- Apr 2, 2008
- 26,833
- 15,479
its possible (depending on who we add) but I suspect we carry an extra due to injuries and depending on how Sanderson looks early. i think adding a RD just means that Zaitzev is goneI think Dorion prioritizing a top 4 RD while having Sanderson coming in and Holden/Hamonic on the 3rd pair leads me to believe that Brannstrom won't be here for training camp. I don't think he's in their plans at all.
Ugh. I’m so attached to chycrun. I’m gonna be dissapointed about weegar and that’s on me.
I think the issue is we are asking Brannstrom to come in a carry a pairing. That shouldn't be asked of Brannstrom nor Sanderson this year. They need to bring a legit top 4 defensemen who is steady in the NHL to play with Chabot and Branny. Zub can cover one of those spots but the top spot with Chabot will really stabilize and let the other guys fall into spaceI respect you are a Branny fan. But I want a better player on the 2nd pair than what we have seen from Brannstrom in the NHL.
I can see him rotating in and getting some games on that pair but I don't see that as a season long solution for a team wanting to be in the playoffs.
LD is probably a tough thing for the sens to get pastUgh. I’m so attached to chycrun. I’m gonna be dissapointed about weegar and that’s on me.
Seems like a party guy too and he’s almost thirty. How much is left there.
I know but it’s a top pairing guy. And a physical monster.I think the issue is we are asking Brannstrom to come in a carry a pairing. That shouldn't be asked of Brannstrom nor Sanderson this year. They need to bring a legit top 4 defensemen who is steady in the NHL to play with Chabot and Branny. Zub can cover one of those spots but the top spot with Chabot will really stabilize and let the other guys fall into space
Add someone like Weegar and now other guys can fall into a better spot such as brannstrom and zub
LD is probably a tough thing for the sens to get past
Oh yah I get what you are saying. I just want someone better, He could be played there but Its not a long term solution. I think Sanderson will be the better player by mid season and will get better as the season goes onI think the issue is we are asking Brannstrom to come in a carry a pairing. That shouldn't be asked of Brannstrom nor Sanderson this year. They need to bring a legit top 4 defensemen who is steady in the NHL to play with Chabot and Branny. Zub can cover one of those spots but the top spot with Chabot will really stabilize and let the other guys fall into space
Add someone like Weegar and now other guys can fall into a better spot such as brannstrom and zub
definitely possible. I rather keep both and let them play it out so we have some insurance. One very clear issue we had last year was puck movement aswell which only Chabot and Branny brought.Oh yah I get what you are saying. I just want someone better, He could be played there but Its not a long term solution. I think Sanderson will be the better player by mid season and will get better as the season goes on
What does this mean? I dont understand millennial.
I can see him being a useful guy to have for another year.definitely possible. I rather keep both and let them play it out so we have some insurance. One very clear issue we had last year was puck movement aswell which only Chabot and Branny brought.
I know Sanderson 'potentially' fixes a lot of those issues but unless a team specifically wanted Brannstrom for say Chychrun I rather keep them both
I am also of the camp that hamonic and Holden should not be playing 82 games on a roster that wants to make the playoffs
sign whoever is betterWeegar has one year left. I have doubts that we can re-sign him and Zub both.
Well jbd or thomson HAVE to be ready in their D+7 lolWeegar has one year left. I have doubts that we can re-sign him and Zub both.
Well jbd or thomson HAVE to be ready in their D+7 lol
Now he’s not officially an insider but still pretty well connected
Now he’s not officially an insider but still pretty well connected
Now he’s not officially an insider but still pretty well connected
If the Sens are trading a 1st in 23, it better be top 5 protected.
Top 10 hopefully. Anything less and I would be disappointed unless there isn't much else going back.If the Sens are trading a 1st in 23, it better be top 5 protected.