Proposal: Trade Rumours/Proposals PART XXXXII

Status
Not open for further replies.

Do Make Say Think

& Yet & Yet
Jun 26, 2007
51,454
10,270
If they want say Pinto/Grieg + 2023 1st (Protected) + JBD

Do we do that? Something in that range with Pinto/Grieg and the protected 1st being the cornerstone.
I am not sure I would, considering it sounds like there may be lesser but still good options to be had at a more reasonable cost of assets for natural RDs.
 

Hale The Villain

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Apr 2, 2008
26,812
15,459
Same old song and dance with you. There is no saying what we could have gotten for Brown at last years deadline, not a lot of contenders want to acquire term at that point. Brown would probably have the most value at this year’s deadline but it sounds like he is moving now.

Common sense.

Contenders would have loved to add a good 2nd line forward in Brown at a 3.6M cap hit for next season.

Coleman returned a 1st + recently first round draft prospect and Hagel returned two 1sts + more for similar reasons.

Brown's contract wasn't quite as good but we could have easily gotten a 1st + another nice asset. Now it might be a 2nd + nice asset.
 

SpezDispenser

Registered User
Aug 15, 2007
27,529
7,118
Also, you can bet McDavid is pushing for him since they played together in Erie. He knows how valuable a puck retriever like Brown would be on his line, compared to toilet paper soft Puljujarvi.

Combine that with Holland's timeline of probably 2 years... you might be able to get a great return.
Seriously, yeah. Not only that, but they did really well with the Hyman experiment, so adding another of his caliber would be looked upon fondly by McDavid and fans etc.

Brown fits Edmonton like a glove right now. I'm looking to talk to his agent if I'm Holland to see if there's ANY chance of an immediate extension, but I'm still very actively looking to trade Pulj for him plus a 2nd.
 

Gil Gunderson

Registered User
May 2, 2007
32,323
18,347
Ottawa, ON
I agree but I wonder if he would have more value traded at the deadline even if we are contending for the playoffs. Selling him to a team desperate could get us a late 1st next year. I am not sure what his value is right now to teams but if I was Dorion and didn't love the offers I'd consider holding out and doing it at the deadline.
Possibly, but there’s atill the risk of injury and his production is likely going down with Debrincat and possibly Giroux on the team. He’s not getting those same oppurtinities he had the last two years.
 

Mingus Dew

Microphone Assassin
Oct 7, 2013
5,636
4,196
I am not sure I would, considering it sounds like there may be lesser but still good options to be had at a more reasonable cost of assets for natural RDs.

I'm very on the fence about it. Chychrun is the best D man available but yeah he's going to be the most expensive by leaps and bounds.
 

DaveMatthew

Bring in Peter
Apr 13, 2005
14,507
13,180
Ott
Seriously, yeah. Not only that, but they did really well with the Hyman experiment, so adding another of his caliber would be looked upon fondly by McDavid and fans etc.

Brown fits Edmonton like a glove right now. I'm looking to talk to his agent if I'm Holland to see if there's ANY chance of an immediate extension, but I'm still very actively looking to trade Pulj for him plus a 2nd.

And if I'm Ottawa I balk at Puljujarvi and ask for either Xavier Bourgault or Carter Savoie.
 

Bileur

Registered User
Jun 15, 2004
18,816
7,693
Ottawa
So we've taken Formenton and Brown out and added Pulj. No merci

I’d also rather keep Formenton, I was just going on the premise that he and Brown had been traded as proposed by the post I quoted.

With Formenton, I’d bump Kelly out of the lineup and have Formenton on the 4th with Kastelic and Watson.
 

SpezDispenser

Registered User
Aug 15, 2007
27,529
7,118
And if I'm Ottawa I balk at Puljujarvi and ask for either Xavier Bourgault or Carter Savoie.
If I'm Holland, I say, you're taking Pulj. If you want Bourgault you can add onto Brown, if you want Savoie, I guess I'll take back the 2nd and make it Savoie and Pool. You can add in a 4th though.
However...I don't think he's that smart, honestly I don't.

EDIT, maybe no 4th needed from Ottawa

To Edmonton:
Brown

To Ottawa:
Savoie
Pool
4th
 

YouGotAStuGoing

Registered User
Mar 26, 2010
19,389
4,971
Ottawa, Ontario
I agree but I wonder if he would have more value traded at the deadline even if we are contending for the playoffs. Selling him to a team desperate could get us a late 1st next year. I am not sure what his value is right now to teams but if I was Dorion and didn't love the offers I'd consider holding out and doing it at the deadline.
Risk you run there is Brown getting injured and getting you no return at all, which'd be the worst-case scenario. Selling him here is the safer call, but I bet you're right that the return would be higher at the deadline for a player of Brown's skillset. Interesting thought experiment... not sure where I land on this one.
 

2CHAINZ

Registered User
Feb 27, 2008
14,994
21,120
Possibly, but there’s atill the risk of injury and his production is likely going down with Debrincat and possibly Giroux on the team. He’s not getting those same oppurtinities he had the last two years.
You're right. It's hard to know what the right play is and I don't want to use hindsight to dictate it. I don't envy Dorion's position atm tbh. If you lose Brown and you roll Joseph - Pinto - Formenton and they suck then what ? In a perfect world we keep him and still add players but obviously that's not possible. Maybe Dorion waits to see if he lands a big fish in UFA and if he doesn't then he keeps Brown and use him or Formenton in the top 6 to start the season ?
 

GCK

Registered User
Oct 15, 2018
16,657
10,869
Common sense.

Contenders would have loved to add a good 2nd line forward in Brown at a 3.6M cap hit for next season.

Coleman returned a 1st + recently first round draft prospect and Hagel returned two 1sts + more for similar reasons.

Brown's contract wasn't quite as good but we could have easily gotten a 1st + another nice asset. Now it might be a 2nd + nice asset.
I don’t know about that.

2 runs with Coleman at 1.8
3 runs with Hagel at 1.5

Vs

2 runs with Brown at 3.6

Is a big difference. Now if Melnyk wasn’t still around maybe we could have retained on him and hit a home run.

I think either way the lowest return on Brown will be this summer.
 

Sweatred

Erase me
Jan 28, 2019
13,408
3,326
I doubt Browns production is great if we acquire Giroux and he’s on a line with Pinto, Joseph, and Greig or whoever.

He doesn’t even project for PP2 time which isn’t great for his trade value or UFA potential. Probably why hes
Basically forcing a trade .
 

2CHAINZ

Registered User
Feb 27, 2008
14,994
21,120
Risk you run there is Brown getting injured and getting you no return at all, which'd be the worst-case scenario. Selling him here is the safer call, but I bet you're right that the return would be higher at the deadline for a player of Brown's skillset. Interesting thought experiment... not sure where I land on this one.
Ya I agree and understand I posted to Gil it's not a position I envy being in.
 

GCK

Registered User
Oct 15, 2018
16,657
10,869
I’d like to just go on record that retaining more than 33% and adding a 3rd to unload Murray is a massive overpay IMO. I’m afraid, very afraid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NB613

Alf Silfversson

Registered User
Jun 8, 2011
6,072
5,228
Hamonic is a wasted asset. We gave up too much and needed him for what exactly? Another bottom pairing defensemen like Holden and MDZ?

Dorion said he wanted to build his roster at the deadline so that players have the change to play with each other and used that as a reasoning to get Hamonic only for us to see big changes this offseason in said roster.

Hell i wouldn't be surprised if Tor is trying to unload Holl on us who is yet another bottom pairing guy who could probably be had for way less than we paid for Hamonic.

I would never have given up a 3rd for Hamonic at the TDL myself.

However, now that he's here he's the one to keep rather than Zaitsev who is signed beyond this year.

Hamonic is not a bad player. I didn't like the trade per se, but we have him now and he is much better than Zaitsev.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DrEasy and Cosmix

DaveMatthew

Bring in Peter
Apr 13, 2005
14,507
13,180
Ott
I would never have given up a 3rd for Hamonic at the TDL myself.

However, now that he's here he's the one to keep rather than Zaitsev who is signed beyond this year.

Hamonic is not a bad player. I didn't like the trade per se, but we have him now and he is much better than Zaitsev.

If they bring in a RD for the top 4, Holden-Hamonic is a very solid 3rd pairing. And if we were to be in contention for the playoffs, we'd probably be happy to give up a 3rd for a Hamonic-like rental at the deadline this year, if we didn't already have him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Alf Silfversson

2CHAINZ

Registered User
Feb 27, 2008
14,994
21,120
If you're annoyed by how long this is taking, because I know I am, just remember that Tierney is no longer a Senator.
Is it weird that late at night I don't use adult sites when I am lonely, I log on to capfriendly and just stare at this

0625hoj.jpg
 

Wondercarrot

By The Power of Canadian Tire Centre
Jul 2, 2002
8,389
4,376
I don’t think he’s the reason for that. I’m wait and see on Hamonic. I don’t care about his “good” play here nor do I care about his bad ply in Vancouver. Let’s see what he can do. I’m not optimistic though

If we land a legit top 4 D, then playing Hamonic as the 3rd pair RHD 15-17 min night I’d say makes our D extremely deep (while also being a poor use of cap space).
 
  • Like
Reactions: DrEasy
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad