Maybe it’s not the moves that are Questionable, but the judgement of them. Nobody gets style points for a great looking rebuild that fails to achieve the goals. In all seriousness, you wouldn’t even be talking about Sakic if they hadn’t won the cup.
Five years ago they were so bad, they lucked into Makar, under Sakic.
All this revisionist BS because someone else won and we haven’t (yet), I’m mad and am going to throw my toys around posting. I wonder if we do have success, if these posters will give Kudos to Dubas for any success he might have, or are they hoping that we fail, so that they are proven correct and can win internet points?
It really is weird behaviour.