Agent Zuuuub
Registered User
- Jan 2, 2015
- 15,379
- 12,845
They arent the same thing at all. Giroux was a UFA, the team lacks depth up front and he doesnt have a history with the organization.
They would have to trade for Karlsson and they have their top 4 d men. This is Brady's team, Karlssons history certainly could impact the leadership group whether you want to acknowledge this or not.
I am interested in building a perennial contender. This teams best players arent even in their prime yet. Burning assets on Karlsson is extremely risky and counter productive to them actually winning a cup in 3 to 4 years when the core of this team is ready.
There is no Sidney Crosby, Malkin or Kane in this group. Why dont you look at the teams that have won recently. Colorado, Tampa, Washington, Vegas all these teams had to fail several times and all their best players are in their late 20's. You arent even looking at relevant comparables.
weak leadership if thats true.
guess its more important that the boys are having fun at the bars than winning. because Karlsson's history with the club is making it overperform and winning.
And the best part is you don't even have to burn many assets on Karlsson compared to his quality. Chabot or DeBrincat trades would both offset. In which case you're selling high and buying low, net positive assets AND your team gets much better.
And what all those teams have in common is they have multiple hall of famers. and you want to say no to a hall of famer because of Chabot or Bradys feelings?