- Apr 2, 2008
- 26,810
- 15,457
It reeks of this:
Ahh yes Andreas Englund. I believe it was either Murray or Dorion who said he had "generational character" and that was a big reason why they took him
It reeks of this:
The forces of the world at work.It's kinda crazy to think about how poorly this whole DeBrincat situation has played out...
1. Paid a massive price to get a small, scoring winger who typically don't bring huge returns
2. The player has a poor season
3. Team misses the playoffs
4. The player won't engage in contract talks at all, indicates he wants to test the market
5. No cap increase beyond the nominal 1M which makes also makes trades more difficult
Literally everything went wrong here.
Anyone that traded for him without an extension when Chicago was dumping him or didnt pay attention to the original contract he signed with Chicago was out to lunch. Here the sens are yet again with a devalued asset theyre selling at pennies to the dollar.They're always honest eventually.
Anyone who bought his bullshit about waiting for ownership to shake out was out to lunch.
How many of those does one GM get? I've been told I only get one per round of 18 and that I'm actually just cheating.No biggie, another Mulligan
Number 1 indicator was the original contract he signed. So blatantly obvious he wanted to test free agency.The forces of the world at work.
1. Known
2. Not that poor . Certainly not value caving poor
3. Predictable
4. Predictable
5. Predictable
If its your job the is your world. You have to consider every one of these factors. If you don't you could fail at your job.
It appears that way. Major miss by Dorion in this case and it really is unfortunate.Anyone that traded for him without an extension when Chicago was dumping him or didnt pay attention to the original contract he signed with Chicago was out to lunch. Here the sens are yet again with a devalued asset theyre selling at pennies to the dollar.
We should give our drafting duties to TSN 1200 callers.Ahh yes Andreas Englund. I believe it was either Murray or Dorion who said he had "generational character" and that was a big reason why they took him
I mean it was obvious from the moment he didnt extend him. I am not going to do it and go dig up some posts around the TDL. But there were some pretty nasty responses to me when I said they had to deal him. Alot of ridicule from posters saying they would get just as much or more for him now.It appears that way. Major miss by Dorion in this case and it really is unfortunate.
very Kumbaya. Yes as I take a sip of tea just brought in , it is.It appears that way. Major miss by Dorion in this case and it really is unfortunate.
Maybe. He definitely talks to much, but his moves have been either really good or horrific, some GMs just f***ed up completely, so if there's anything to take away from Dorion's final year, he at least built a solid core.I mean they really arent. He is a low character individual who lacks intelligence. Most other GM's arent the same as that.
How do you make the Duchene move then do it again. Its beyond incomprehensible.
Yes, appears the writing was on the wall the whole time. I don't buy anything about circumstances leading here, it obviously wouldn't have changed his intentions to hit UFA.I mean it was obvious from the moment he didnt extend him. I am not going to do it and go dig up some posts around the TDL. But there were some pretty nasty responses to me when I said they had to deal him. Alot of ridicule from posters saying they would get just as much or more for him now.
Might as well pour some whiskey in that tea to console yourself after seeing the likely return here.very Kumbaya. Yes as I take a sip of tea just brought in , it is.
I mean yeah he has some bad ones but this is the exact same thing as the duchene one in that he paid a hefty hefty price for a player that had no intentions of re-signing here. He has done that with a 4th OA pick and a 7th OA pick in a rebuild. Then ends up flipping said player for a late first or even potentially now a 2nd round pick. Bowen Byram turned into Lassi Thomson. Whats Korchinski going to turn into? Oliver Bonk?Fam not only that but he made the Zibanejad move again too.
Gustavsson, a young goalie who was showing potential, for a worse, older player, that they don't want back.
Dorion re-running his greatest hits.
Maybe. He definitely talks to much, but his moves have been either really good or horrific, some GMs just f***ed up completely, so if there's anything to take away from Dorion's final year, he at least built a solid core.
a nip is always nice.Yes, appears the writing was on the wall the whole time. I don't buy anything about circumstances leading here, it obviously wouldn't have changed his intentions to hit UFA.
Might as well pour some whiskey in that tea to console yourself after seeing the likely return here.
Which really good ones are there? Karlsson deal where the stutzle pick was pushed?.... He is missing 4 out of 5. He's terrible. Giroux signing here when he was going to no matter what? Every other deal has been a miss for the most part.Maybe. He definitely talks to much, but his moves have been either really good or horrific, some GMs just f***ed up completely, so if there's anything to take away from Dorion's final year, he at least built a solid core.
I'd been fired about a year into it, because I'd be much more aggressive. Stone would have been gone the minute we couldn't come to an agreement, NO WAY I'm waiting until the deadline.Ok Spez you are in charge.
You get
Karlsson
Stone
Duchene
Pageau
Hoffman
Ryan
Brassard
coming off a ECF appearance
You get to trade them all and ice a team that finishes at the bottom for , say 5 years and draft
I would bet you could do no worse.
a nip is always nice.
Devil's advocate for one minute: would Giroux have signed here if we hadn't acquired DBC? I wonder - and I'm serious. You don't just sign with your hometown team, you and your agent take a long, hard look. The DBC trade got the league's attention, did it push Giroux to sign here?Which really good ones are there? Karlsson deal where the stutzle pick was pushed?.... He is missing 4 out of 5. He's terrible. Giroux signing here when he was going to no matter what? Every other deal has been a miss for the most part.
Have you tracked who he follows?
Maybe we should ask Jordan Peterson ?
Anyone that traded for him without an extension when Chicago was dumping him or didnt pay attention to the original contract he signed with Chicago was out to lunch. Here the sens are yet again with a devalued asset theyre selling at pennies to the dollar.
I mean to be fair he did have some impressive qualities. And we didn’t have a 1st round pick that year. It was kind of predictable as we needed a big solid dman and he was one of the few around that pick.Ahh yes Andreas Englund. I believe it was either Murray or Dorion who said he had "generational character" and that was a big reason why they took him
Ok you may have even had the wherewithal to hire help and not be afraid he'd replace you.I'd been fired about a year into it, because I'd be much more aggressive. Stone would have been gone the minute we couldn't come to an agreement, NO WAY I'm waiting until the deadline.
Karlsson, I would have ended up with a shittier package because I liked Foote as a prospect.
Duchene, who knows...
I might have been Ok, but I'm betting on a year max before I was shot to the moon.