Big Muddy
Registered User
- Dec 15, 2019
- 9,083
- 4,387
I'm not going to go back & forth on this. Most people are talking about SJS retaining so a different context than $11.5 m. I have already mentioned that the Sharks like most teams would seek more than just cap/$ savings. You have a different view & that's fine.Again the situations are quite different. DeBrincat was 24 with several prime years ahead of him. Karlsson was 28 with one year of a good contract.
Do you consider Karlsson a "good" trading chip with 4 more years of 11.5aav ? That's your phrase - "good" trading chip
Piss off with damage control technique. You initially responded to my post about Karlsson really having no value. If you want to debate that, fine. He's got 11.5 AAV for 4 more years. Feel free to articulate your thoughts on possible returns for him. But don't equate our initially moving him 4 years ago or Chicago moving DeBrincat because neither of those situations is at all similar to the situation SJ is in with Karlsson's contract
Last edited: