reports about Kuznetsov being part of why they let Samsonov go....the two together were a bad influence on each other or something to that effect and one had to go?Two years at $7.8 million, put up 55 points last year, while putting up terrible defensive metrics.
The 31-year-old Kuznetsov is in the second-to-last season of his current contract that carries a salary cap hit of $7.8 million, according to PuckPedia. He also has a 15-team no-trade clause, so there’s a limited market for his services. Also hurting his trade chances is his struggles on offense; in 2022-23, he managed only 12 goals, his worst full-season total since his NHL rookie year of 2014-15.
Kuznetsov is coming off what general manager Brian MacLellan called a disappointing season, as he struggled to find consistency and ended up with 12 goals, 43 assists and a plus-minus of minus-26 through 81 games, a far cry from a standout 2021-22 campaign that saw him bounce back from on-ice and off-ice issues.
Fair to say, I'd have no interest.
I vaguely remember some speculation/reports about Kuznetsov being part of why they let Samsonov go....the two together were a bad influence on each other or something to that effect and one had to go?
Plus the fact he's decidedly mediocre now - while making almost a million more than Nylander - makes this an easy hard pass.
So why does Calgary do that swap then?Tanev is a better defencemen as well as a better fit are we really discussing this?
Both or neither. They are very much the same player, but Tanev is glass - only once in his career has he played more than 70 games.If you’re the opposing player, who would you rather go up against in front of the net or in the corners, Brodie or Tanev?
yes, our defense still needs an overhaul.That's all well and good, but he's still our best defensive D. We need an upgrade, or at least younger replacement if we do that.
I don’t believe they would to be honest if they do they need a new gmSo why does Calgary do that swap then?
personally, i think Tanev is on a tier higher than Brodie defensively ...and he's Strong. Brodie is mushI'm curious as to what it is you think Tanev brings that this team lacks, that Brodie doesn't do?
Go find the metrics on who the best NHL defensive Dmen were last season. You may just be surprised.Tanev is a better defencemen as well as a better fit are we really discussing this?
I think a healthy Tanev is a better fit than Brodie but its a 1 year move and there are younger and less expensive players that can bridge the Schenn to Brodie gap. I would have definitely done this a few years ago if I suspected Tanev would be this durable but if he repeats 23-24 that doesn't move the needle much, if any.I'm not sure what you mean by toughness exactly... I mean he does battle in front of the net, but he's more of a shot blocking, taking away the angles kind of guy. He's almost had the same number of hits over his career, as Schenn did last year alone... he's not some physical net front force, or a guy who punishes other teams players. I've always like Tanev, but I'd think the team needs physicality as much as anything else.
Risto is legitimately bad. I mean that would be terrible. Brodie for Risto. Ugh. What are we even talking about here?yes, our defense still needs an overhaul.
right now i see it as
Reilly - xxx
xxx - Klingberg
McCabe - Lil
Gio - Timmins (extras)
Brodie out and Nylander out to fill at least one of those 2 spots or both.
I'd target Peeke as one guy that wouldnt cost Nylander to get that could come at a good price with how far down the pecking order he is now with the new additions in Columbus
then Nylander for Hanafin/Pesce or a d-man of that ilk
Brodie for a meaner stay at home type, ala Zadorov ...Brodie may technically be 'better' but, Zadorov would be a better fit (or a like player that is tougher and cheaper than Brodie and plays the stay at home game
I'd even consider Brodie for Ritsolanien ...he has a bad rep, but, he is tough if he can be focused,... but, i'd want some retention on him though.
i think Peeke will be the next Pesce ...i'd take the gamble, and the few times i watched him play, i've been mostly impressedHe would be the logical one. With $7.5M in salary I am not sure if you would get any kind of return and might actually need to pay something. Also I am pretty sure Columbus would be on his list and that list is the other problem.
I would have a bit of a concern Peake was a product of Gavrikov who seems to have been his partner but they were such an awful club defensively and much weaker after the TDL its a hard read. And he has never played behind a strong Jackets lineup so not much history. At -41 he is likely to be at his lowest ever value. I assume that the Leafs would be able to ignore that as the product of his environment unless pro scouting revealed an actual decline in his game.
I was looking at the CBJ stats for last season where they were the second worst defensive club in the league. They must have the kindest official scorers in the league I think. The worst defenseman for giveaways on their team is better than any Leaf D that has played more than 6 games. I don't think that myopia would extend to shot based metrics though.
It would be a bit daring for a GM to move a known quantity for a player like that. Given the cost that might attach to a Brodie move maybe Tre aims for a higher profile guy but that $2.75 AV is pretty attractive.
Metrics schmetrics I watch hoccey and tanev is the better fit with Rielly barring he stays healthy of courseGo find the metrics on who the best NHL defensive Dmen were last season. You may just be surprised.
i think Peeke will be the next Pesce ...i'd take the gamble, and the few times i watched him play, i've been mostly impressed
Metrics schmetrics I watch hoccey and tanev is the better fit with Rielly barring he stays healthy of course
yes, our defense still needs an overhaul.
right now i see it as
Reilly - xxx
xxx - Klingberg
McCabe - Lil
Gio - Timmins (extras)
Brodie out and Nylander out to fill at least one of those 2 spots or both.
Brodie had a rough start to the season, and a very rough end ...and playing next to Holl as often as he did can make anyone look worse than they are.He's been one of (if not the best) Leaf free agent signing in decades. It's amazing how we can all watch the same game yet feel so completely different about the players on this team. Brodie is the least of this teams problems.
Tanev is a better defencemen as well as a better fit are we really discussing this?
Maybe by a hair. They've both been top defensive defensemen for the past few years. Fit is impossible to predict. We know Brodie plays well with Rielly. We think Tanev might.
Like sure, if Calgary wants to swap the two players straight up we'll take the right shot and $500k cap savings, but that's unlikely. I don't think it's a particularly impactful move and not something worth giving up a lot of assets for.
they wouldnt unless its part of a bigger package/dealSo why does Calgary do that swap then?