Proposal: Trade Rumours/Proposals PART XXXXII

Status
Not open for further replies.

Micklebot

Moderator
Apr 27, 2010
57,126
34,871
Putting this thread on Pause for today, carry on in the free agency GDT, I'll open this back up tomorrow or maybe we can start a fresh thread for a fresh new season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cosmix and Loach

UglyPuckling

Registered User
May 14, 2021
1,488
787
2023-24 AAVs

I'm just talking a look at the roster AAV numbers versus trying to predict exactly who will be on the team. The goal is to see where we stand relative to the salary cap next year. By creating a spreadsheet, the "what if" scenarios (if we add player "X", what are the cap implications) can be calculated very quickly (less than 30 seconds).

NOTES:
  1. Zaitsev subtracted and NOT included. Veteran defenders have been replaced with low cost ELCs (Thomson & JBD).
  2. Hamonic & Holden subtracted and NOT included. Generally, all contracts that will expire this year have NOT been included.
  3. Talbot is not included and has been replaced by Sogaard. Defenders (item #2) & goaltender replacements were done to keep the total salaries low in order to meet cap.
  4. Debrincat salary has been included = Qualifying offer
  5. Pinto & Formenton (or a replacement) salaries were included at $2 m. That was a guess and could be low.
  6. This is a 22 player roster.
  7. Performance bonuses are not included.
TOTAL $81.7 m

Tkachuk 8.205
Norris 7.950
Batherson 4.975
Total Line 1: $21.13 m

Debrincat 9.0 (qualifying offer)
Stutzle 8.35
Giroux 6.5
Total Line 2: $23.85 m

Joesph 2.95
Pinto 2.0 (resigned)
Formenton or XXX 2.0
Total Line 3: $6.95 m

Kelly .763
Gambrell/replacement .950
Motte 1.35
Total Line 4 $3.063 m

Chabot 8.0
Zub 4.5 (new contract)
1st pair total $12.5 m

Sanderson .925
JBD .925
2nd pair total $1.850

Thomson .863
Brannstrom 1.2 (resigned to short term contract)
3rd pair total: $2.063 m

Forsberg 2.75
Sogaard .925
Goalie total: $3.675 m

Murray retained 1.562
Buyout:
B Ryan 1.833
C. White .875
MDZ .750
Total retained/buyouts $5.02 m

Forward #13 .800
Defender #7 .800

TOTAL $81.7 M
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wondercarrot

GCK

Registered User
Oct 15, 2018
16,657
10,869
2023-24 Salaries

I'm just talking a look at the roster AAV numbers versus trying to predict exactly who will be on the team. The goal is to see where we stand relative to the salary cap next year. By creating a spreadsheet, the "what if" scenarios (if we add player "X", what are the cap implications) can be calculated very quickly (less than 30 seconds).

NOTES:
  1. Zaitsev subtracted and NOT included. Veteran defenders have been replaced with low cost ELCs (Thomson & JBD).
  2. Hamonic & Holden subtracted and NOT included. Generally, all contracts that will expire this year have NOT been included.
  3. Talbot is not included and has been replaced by Sogaard. Defenders (item #2) & goaltender replacements were done to keep the total salaries low in order to meet cap.
  4. Debrincat salary has been included = Qualifying offer
  5. Pinto & Formenton (or a replacement) salaries were included at $2 m. That was a guess and could be low.
  6. This is a 22 player roster.
  7. Performance bonuses are not included.
TOTAL $81.7 m

Tkachuk 8.205
Norris 7.950
Batherson 4.975
Total Line 1: $21.13 m

Debrincat 9.0 (qualifying offer)
Stutzle 8.35
Giroux 6.5
Total Line 2: $23.85 m

Joesph 2.95
Pinto 2.0 (resigned)
Formenton or XXX 2.0
Total Line 3: $6.95 m

Kelly .763
Gambrell/replacement .950
Motte 1.35
Total Line 4 $3.063 m

Chabot 8.0
Zub 4.5 (new contract)
1st pair total $12.5 m

Sanderson .925
JBD .925
2nd pair total $1.850

Thomson .863
Brannstrom 1.2 (resigned to short term contract)
3rd pair total: $2.063 m

Forsberg 2.75
Sogaard .925
Goalie total: $3.675 m

Murray retained 1.562
Buyout:
B Ryan 1.833
C. White .875
MDZ .750
Total retained/buyouts $5.02 m

Forward #13 .800
Defender #7 .800

TOTAL $81.7 M
1. There is zero chance Greig on his ELC isn’t in that lineup.

2. Debrincat isn’t going to make 9M in Ottawa. If he doesn’t sign Long-term he is gone.
 

UglyPuckling

Registered User
May 14, 2021
1,488
787
1. There is zero chance Greig on his ELC isn’t in that lineup.

2. Debrincat isn’t going to make 9M in Ottawa. If he doesn’t sign Long-term he is gone.
1. I am not trying to predict the exact lineup. This was stated in the 1st sentence. I am only trying to get a feel and decent estimate of the AAV numbers for the next (2023-24) season as a foundation for discussion. As an example though, IF you were to replace the Gambrell/replacement (950k) with Grieg's salary of $863 k, the difference would be $87 k i.e., a very small difference.

2. We can debate what the team will decide to offer to a specific player all day long. Once again, this was not my intent. See point #1 above. For example, if we sign Debrincat at $8.5 m to a long term contract then you just need to subtract 500k from the total. That's the value of the spreadsheet and this exercise. Another example would be the idea of adding Chychrun and his $4.6 m AAV. It's now very simple to see what the impact would be on our cap. This could (should) be useful to frame discussions on roster and salaries/AAVs next year.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Wondercarrot

GCK

Registered User
Oct 15, 2018
16,657
10,869
1. I am not trying to predict the exact lineup. This was stated in the 1st sentence. I am only trying to get a feel and decent estimate of the AAV numbers for the next (2023-24) season as a foundation for discussion. As an example though, IF you were to replace the Gambrell/replacement (950k) with Grieg's salary of $863 k, the difference would be $87 k i.e., a very small difference.

2. We can debate what the team will decide to offer to a specific player all day long. Once again, this was not my intent. See point #1 above. For example, if we sign Debrincat at $8.5 m to a long term contract then you just need to subtract 500k from the total. That's the value of the spreadsheet and this exercise. Another example would be the idea of adding Chychrun and his $4.6 m AAV. Its now very simple to see what the impact would be on our cap.
Greig will be top 9 so pick one of your top 9 above and replace them with Greig. It can be Formenton or Joesph or Debrincat.
 

UglyPuckling

Registered User
May 14, 2021
1,488
787
Greig will be top 9 so pick one of your top 9 above and replace them with Greig. It can be Formenton or Joesph or Debrincat.
So, IF you were to replace Formenton with Grieg, the difference in salary would be $1.137 m, and the total 2023-24 AAV would be $80.6 m. These what if scenarios are quick & easy to do using the underlying spreadsheet that was developed.

Once again, I am not trying to predict the exact lineup, but get a feel for the numbers next season. If anything, I am trying to keep the Senators HF crowd in mind and keep the most important and/or popular players on the roster i.e., Debrincat.
 

aragorn

Do The Right Thing
Aug 8, 2004
29,286
9,994
They have some guys they need to move on from IMO in Brannstrom, Zaitsev, Gambrell, Watson, Hawryluk & Holden. Of the bunch I think Watson & Holden can still play a roll but it would be better if we could improve those positions especially from within. Kastelic needs to be on this team sooner than later.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cosmix

UglyPuckling

Registered User
May 14, 2021
1,488
787
There ya go guys.

Chychrun not close and Zona wants Pinto which Sens have no interest in moving
Ya, heard that too in the intermission. Seems like this was both anticipated and discussed in here.

If the respective GMs have had the opportunity to discuss this all summer, and the deal hasn't happened, there's likely a reason for that. As they say, things happen for a reason.
 
Last edited:

Que

What?
Feb 12, 2017
2,237
1,214
Mind Prison
Classic play by Armstrong. Ask for an untouchable asset and “compromise” by allowing the other party to think they won by selecting the ‘lesser’ asset you had your eye on the whole time.

Armstrong wants Kleven.

Fudgesickles.
 

aragorn

Do The Right Thing
Aug 8, 2004
29,286
9,994
There are a few assets I would give up in a trade like Brannstrom, Jarventie, Thomson, Crookshank, Kelly, Gambrell, Lodin, Daoust & a few others. There are also a number of them that I would not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cosmix

Snowwy

Registered User
Jan 29, 2006
210
169
Classic play by Armstrong. Ask for an untouchable asset and “compromise” by allowing the other party to think they won by selecting the ‘lesser’ asset you had your eye on the whole time.

Armstrong wants Kleven.

Fudgesickles.
Obviously if Armstrong would take Kleven as a centerpiece or whatever, the trade would have been made. Kleven is a dime a dozen prospect.
 

Laphroaig

Registered User
Aug 26, 2011
3,795
1,941
The Town Fun Forgot
They have some guys they need to move on from IMO in Brannstrom, Zaitsev, Gambrell, Watson, Hawryluk & Holden. Of the bunch I think Watson & Holden can still play a roll but it would be better if we could improve those positions especially from within. Kastelic needs to be on this team sooner than later.
I don't understand your desire to move on from Hawryluk. The guy is on a two way contract. There is no downside to having him in the organization. At worst he makes Belleville a better team. At best he provides excellent injury insurance for the Sens. I like the way he plays.
 

Ice-Tray

Registered User
Jan 31, 2006
16,623
8,537
Victoria
Thing is, he has a history of injury, is currently injured, is a LD that had a down year playing in the right side last year. He also puts pressure on the cap for all the above.

This is not a situation where we trade assets that we want to keep, especially not Pinto, and I wouldn’t trade Kleven for him either.

He just isn’t a guy that fills a hole that we need.
 

HSF

Registered User
Sep 3, 2008
26,540
7,972
putting pressure on the cap should not be a reason to not go after Chychrun

cap is not an issue right now
 

aragorn

Do The Right Thing
Aug 8, 2004
29,286
9,994
Scott Mayfield RD is a guy this team could use on the backend, he would likely be cheaper than Chychrun.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bicboi64

Big Muddy

Registered User
Dec 15, 2019
9,082
4,387
Obviously if Armstrong would take Kleven as a centerpiece or whatever, the trade would have been made. Kleven is a dime a dozen prospect.
Yes, I doubt if Kleven is the sticking point or the reason why the trade between the Yotes/Senators hasn't happened. Kleven might be one of the pieces in a trade, but not the main one.

Also, the cap is not an issue now, but it could be next year. A lot depends on how much the cap might rise. Most contracts have multi-year terms, so a GM needs to look beyond the current year and understand the downstream implications of a trade and its impact on cap. As far as next years cap is concerned, I will guess it will be closer to $85 million than $90 million even with what Daly has recently said.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Snowwy
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad