wafflepadsave
Registered User
I'd do cally straight up for the Isles 1st round pick. That should be a top 10 selection.
Yes maybe that pick could be available. We need a center badly!
I'd do cally straight up for the Isles 1st round pick. That should be a top 10 selection.
I give Zucc 4x4.
I don't know of Brassard is in the plans for the future of this team.
He gets flak because he's not really a good hockey player for the Blues. But yeah, inconsistency plays a huge role for that flak too. I wouldn't touch him with a 10 foot pole. Give me one of their top prospects or get Atkinson from the Jackets.
Edit: Wow looked at Atkinson's stats. Yeah, I doubt the Jackets move him for a rental Callahan. Best time would've been to acquire him last offseason.
I'd do cally straight up for the Isles 1st round pick. That should be a top 10 selection.
I give Zucc 4x4.
I don't know of Brassard is in the plans for the future of this team.
Ryan Callahan may have the most intangibles in the league. Look at what the Olympic committee said of him.
One captain pizza maker is enough for my liking![]()
I would love guys like Girgensons, Ristolainen, Armia, McNabb Grigorenko or Pysyk...but that's wishful thinking. They won't give up even one of those guys for Callahan.
Correction...buffalo has either the islanders 2014 or 2015 first round pick. If the 2014 pick is a top 5 pick, the isles will give them their 2015 pick instead...its the islanders decision
It's pretty obvious that Gorton is having more say. The focus on size (McGinn, Stewart rumors) is his IMO. I kinda agree with it. I am curious to see how it plays out.
I don't disagree with Gorton's philosophy, but Chris Stewart isn't the right type of player because of his very inconsistent and streaky play as I reiterated in a previous post.
And do you mean Jamie McGinn?
Sources have told The Post the Rangers have interest in Colorado’s 25-year-old left wing Jamie McGinn, though it is unclear whether this would be connected to a potential Callahan deal or whether it is independent of such.
really? even with potentially McDavid on the table?
I think Brassard should be re-signed to a two year deal with a slight rise over his QO. He has really helped our PP (obviously along with Zucc) and adds skill which is something our lineup lacks - especially with Richards getting bought out.
Yeah you gotta understand anyone other than a McDavid type of player isnt gonna help for another 2-3 years from 2015....We gotta get something done in that time or the next big Tavares contract will be with another team.
Makes sense, but in that regard aren't you better off moving whichever pick doesn't go to Buffalo for a guy (and I'm not suggesting for Cally or to the Rangers) that is likely to be able to step in within the next 2 seasons rather than hoping that a top 5 pick can step up early?
Hmm, that's all a bit OT I guess...
Think they said they same thing about Drury for the Vancouver Olympics.
If we have any cap space available, I think he should be resigned to a way longer contract than 2 years.
Slats is so clueless with these things. Without a plan. Either you believe in a player, or you don't. You save pennies on those damed bridge contracts. 300-500k for a year or two, then he goes around spending it on the Pyatts of the league. Instead he could pay a mill or even a mil and a half more on a 5-6 year deal where you save a ton after the first couple of years.
And the thing is, good hockey players are always moveable. If we lock up Brassard long term we could always move him, especially if we front-load the deal. If we ever want to move him, the longer contract he is on the more valuble he is.
Brass is a bit inconsistent, yes, but he is very talented and he works very hard actually. He helps the PP and he seems to have an easy time to develop chemistry with other players. Who knows if he can take another step like Sharpe, but no matter what he is still valuble. If we are without an elite top 2 line center, Brass helps us compensate with speed and skill deeper in the lineup.
What is there to think twice about?
If we have any cap space available, I think he should be resigned to a way longer contract than 2 years.
Slats is so clueless with these things. Without a plan. Either you believe in a player, or you don't. You save pennies on those damed bridge contracts. 300-500k for a year or two, then he goes around spending it on the Pyatts of the league. Instead he could pay a mill or even a mil and a half more on a 5-6 year deal where you save a ton after the first couple of years.
And the thing is, good hockey players are always moveable. If we lock up Brassard long term we could always move him, especially if we front-load the deal. If we ever want to move him, the longer contract he is on the more valuble he is.
Brass is a bit inconsistent, yes, but he is very talented and he works very hard actually. He helps the PP and he seems to have an easy time to develop chemistry with other players. Who knows if he can take another step like Sharpe, but no matter what he is still valuble. If we are without an elite top 2 line center, Brass helps us compensate with speed and skill deeper in the lineup.
What is there to think twice about?
If the return is Stewart +, I'd rather have a decent pick + personally. Stewart just doesn't bring enough in terms of production to justify his apparent attitude and motivation issues.