Toggle sidebar

Proposal: Trade Rumours/Proposals PART XXXXX

Status
Not open for further replies.
Burrowsaurus said:
Agreed with this. I lean more towards peeke than I do towards parayko. There’s lots of guys playing smaller roles ready to flourish somewhere else and by flourish I mean play steady reliable hockey
Click to expand...
A guy playing a smaller role ready to flourish here is Brannstrom
 
Its crazy how no one is ever satisfied with brannstrom.

The kid took another step this year. What people dont realize is defense comes first then you build your offense from it.
This yr brannstrom rlly solidified his defense which he struggled with in years prior i wouldn't be surprised for hs offense to start coming over thr next year or so
 
  • Like
Reactions: bicboi64, OD99, L'Aveuglette and 1 other person
Hell no to Parayko considering play style, age, and rumoured back issues. For the short term reward, it could also derail the whole thing and be stuck with 7 more years after this one of an albatross contract worse than Phaneuf/Zaitsev.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Que
I just think Parayko is the type of d-man that both Chabot and Sanderson need

Zub and Parayko are great compliments to these guys
 
It's the final 3 years of the Parayko contract that are a no go imo. St louis would have to eat them and then the price would go up and on and on we go.

Otherwise, perfect fit imo.
 
Parayko would have been the PERFECT partner for Chabot, the guy he has desperatly needed for so long. But the problem is he might be declined already, it's hard to tell with injuries but sometimes it's impossible to get back at your previous level, it makes you "age" faster. Some pretty extensive due diligence has to be done here.

The problem for us is that Pierre Dorion and his friends seem to only have access to video tapes from 2-3 years ago... It's probably why we ended up giving up a 2nd round pick for a cap dump or get back Boedker instead of picks for Hoffman

Buckle up...

Adele Dazeem said:
Probably Sanderson
Click to expand...

Parayko from 3-4 years ago? Absolutely

Today, absolute no. There are not many players we should trade Sanderson for. Only guys who are also considered untouchable by their teams as well
 
  • Like
Reactions: Icelevel and DrEasy
SpezDispenser said:
It's the final 3 years of the Parayko contract that are a no go imo. St louis would have to eat them and then the price would go up and on and on we go.

Otherwise, perfect fit imo.
Click to expand...
Why though? You can dump guys, for a price. You can buy out the last 2 years for a pretty moderate cap hit. He could LTIRetire. There's so many options to mitigate the last 2-3 years of his deal. In the meantime, you get 4 years of exactly what you need in the lineup and the asking price is totally doable. I'd be all over this if it was true.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PM, PlayItAgain and Dionysus
BankStreetParade said:
Why though? You can dump guys, for a price. You can buy out the last 2 years for a pretty moderate cap hit. He could LTIRetire. There's so many options to mitigate the last 2-3 years of his deal. In the meantime, you get 4 years of exactly what you need in the lineup and the asking price is totally doable. I'd be all over this if it was true.
Click to expand...
Because it leads to problems down the road. Especially with a ntc.

You will likely have to absolve yourself of this contract halfway through, or maybe you can't a la Zaitsev.

The cap hit is doable though, I agree. The term is balls though.

If nothing else, the fact that he's signed well past 35 should factor in big time into the price - again, imo.
 
There’s like… Three D men I’d trade Sanderson for and now I’m thinking of those three;

Dahlin, McAvoy, Fox and in that order.

That’s it. Maybe Nemec in two years.

Jake Sanderson is special.
 
and why are you talking about Sanderson?
Que said:
There’s like… Three D men I’d trade Sanderson for and now I’m thinking of those three;

Dahlin, McAvoy, Fox and in that order.

That’s it. Maybe Nemec in two years.

Jake Sanderson is special.
Click to expand...
 
Que said:
There’s like… Three D men I’d trade Sanderson for and now I’m thinking of those three;

Dahlin, McAvoy, Fox and in that order.

That’s it. Maybe Nemec in two years.

Jake Sanderson is special.
Click to expand...
Not Makar?
 
guyzeur said:
Could a team offer sheet Pinto in the off season?
Click to expand...
No. He's a 10.2c player which means he can't receive an offer sheet. No arbitration rights either.

The Sens can - and should - grind him into dust during their negotiations this summer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: stempniaksen
SensFan1010 said:
Its crazy how no one is ever satisfied with brannstrom.

The kid took another step this year. What people dont realize is defense comes first then you build your offense from it.
This yr brannstrom rlly solidified his defense which he struggled with in years prior i wouldn't be surprised for hs offense to start coming over thr next year or so
Click to expand...
Sure, I just don't think he is a top 4 D. Just my opinion, I will be happy to be proven wrong later on.
 
Re: Parayko/Weegar - Its kind of academic if they don't waive their NTCs. Then there's the cap issues trying to fit their salaries in unless we dump someone (example Debrincat).
 
guyzeur said:
He must be injury prone now ;)
Click to expand...

That 2nd concussion should have the league worried. Minimal contact but instantly you saw Cale in pain and walked down the tunnel immediately. Love the kid, but he’s not too far removed from the cup run where he obviously had another and has had a few before in his career.

I have said Sanderson reminds me of Lidstrom on multiple occasions. I wouldn’t gamble that away on a player with legitimate concerns. Heck, even McAvoy has his risks.
 
Big Muddy said:
Re: Parayko/Weegar - Its kind of academic if they don't waive their NTCs. Then there's the cap issues trying to fit their salaries in unless we dump someone (example Debrincat).
Click to expand...
Weeger doesn’t have an NTC until July.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom