Thank you RB. That's pretty cut and dry. I'm happy he addressed it and I'm happy with vigneault being the spokesman, I like how he speaks and what he tells you, he's respectful with people, but he also tells it how it is, cut and dry.
Yeah it's on both players now. In terms of G and the rangers, they both would be stupid to part ways, neither side will be happy with the outcome. A) you can't replace him in the short-term which completely throws away the whole season for the rest of the team. B) I wouldn't want trade Girardi for Niskanen in the line-up long term, or whoever you bring in. I don't like that trade off, I don't know how you effectively replace what Girardi is or does.
With Callahan, I have a hard time talking just straight practically about him, him and G, and then staal and dubi, they represented to me everything the rangers weren't for so many of my teenage years. Jags was Jags, Straka, Nylander, Rucinsky, Rosy, Shanahan, these guys played well, but those 4 kids and hank, that changed the tides of the rangers organization. So much of what has come since then, is a product of the culture and atmosphere that became the rangers. So, Im biased. But if Callahan wants to stay, he is going to have to decide that getting the top dollar he can or winning in negotiations, or getting his credit and due where maybe he felt he hasn't truly from the godfather Sather, isn't what deep down drives him.
If he has an eye on a certain location or he truly isn't englamored with the rangers way of doing things. Then by all means, but if he wants to stay, he gonna make some concessions.