Depending on whether details about alleged respective roles in the incident emerge, you could be right.
It's been discussed to death, but this is because there are merits to both sides of the equation.
Part of living under the rule of law is that we require courts and the rational review of evidence in order to punish individuals for crimes in our community.
While not guilty does not mean that you are innocent, it does mean that being charged with something shouldn't necessarily equate to losing your livelihood or being treated as guilty.
On the other hand, in a lot of these cases, where there isn't necessarily any physical evidence, it relies a lot on testimony and he said/she said situations do not necessarily result in adequate justice for legitimate victims.
There's no real right answer here, but what I do know, is that if Formenton does suit up as a Senator, there will be a vocal contingent of people who will demand that he never play hockey again.
These are the times we live in.
I don't envy the organization having to stick handle this situation.