Joeyjoejoe
Registered User
- Dec 18, 2015
- 6,598
- 9,670
I am getting a feeling that we sign the Cat during this break.
I am feeling a $8.2M for 8 years type contract.
I am feeling a $8.2M for 8 years type contract.
He's 35. I'm not 100% against but it is risky.giving talbot multi year deal is smart to drive down his cap hit
Yes indeed. Pinto does not look like a 2nd line C at this point. He appears a bit slow, & lacks the high end puck-handling skills; however, he seems to have a great shot that he gets off fast on one timers.Lol, if I had the answers to that maybe I'd be coach instead of DJ...
Getting Norris back I think will help goals in general because it will get Pinto slotted back where he belongs
Same, but I think he signs a 5 year extension. That would give him 6 more seasons in Ottawa and allow him to become a UFA at age 31, still time for one more big contract.I am getting a feeling that we sign the Cat during this break.
I am feeling a $8.2M for 8 years type contract.
The year Pinto was injured probably knocked off one year because he only played 5 games versus 10. So, he's a 10.2.c and believe he has a one year slide. I think an ELC needs 3 years & 80 games to move to a RFA contract.Thomas and Kyrou? They didn't have a similar contract status to Pinto when they signed those deals. They were eligible for offer sheets. Pinto will not be eligible for offer sheets this summer because he hasn't accrued enough professional seasons. That gives the Senators far more leverage in negotiations.
Assen na yo!
Signing a 5 year deal, gives him 5 more years, not 6.Same, but I think he signs a 5 year extension. That would give him 6 more seasons in Ottawa and allow him to become a UFA at age 31, still time for one more big contract.
Would be a nice player to get for sure. And, we could probably work his contract in if we were to get rid of Zaitsev.Ekholm is apparently available according to Servelli
![]()
Nashville Predators' Mattias Ekholm "Available"
There is a brand new name to throw out onto the 2023 trade deadline hot stove, and it's a big …www.prohockeyrumors.com
Would be an amazing partner for Sanderson.
He is listed as left shot. Can he play RD? Has he?Would be a nice player to get for sure. And, we could probably work his contract in if we were to get rid of Zaitsev.
But, the cost in terms of assets to get Ekholm plus get rid of Zaitsev would have to be very high. It would be a big, bold move for sure.
Even hearing rumours about Dorion trying to land a defender and get rid of Zaitsev creates some anxiety I suppose.
Ekholm is apparently available according to Servelli
![]()
Nashville Predators' Mattias Ekholm "Available"
There is a brand new name to throw out onto the 2023 trade deadline hot stove, and it's a big …www.prohockeyrumors.com
Would be an amazing partner for Sanderson.
He is listed as left shot. Can he play RD? Has he?
So is Gavrikov (a LD).. I didn't mention it. Just trying to be more light & positive. Maybe it's a New Year's resolution.He is listed as left shot. Can he play RD? Has he?
The year Pinto was injured probably knocked off one year because he only played 5 games versus 10. So, he's a 10.2.c and believe he has a one year slide. I think an ELC needs 3 years & 80 games to move to a RFA contract.
Has anybody found a website that lists 10.2.c contracts?
Actually, I was looking for the salary info for 10.2.c contracts. I know it's not what I typed. My bad.No, it was the first year of his contract, in which he showed up after the NCAA season ended, that doesn't count as a year of professional experience.
Sanderson will be in the same position when his entry deal ends.
CapFriendly lists 10.2.c contracts.
Assen na yo!
As an update, I noticed that Pred fans on main board were saying that they tried Ekholm on the right side for a bit early this year, but switched him back to LD. I guess it didn't work out well. Seemed like there was different theories on why, but he's played as LD basically throughout his career. Don't shoot the messenger - just relaying info.So is Gavrikov (a LD).. I didn't mention it. Just trying to be more light & positive. Maybe it's a New Year's resolution.
To answer your question though, & FWIW, I see Ekholm listed as a LD on most websites. I think I saw him listed on the right side once though.
It was the cost to land a player like that is what I thought of. That's a pretty obvious thought though of course.
Yikes on Faulk defensively but looms awesome offensively. Might be nice to have another offensively gifted D. But contract is AWFUL (6.5M for another 4.5 seasoned). Blues would have to retain.Ekholm would be terrific.
He's played RD in the past.
If I am yall, I'd keep a close eye on Justin Faulk and Dante Fabbro.
I want Fabbro just so I can say "That's Fab Bro"
My bad, I forgot he’s an RFA after this season.Signing a 5 year deal, gives him 5 more years, not 6.
I want Fabbro just so I can say "That's Fab Bro"
Try and get him on a two year $5.5 million dollar deal.I think you are assuming that he will take less per year if he signs for a longer term; however, at his age, there is no certainty that he can continue to play well for a longer period. It might not be "smart" to give him a term longer than a year or two, or three.
Ekholm would be terrific.
He's played RD in the past.
If I am yall, I'd keep a close eye on Justin Faulk and Dante Fabbro.