Fogelhund
Registered User
- Sep 15, 2007
- 24,175
- 29,191
Do we really need a guy who's play has declined the last few years, who needs a Brodie/Giordano to babysit him, until 2029/30 at $6.5 mil?Brodie/Giordano - Parayko???
Do we really need a guy who's play has declined the last few years, who needs a Brodie/Giordano to babysit him, until 2029/30 at $6.5 mil?Brodie/Giordano - Parayko???
He was - he signed in the middle of the 2007/08 season where he finished 2nd in Norris voting.Pretty sure Phaneuf was a Norris finalist when he signed that deal
Sounds familiar.Do we really need a guy who's play has declined the last few years, who needs a Brodie/Giordano to babysit him, until 2029/30 at $6.5 mil?
Lol I don't know how many of these comments I read about Lindholm last year before Boston acquired him.
I'll confess that I haven't watched much of Parayko this year, but I bet he's still perfectly fine.
Damn I love it when somebody offers a new way to say 'he weren't that good'. I'm going to have to try and use it after a round of golf with the boys.Clarke was a total cotton-headed ninny-muggins at the WJC, reminded me of Jake Gardiner. If LA can offload Turcotte at the same time, they’re laughing.
This is so weird. This league is so weird sometimes. Now he might play?
It's starting to sound a whole lot like they were bluffing, to get a team to step up, and meet their price. Nobody did... move on.
""Sounds like they are really close to trading him but yeah... definitely sounds like a team got really close and now they hope someone else offers more or matches or something. But to say he might play after holding out is really weird.
On the mains the rumours was AZ and LA couldn't quite settle on the contracts going back to off-set the money .. so they're revisiting it but AZ is circling back to other suitors.
This is another negative post about a Leafs player.
I don't think anyone is surprised.
6 worst defenseman on the Habs
View attachment 649695
Hedman has never been much of a physical defenseman though. He has the puck a lot so his hits totals are lower, but that doesn't mean he's all that physical either. He's very much someone that defends with his attributes (skill, skating) over being physical along the boards or infront of the net. He's fantastic, so it's not a negative at all either.
Sandin is definitely physical in his own right. He'll crunch people.
To go back to the original point, Parayko is not physical at all. He's just a big guy that moves well and has skill. That's it, that's all.
To me it's being able to clear the front of the net, most our d struggle with that aspect.
To be fair, I stole it from the movie Elf. But it’s definitely a fun line to use.Damn I love it when somebody offers a new way to say 'he weren't that good'. I'm going to have to try and use it after a round of golf with the boys.
As to our boys in blue and white...I'm a bit surprised that Keefe's words after the game haven't sparked more discussion. He basically called them a bunch of cotton-headed ninny-muggins who's efforts as professionals were unacceptable. Yup, I'd agree with that. It's on the players. Far too often they offer less than what is required. I have watched this long enough.
Its not a negative or positive post... just talk about what physical does it mean
And i dont understand why you post habs stats...
Depend what is your definition or physical for sure,
Sandin against maroon/ perry line, what do you think it will happen.... whatever how hard he will try, he will be dominated in term of physicality against that kind of line... Sandin playing with a lot of grit yes but he cant be physical because of his lack of strenght... so for me sandin is a gritty player but not a physical one
Exact clearly the front and the net and winning 1v1 battle around the board
Massive price and risky contract for a guy who doesn't fill a need for us.
I'm more interested in a guy like Jake McCabe. More reasonable acquisition cost, defensively sound, can play top shut down minutes against good players + PK, and is reasonably physical.
So size is the only thing that matters? Sandin has never had an issue handling much bigger players and while he's not a big guy, there's like 5% of the league that can handle someone like Maroon physically, pound for pound.
Leech actually played defense and back then I think we used 2 Dmen on the PP instead of one.No issue with Mccabe or seeking to fill an exact need...but Karlsson would take over as our pp QB and you can always use an elite puckmover in the playoffs. You can fill weaknesses, but another way to improve is to build on strengths.
It reminds me of that 2003 season where we added Brian Leech despite already having several offensive dmen (Kaberle, Jackman, Mccabe) and he was unbelievable and instantly became our best dman.
If we're looking at taking a home run swing...why not get both Mccabe and Karlsson? With retention on both we can fit them both in. The pair would cost us Sandin and probably 3 firsts, but would give us a legit first pairing tandem for the next 3 seasons. And then you can probably flip Holl for a solid bottom 6 forward.
Friedman reiterated this morning on the 32 Thoughts podcast that there are work visa/COVID related non-vaccination issues with Bertuzzi and crossing the boarder that is causing Canadian teams to be cautious about him.
Didn't know about the work visa/COVID thing but sounds like he is the anti Bergkamp. Dennis Bergkamp is a football legend at Arsenal and Holland and beside his goals, he is most famous for fear of flying. He would miss away games due to traveling schedule. Bertuzzi will miss home games but won't miss any American Away games, lol.Friedman reiterated this morning on the 32 Thoughts podcast that there are work visa/COVID related non-vaccination issues with Bertuzzi and crossing the boarder that is causing Canadian teams to be cautious about him.
Leech actually played defense and back then I think we used 2 Dmen on the PP instead of one.