Speculation: Trade Rumors/Speculation Thread Part VII: Shake Up

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Because you're not supposed to acquire these guys you're supposed to draft them or get lucky and trade for them when they're younger like the stars did trading for Richards from Tampa. Maybe the rangers should of got him then instead of seeing him work out for 2 teams thinking he'll do the same thing here at 31 years old

Richards also played with Neal and Eriksson in Dallas and that Stars team had better offensive players (Benn, Riberio)
 
Play seems to slip when guys sign big money contracts. Sather loves to hand out big money contract. Coincidence?

Big money + distractions = disaster.

It's the 2 of them combined. Why didn't Crosby's game slip when he got handed an armored van packed to the brim with hundred dollar bills?
 
Stanley cup was in 2009. Since then, they have been embarrased by Philly and Boston in the last two playoffs. Won't count 2011 because Crosby and Malkin were out.

And division titles? Come on. Washington has like, 4 gagillion of those. They mean squat.

So you enjoy watching a .500 team who hasn't won in 20 years? Give me a Stanley cup, division titles and a competitive team and I'll take it 10/10 times. Why are you defending the rangers? Like their brand of hockey isn't ****. Sather is garbage and this team will be mediocre till he's gone
 
I think it's more likely that most players are playing poorly, rather than all. All would be an odd phenomenon. Look at it the other way around. Colorado is playing well as a team, some players are along for the ride and collect points and plus ratings on the great play of others.

If Stepan, playing poorly shoots wide on a great Del Zotto feed, that reflects negatively on both because of one's mistake.

This is partially why I'm still thinking about whether or not to keep Richards.

That recapture may not be too bad in the long run. 6.66 mil for him is quite cheap at current prices. He could very well be on an 80 point pace on a team like Chicago right now.
 
Are there examples of a team giving a guy (let's call him "Dan Girardi") an extension and trading them away like a month later? Happens in other sports a lot but I can't think of a hockey example. It sounds...evil...
 
Ok maybe I can put it like this for you guys. Great teams surround their star players that they draft and get young with good/ok players to help them. The rangers get aging star players to help a team filled with ok players . You can't just plug these guys in and hope they gel. You draft them you get them young and surround them with guys like Callahan stepan Hagelin not the other way around
 
Ridiculous.

Someone will pony up for G as a rental but why in the hell would Ottawa do this?

Have you seen their defense? They like veteran leadership back there. They got Gonchar a few years back. Made a playoff run with him. They've lost most of their real leadership back there.
 
Yeah Pittsburgh has been great in the playoffs.

Due to needing a 23 man roster. Their defense and goalie **** the bed come april. Only true contenders have 4 lines, 3 defensive pairs and a legit #1 starter or a legit tandem in net.

We fall into having 2 good lines. 2 good defensive pairings and a superstar goalie. A lot to be desired. Need more pieces to the puzzle. Look at the current St. Louis Blues. They have 4 lines of hockey players. We lack that. They have 3 pairings too. Never do we have that. Always some issue. Whether it was stu Bickel being the 6th or some bum filling out the roster.

No team should add a player to fill out the roster. If you do that, the player will haunt you. We have too many fillers. Whether it is Pyatt, Pouliot, D Moore, Falk. They are given a role, but they were filled in due to lack of position players already and sufficient cap space to add to the roster. These are extra depth players, but they are given roles on this team they cannot handle through regression or whatever reason it may be.
 
So you enjoy watching a .500 team who hasn't won in 20 years? Give me a Stanley cup, division titles and a competitive team and I'll take it 10/10 times. Why are you defending the rangers? Like their brand of hockey isn't ****. Sather is garbage and this team will be mediocre till he's gone

Where am I defending them? I'm the conductor of the Trade Girardi and Callahan train.

There are different ways to build a winning hockey team. Sather has managed to find all the wrong ways to build a hockey team. We're soft, slow, and not skilled. That is a rare combination he has managed.
 
Have you seen their defense? They like veteran leadership back there. They got Gonchar a few years back. Made a playoff run with him. They've lost most of their real leadership back there.

So why wouldn't they just wait until the season is over?
 
Where am I defending them? I'm the conductor of the Trade Girardi and Callahan train.

There are different ways to build a winning hockey team. Sather has managed to find all the wrong ways to build a hockey team. We're soft, slow, and not skilled. That is a rare combination he has managed.

I don't care If you're the conductor on the polar express. You've had an argument for every post I've made today then manage to say what I've been saying like you're right and I'm wrong lol every fan knows this team has little to no talent and is poorly run by Sather so why argue? We have no first line we have a garbage bottom 6.
 
Where am I defending them? I'm the conductor of the Trade Girardi and Callahan train.

There are different ways to build a winning hockey team. Sather has managed to find all the wrong ways to build a hockey team. We're soft, slow, and not skilled. That is a rare combination he has managed.

At least lightning doesn't strike twice in the same place right? No chance he'll be able to pull this mistake off twice in his caree......

Wait a second.

NYR 2000-2001 squad.

Sather you animal, you.
 
MDZ is getting moved sooner or later.

Vigneault is about to lose his mind. He's throwing everyone under the bus. He's not happy.

A message needs to be sent to this group. Vigneault thought the prospect of someone close to the core would light a fire for them all to start playing at a high level. The players regressed.

My opinion is Del Zotto is gone by Christmas break, if not by the end of the week. Vigneault's first victim.
 
Also, now that Cally is out 4-6 weeks, someone needs to be added.

Pyatt and Poo have been given their chances. MDZ is a goner much sooner than later. He'll yield a top 9 winger.
 
I have a tough time believing DZ gets traded before Staal returns. But anything is possible, I guess.

What do your defensive lines look like without Staal and Del Zotto?
 
I don't care If you're the conductor on the polar express. You've had an argument for every post I've made today then manage to say what I've been saying like you're right and I'm wrong lol every fan knows this team has little to no talent and is poorly run by Sather so why argue? We have no first line we have a garbage bottom 6.

Your definition of a first line player is different than mine.

And I don't think anyone is arguing that we have a garbage bottom 6.
 
I have a tough time believing DZ gets traded before Staal returns. But anything is possible, I guess.

What do your defensive lines look like without Staal and Del Zotto?

McD-G
Falk-Stralm
Moore-McI

Yuck.

Would be fine with Staal back in.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad