2008-09: 81 games played
2009-10: 77 games played
2010-11: 60 games played
2011-12: 76 games played
2012-13: 45(of 48) games played
2013-14: 39 (of 56) games played
4 out of 6 seasons, he missed no significant time. And I know the team is playing well now with the current lineup combinations, but I've been a fan of this team long enough to know that lines and units don't stay together forever. When things start to get stale, that will be the true test of how much this team needs or doesn't need Callahan.
Is it any more difficult than proclaiming that a player's best days are behind him based on 3 months with a number of mitigating circumstances at play?
Something tells me a lot of people on this board are going to be doing a lot of grumbling when Callahan, playing for another team, puts up another 3-4 50/60 point seasons in this league, while continuing to be one of the most effective away from the puck players in the league.
What's great about this forum isn't that people are having difficult admitting that Callahan's best days are behind him (a dubious theory at best), but how quickly he is being trashed and derided simply because he wants to get paid. He watched loser bums that he carried get paid for years; why shouldn't he want to get paid? He earned it. These same fans trashing him didn't have a problem when he was playing his ass off and being one of the biggest reasons this team had any success of late, while earning money that, in relative terms, was nothing special.
You have no idea what direction they are heading in, because you have no idea what that money will be spent on instead.
Three things bother me about this post.
First--You get agitated about the notion that people think Callahan is injury prone. Other people do as well. They cry out, "no no, he only missed time in two seasons!" Watch what happens when those same people react to concerns about Cally's production rate, particularly in the playoffs. THEN the narrative becomes "He was playing hurt! He HAD to be!" You get to have it one way or the other. Either he's injury prone and that hurts his performance (even when he does play through it), or he isn't and there are serious questions about his production (particularly in the postseason). It's dishonest to discount injury in one post and cite injury in another.
Second--It isn't three months of lowering production, it's three years. Callahan's production rate peaked in the 2010-11 season. He signed his current contract with the big raise right after that season. His production rate has decreased each season since signing that contract. While I do think it is too early to make claims that a player's best years are behind him in his late 20s (though that is exactly what you did during Dubinsky's ONE down year), he's on a three year downward trend.
Third--You are putting love for a player over the best interests of the team. I get that, I do. It makes total sense with a player like Callahan. He will ALWAYS be more than he is as a player in our arena than he would be in someone else's. I'm all for keeping him, even though I think we would be a better team with what we could get for him in trade. That said, it has to be within reason.
He was paid based on a higher salary cap than what we have now, after a season that marked his career best production rate. He failed to live up to that cap number. There is no way that it makes sense to give him a 50% increase over the long term for that failure.
Looking at it logically, the only solution is to trade him for a big return.
Looking at it with my heart on my sleeve, I'd be comfortable with the team giving him his 6 million on a VERY short term contract (2 years) or giving him his current salary on a longer term (5 years). Both of those contracts would be generous based on his actual production.
All that being said, however, it is his right entirely to get more if he wants (and can get) more. If 4+x5 or 6x2 aren't enough, then he has every right to move on and get paid. It doesn't make him a bad person, and it doesn't denigrate what he's done for this franchise. I just don't want to see him become a hated figure like Messier became in his second tenure here. And if he's making 6+ over a long term contract, his play will
never come close to justifying that. The hate will be inevitable with those numbers.