Inferno
Registered User
I still think Girardi for Connolly +2nd is a good deal.
I don't...at all.
Dan Girardi is a top pairing defenseman...even going into his UFA year I'd like more than that.
I still think Girardi for Connolly +2nd is a good deal.
I don't...at all.
Dan Girardi is a top pairing defenseman...even going into his UFA year I'd like more than that.
I don't...at all.
Dan Girardi is a top pairing defenseman...even going into his UFA year I'd like more than that.
Yep and these are the kind of moves that are the difference between perrenial contenders and middling teams. Smart drafting, smart trading and smart FA signings. Getting steals in trades or UDFA are almost a necessity to build a team with longevity.
Knowing when to trade players or sign them long term. Smart asset managment.
Connolly is destroying the AHL, and like it or not Girardi being a UFA hurts his value. I think we can change the 2nd to a 1st if he resigns, but it works great for both sides. Fills a need for both.
Cool. So did Newbury. Point is, doesn't matter what you do until you get to the big leagues. For Connolly, that's a step in the right direction, but doesn't mean anything unless he can repeat the success in the NHL.
Much easier said that done.
I would be behind grabbing Yakupov, it just depends on what they are asking for. If they want to add another top-end talent who needs a better opportunity that would be the one to grab IMO.
Okay. And I believe he can. What's your point? Should we just not trade for players that aren't in the NHL?
To me that depends on the circumstances. There's a big difference between a team like Chicago coming off a Cup win, up against the cap knowing they have to trade, or let players walk versus a team like the Rangers facing giving a FA a long-term deal that has considerable risks involved on both sides of the argument, for instance.
There probably aren't many easy decisions when it comes to being a GM, but some certainly lend themselves to be made easier depending on the surrounding conditions.
I agree. But I also think there is an added element of coach's input on personnel. Vigneault has 4.5 years left on his contract. He's going to have a big say in the assets we keep/trade who we sign/trade for.
No, but hyping players up that are in the AHL as much as this board is doing for Connolly is a mistake.
I would like to know his opinion because he should know his system the best and if he thought re-signing both Callahan and Girardi were the best option I would be okay with it. I don't trust Glen Sather.
I agree. But I also think there is an added element of coach's input on personnel. Vigneault has 4.5 years left on his contract. He's going to have a big say in the assets we keep/trade who we sign/trade for.
6th overall in 2010, big, dynamic goal scorer in juniors, translating well to the pro level. I don't see this ultra hype you're talking about. He's a blue chip prospect buried behind Tampa's incredible offensive depth.
Connolly is a great prospect. Probably more ahead than people think. He fills a massive void this organization has.
Pavl Brendl was also a blue chip prospect. Filatov. Kadri.
The list of blue chip prospects that actually equate to something is smaller than the list of blue chip prospects that fail.
Pavl Brendl was also a blue chip prospect. Filatov. Kadri.
The list of blue chip prospects that actually equate to something is smaller than the list of blue chip prospects that fail.
Sounds like you just don't like Connolly.
Actually, I have no idea who he is. I'm just saying a general rule of thumb is to try and temper expectations for prospects. They tend to fail more than they succeed.
Im not really sure what point you're trying to make here to counteract the very good point that the Rangers need to do a better job of targeting younger players that are on their way to breaking out.
In fact, thats the only thing they can do to avoid paying insane prices if these guys establish themselves at the NHL level -- something you consider a prerequisite for even inquiring.
What do you mean temper expectations? Nobody here is saying he'll be a superstar. Nobody has said he'll be a savior. He's a good, young, cost controlled player that happens to be available to take a chance on.