Ail
Based and Rangerspilled.
so trading gaborik for 3 young players is now considered a screw the future 'let's go for the cup' move??
The Rick Nash trade was a "screw the future" let's go for it move. The Gaborik trade was an attempt to replace depth lost when trading for Nash and it was clear that Nash alone was not going to be them over the top. It's not like they moved Gaborik for picks and prospects. If Sather doesn't make the first "screw the future" move he doesn't have to make the Gaborik trade for those assets specifically.
Either way, is anyone here actually going to argue Sather is a sit on his hands and do nothing GM?