CerebralGenesis
Registered User
- Jul 23, 2009
- 24,429
- 2
Zubrus is on the ice for like 1/4 of the game. People should stop overrating his presence. He does not turn NJ from a 5-13 to a 13-5 team. Zubrus is a good player, but the last 20 games has more to do with bad goaltending and bad shooting than no Dainius Zubrus.
Zubrus is on the ice for like 1/4 of the game. People should stop overrating his presence. He does not turn NJ from a 5-13 to a 13-5 team. Zubrus is a good player, but the last 20 games has more to do with bad goaltending and bad shooting than no Dainius Zubrus.
Well he does bump everyone down a slot so we have more competent lines. I agree he won't be a savior but he does give us the ability to role line that aren't completely terrible.
We don't roll lines that are completely terrible.
I question whether some of you are actually watching the games. The Devils have been outplaying their opponents at even strength the last ten games. They've been handily outshooting their opponents the last ten games. You don't do that with terrible lines.
The reason we've been losing is a combination of bad goaltending and poor shooting luck.
i'll answer that question with a yes. we have, on paper, the worst forward lines in the nhl. while we havent played poorly, we have what 2 gpg the last month? kovy is essentially a non-factor ES bc of our lack of quality forwards. with lotki and zubie we have competent lines, without them we have GARBAGE lines. let me repeat, GARBAGE! have you watched any games but devils games? if you do then you could have something to compare our lines to. if you dont think we have poor forward lines atm get your homer goggles off.We don't roll lines that are completely terrible.
I question whether some of you are actually watching the games. The Devils have been outplaying their opponents at even strength the last ten games. They've been handily outshooting their opponents the last ten games. You don't do that with terrible lines.
The reason we've been losing is a combination of bad goaltending and poor shooting luck.
Zubrus is on the ice for like 1/4 of the game. People should stop overrating his presence. He does not turn NJ from a 5-13 to a 13-5 team. Zubrus is a good player, but the last 20 games has more to do with bad goaltending and bad shooting than no Dainius Zubrus.
i'll answer that question with a yes. we have, on paper, the worst forward lines in the nhl. while we havent played poorly, we have what 2 gpg the last month? kovy is essentially a non-factor ES bc of our lack of quality forwards. with lotki and zubie we have competent lines, without them we have GARBAGE lines. let me repeat, GARBAGE! have you watched any games but devils games? if you do then you could have something to compare our lines to. if you dont think we have poor forward lines atm get your homer goggles off.
That's not a fair thing to say at all. Zurbus' 1/4 of his game allows (when healthy) Ponikarovsky to play his 1/4 game on an easier line, which in turn allows Carter to play 1/4 of his game on an easier line. Plus Zubrus is the big body we need screening the goalie on the PP, because Clarkson isn't very good at it, and Bernier blocks more pucks than the goalie when he screens.
Zubrus' return effectively gives us 3 players. The same thing can be said about Loktionov.
Neither player is going to all of a sudden make everything click, but they both make the game so much easier to be played.
Zubrus' return gives us three players? That makes no sense.
While Ponikarovsky and Carter will benefit from playing on easier lines, it's not as if their performance goes from 0% to 100%. Maybe they go from 70% to 85% (arbitrary numbers, but the point is that going from facing 2nd to 3rd line competition at ES does not change your performance that much).
And Carter has actually played really well in Zubrus' absence.
Zubrus will improve the forward core, but the Devils would have probably gone through a similar malaise with him in the lineup.
I really don't care about what you perceive our team to be "on paper." What really matters is how they've performed, and all things considering, our forwards have performed pretty well. We should be looking for an upgrade, no doubt, however if you think are lines have played terribly you're simply not watching the games and letting your opinion become biased by the result.
If the Devils get average goaltending the past 20 games, I doubt you are crapping on our forwards in the same manner.
Ponikarovsky has been pretty lousy so I feel like we will be getting a whole new player, and yes, CBGB has played well in their stints as 3rd line players, but they are elite when it comes to playing as a 4th line.
We still need another forward.
i and most others have been saying we needed a forward since BEFORE THE SEASON STARTED. and after watching the games its become more clear that we need one. are you delusional? we cant score more than 2 goals. kovy, the best winger in the nhl, cant do anything ES because of our lack of forwards. and some of the "good" forwards we have havent played like they should (zajac). on paper and on the ice the forward are crap. im really done arguing bc there truly isnt an argument to be made here. not to be a **** but its pretty much fact that our forward arent cutting it
We don't roll lines that are completely terrible.
I question whether some of you are actually watching the games. The Devils have been outplaying their opponents at even strength the last ten games. They've been handily outshooting their opponents the last ten games. You don't do that with terrible lines.
The reason we've been losing is a combination of bad goaltending and poor shooting luck.
When you have Poni as a 1st line LW, Zajac on our 3rd with Bernier and Carter and a 4th line that has Gionta with two AHL'ers/ECHL'ers... I have no idea how you can say, whitout joking, that we have solid lines.
We had some issues regarding our forward depth since training camp and nothing was done to correct that. Add to the problem that Zubrus went down with a injury and our forward core looks absolutely terrible ATM.
We lost a big piece in Parise and replaced him with Loktionov and Kostopoulos. I'm not couting Poni since he was with us most of last year. If you're going to tell me that a team who was already struggling to rack up #'s on the scoreboard, won't feel the impact of losing someone like Parise when being replaced by two question marks, then I don't know what to tell everyone.
Lou brought in Kovalchuk to balance out our secondary scoring and relieve some pressure off of Parise. Well now that Parise chose to continue his career elsewhere, we're back to square one and the alies Parise had when he was our go-to-guy are getting older, meaning that Kovy has to work twice as hard to compensate for a aging core and a lack of talent... thus the reason why he's playing over 25 ****ing minutes a game.
The Devils have issues to remedy at forward, no doubt. I don't disagree.
A lot of you are unduly obsessed with what we have "on paper." Carter and Bernier have played like legitimate NHL third liners this year. Time to update your perception of them.