HSF
Registered User
- Sep 3, 2008
- 26,540
- 7,973
I am ready to get a Sens Giroux jersey. I actually think it would be the biggest seller this season in ottawaDorion's really going to make me buy NHL23, isn't he?
I am ready to get a Sens Giroux jersey. I actually think it would be the biggest seller this season in ottawaDorion's really going to make me buy NHL23, isn't he?
I've heard a few things about Brent Burns also.
Not sure he's really what we need.
In any event, 3 x 8M in cap hit but $16.5M in real dollars.
We have decided we don't need saves if we score a ton of goals.So I’m out of the loop. I assume we are going to run our current goalie tandem? I looked at the free agents and yuck. I will say I’m not a big Kuemper guy. Seems like a lot of teams have extremely weak goaltending though.
My stepdaughter is obsessed with cats, so I promised her a Debrincat jersey.I am ready to get a Sens Giroux jersey. I actually think it would be the biggest seller this season in ottawa
Burns could be a pretty good partner for Sanderson. I'd expect Sanderson to start off playing a safe, defensive minded game, and the offensive side will come later. His skating ability to to get the puck away from forwards could benefit Burns and Burns' size and the respect he commands could benefit Sanderson.
I think it's a pipe dream though. Odds are on Dallas.
Chabot - Zub
Brannstrom - Burns
Sanderson - Hamonic
Holden
this is nastyyyy
Honestly, I could warm up to a trade for Burns for the right price, but I have my doubts we're on his 3 team ok list.Going over to the Sharks board, they've narrowed in on Ottawa as the perfect trade partner for Burns. Seems like it's not a question of if he's traded, but when. He's apparently already working with Grier on a move. If we could only get him to waive to come here... that'd be unreal.
Brannstrom isnt a rookie anymore
Personally I think Sanderson will be more reliable defensively than Brannstrom as a rookie.
He's kind of a local guy, I guess? Maybe that works in our favour.Honestly, I could warm up to a trade for Burns for the right price, but I have my doubts we're on his 3 team ok list.
His contract is really affordable, we probably have to do some due diligence to ensure the cap implications don't bite us down the road, but only 3 years remaining, I think he can be a serviceable top 4 D for that period.Stay far away from Burns, please. He'll burn the team with his age and contract.
His contract is really affordable, we probably have to do some due diligence to ensure the cap implications don't bite us down the road, but only 3 years remaining, I think he can be a serviceable top 4 D for that period.
Personally I think Sanderson will be more reliable defensively than Brannstrom as a rookie.
I doubt that - it’s a big ask. Branny has developed a lot since his u20 days … I’m not even sure Sanderson will outplay Lassi in the fall.
I think his bonus this year is already paid, so closer to 4.3We'd be paying him an average of $5.5M a season.
And I'd be fine with that, but Methot didn't get traded for nearly the same package as what's rumoured for Chychrun, so why is the latter's asking price so much higher?Best comparison I’d have is Marc Methot who can put up 10 goals and 35-40 points.
As a Florida fan, I don't see how Weegar is traded here: everyone is talking about next year's cap hell without noting that this is a year that Florida can compete well. Hornqvist will be off the books and it will be easier for us to move Bob next season.Were really getting Giroux and Weegar aren't we