Rumor: Trade Thread XVI: Callahan looking for $6.85M+ AAV?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BarbaraAlphanse
  • Start date Start date
  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Nash, Kreider, Zucc and Stepan are better than Callahan in my opinion, and Kreider and Zucc have been playing at their current level for a about half of a season while Callahan has been at his level for years. To me, Richards is playing better right now but he is not a better player overall. He's entirely one dimensional and he's on and off in that one dimension. Brassard is the same deal, and he's hot right now as well. Hagelin isn't even arguable in my opinion. Callahan has just as many points this year, is a better power play player and a better defensive player.

6 is more than he deserves in absolutely ideal circumstances, but I could live with it for 5 years. 7 years is crazy. Callahan wants the team to meet him at dollars and years, both of which are too high. That's not going to happen.

If you wanted a top player from another team and the GM told you it was going to take Kreider or Cally, you pick...who do you send packing?
 
2008-09: 81 games played
2009-10: 77 games played
2010-11: 60 games played
2011-12: 76 games played
2012-13: 45(of 48) games played
2013-14: 39 (of 56) games played

4 out of 6 seasons, he missed no significant time. And I know the team is playing well now with the current lineup combinations, but I've been a fan of this team long enough to know that lines and units don't stay together forever. When things start to get stale, that will be the true test of how much this team needs or doesn't need Callahan.



Is it any more difficult than proclaiming that a player's best days are behind him based on 3 months with a number of mitigating circumstances at play?

Something tells me a lot of people on this board are going to be doing a lot of grumbling when Callahan, playing for another team, puts up another 3-4 50/60 point seasons in this league, while continuing to be one of the most effective away from the puck players in the league.

What's great about this forum isn't that people are having difficult admitting that Callahan's best days are behind him (a dubious theory at best), but how quickly he is being trashed and derided simply because he wants to get paid. He watched loser bums that he carried get paid for years; why shouldn't he want to get paid? He earned it. These same fans trashing him didn't have a problem when he was playing his ass off and being one of the biggest reasons this team had any success of late, while earning money that, in relative terms, was nothing special.



You have no idea what direction they are heading in, because you have no idea what that money will be spent on instead.

Three things bother me about this post.

First--You get agitated about the notion that people think Callahan is injury prone. Other people do as well. They cry out, "no no, he only missed time in two seasons!" Watch what happens when those same people react to concerns about Cally's production rate, particularly in the playoffs. THEN the narrative becomes "He was playing hurt! He HAD to be!" You get to have it one way or the other. Either he's injury prone and that hurts his performance (even when he does play through it), or he isn't and there are serious questions about his production (particularly in the postseason). It's dishonest to discount injury in one post and cite injury in another.

Second--It isn't three months of lowering production, it's three years. Callahan's production rate peaked in the 2010-11 season. He signed his current contract with the big raise right after that season. His production rate has decreased each season since signing that contract. While I do think it is too early to make claims that a player's best years are behind him in his late 20s (though that is exactly what you did during Dubinsky's ONE down year), he's on a three year downward trend.

Third--You are putting love for a player over the best interests of the team. I get that, I do. It makes total sense with a player like Callahan. He will ALWAYS be more than he is as a player in our arena than he would be in someone else's. I'm all for keeping him, even though I think we would be a better team with what we could get for him in trade. That said, it has to be within reason.

He was paid based on a higher salary cap than what we have now, after a season that marked his career best production rate. He failed to live up to that cap number. There is no way that it makes sense to give him a 50% increase over the long term for that failure.

Looking at it logically, the only solution is to trade him for a big return.

Looking at it with my heart on my sleeve, I'd be comfortable with the team giving him his 6 million on a VERY short term contract (2 years) or giving him his current salary on a longer term (5 years). Both of those contracts would be generous based on his actual production.

All that being said, however, it is his right entirely to get more if he wants (and can get) more. If 4+x5 or 6x2 aren't enough, then he has every right to move on and get paid. It doesn't make him a bad person, and it doesn't denigrate what he's done for this franchise. I just don't want to see him become a hated figure like Messier became in his second tenure here. And if he's making 6+ over a long term contract, his play will never come close to justifying that. The hate will be inevitable with those numbers.
 
IMO if slats gave someone permission to speak to the agent it's because he's got a deal worked out

For the reasons rangerboy mentioned above

And Hagelin is a much better Defensive player than cally these days

And Richards and brassard are far more important to the team now their powerplay abilities alone. Callahan actually doesn't even play on the PP anymore he lost that job too

I can't imagine a 6 million dollar forward not good enough to play on either of his teams powerplay units. Kinda backs my point. He's prob the the 8th or 9th best forward on team
 
I mean Johansen, Murray, Atkinson, they have pieces, but I'm not sure who specifically

Yeah I think we'd all want Johansen but with his breakout year it'd have to be a massive overpayment and no, before anyone proposes it a signed Cally plus Brassard won't get it done:sarcasm:
 
Kesler for Cally would work for both teams.

Kesler dealing with same durability issues Cally is critiqued for. Production has fallen to Cally levels.

People are over rating Kes and under rating Cally. It's a lateral swap that makes sense for both teams. Cally is reunited with Torts. Kesler allows us to buy out Brad, give us the same production that Cally gives us, with the same heart/intensity and still have a bomb PP shot after Brad leaves.

It's a very fair trade in my opinion.

Only thing is, I think Torts likes Kes and the two of them together would be the exact identity Torts tried to build here. He plays him 25 + minutes a game sometimes. That's absurd for a forward.

Edler makes more sense... from the Canucks at least.

But point is, Kesler for Cally would and should work for both teams if that's an avenue they want to pursue.
 
Kesler for Cally would work for both teams.

Kesler dealing with same durability issues Cally is critiqued for. Production has fallen to Cally levels.

People are over rating Kes and under rating Cally. It's a lateral swap that makes sense for both teams. Cally is reunited with Torts. Kesler allows us to buy out Brad, give us the same production that Cally gives us, with the same heart/intensity and still have a bomb PP shot after Brad leaves.

It's a very fair trade in my opinion.

Only thing is, I think Torts likes Kes and the two of them together would be the exact identity Torts tried to build here. He plays him 25 + minutes a game sometimes. That's absurd for a forward.

Edler makes more sense... from the Canucks at least.

But point is, Kesler for Cally would and should work for both teams if that's an avenue they want to pursue.

Then who plays center for Vancouver?
 
Yeah I think we'd all want Johansen but with his breakout year it'd have to be a massive overpayment and no, before anyone proposes it a signed Cally plus Brassard won't get it done:sarcasm:

Agreed, think if its Columbus, its guys like Foligno, Letestu, Nikitin, possibly Artie? Of course not all of those guys, but think those would be the names mentioned.
 
IMO if slats gave someone permission to speak to the agent it's because he's got a deal worked out

For the reasons rangerboy mentioned above

And Hagelin is a much better Defensive player than cally these days

And Richards and brassard are far more important to the team now their powerplay abilities alone. Callahan actually doesn't even play on the PP anymore he lost that job too

I can't imagine a 6 million dollar forward not good enough to play on either of his teams powerplay units. Kinda backs my point. He's prob the the 8th or 9th best forward on team

Yea... who's on the ice when we have a lead and want to hold it for the final minute?

Cally...

He's not as useless as you make him seem.
 
I think we'd be looking at what Richards brought back from the Kings if he'll sign.

Schenn + Simmonds + 1st/2nd

Young top end prospect, young 3rd liner + pick

The rumors of Stewart and McGinn make sense as the 2nd portion of that package.
 
Unless it's an amazing package stop ****ing trading with Columbus.
 
Oh please. 11-12 was the exception to the rule. That team had a coach that beat the effort into them night after night, and after one successful season, they flopped and then got their coach fired. I love whenever someone questions the battle level of the team, some self proclaimed superfan comes in and starts rattling on about the 11-12 season. A season where we barely beat two inferior teams in 7 game series only to get bounced by another weak team in the ECF. A season where had we not had a hot start, we would have been a bubble team AGAIN.

So the team competed under Renny, but they fired him because they wanted MORE compete level? How does that make any sense. :laugh:

Joke's on you. Get a clue.


Oh please man. Get a clue yourself. The Rangers were playing tough hard hockey dating back back to at least the beginning of 2010-2011. Don't try calling me a super fan and playing me like that. I know Ive watched, I know what Im talking about.

THat is exactly why they fired Renney, I think there are direct quotes stating they wanted a coach who would help bring that out in the entire team more consistently. Callahan, Dubinsky, Staal, Girardi, those 4 guys and Hank were almost solely responsible for the Rangers even being competitive, and the FO decided they needed a coach who would demand it from the rest of the team.

Dont diss me, I never called myself super fan, thats super lame. but Im calling you on your BS. Joke's on me ha


Seriously, can we have some honesty here. That is what those guys were bringing. And the rest of the team needed to match it, so Renney was let go and they brought in torts.


Additionally those two inferior teams A) one of them washington had just beaten the #2 seed boston in 7, and B) the senators, with nearly the same team as the team that lost to the rangers wiped the floor with the #2 seed Canadians last year. Those teams weren't bad teams.

You want to talk about trendy. Its trendy to say the 2011-12 team was bad bc they had difficulty in playoff series (which they end up winning) against teams that were better than anyone gives credit for. You want to say that style is unsustainable, I'd admit the rangers didn't have enough in the tank when it came time to the devil series. I'm honest man, I'm not saying what I'm saying simply bc it sounds good. It's the truth.
 
Last edited:
With JD in town wonder if Columbus was the team that was granted access?

Also...Kesler talk on the trade board. While I like what Stewart brings to the table and I am a firm believer in having a raw physical player that can't play top 6 I do like the idea of Kesler better. I haven't seen it rumored anywhere but only discussed here. Rangers would of course need to add. Steps and Kesler as your top 2 centers is very respectable.

Totally possible. He gets to play with Dubi again... Lights a new fire in him, we get gabs a prospect and a first back :p

I was calling this earlier. I wonder....Hmm
 
Unless it's an amazing package stop ****ing trading with Columbus.

I don't understand what the obsession with Columbus is.

Please no more trades for Blue Jackets. I don't even want any of their good players at this point.
 
I think we'd be looking at what Richards brought back from the Kings if he'll sign.

Schenn + Simmonds + 1st/2nd

Young top end prospect, young 3rd liner + pick

The rumors of Stewart and McGinn make sense as the 2nd portion of that package.

Exactly. I agree with that value.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad