Wait, Nash IS a high draft pick.
Boston if anything were without a high draft pick really contributing.
If you look at it from the other side of the spectrum, how many percent of the top 3-5 picks has won the cup? Made the POs ever?
Detroit and Boston has won without core contribution from high picks, a few teams has of course won with them.
Do the right things. That's the best option.
You make your own bed:
-Turn McD into a Norris Candidate.
-Make Nash work. If not as a franchise player, as a goal scorer.
-Make those steals in the draft. Be better prepared than anyone else.
-Have the best development environment in the AHL in HFD.
-Get the best unsigned kids in college and Europe.
-Give us a top defense built around Hank.
And so forth. Being the best run org in the league beats just gambling on actual lottery tickets to turn out in NY.
Lol. 9 games played and 2 points.
9 games. He's been injured.
after watching the WC ... do I remember correctly when I think I read on the trade board Franson and Girardi had about equal value? Franson had more brainfarts in this one game than Girardi has in a year. Terrible.
Wait, Nash IS a high draft pick.
Boston if anything were without a high draft pick really contributing.
If you look at it from the other side of the spectrum, how many percent of the top 3-5 picks has won the cup? Made the POs ever?
Detroit and Boston has won without core contribution from high picks, a few teams has of course won with them.
Do the right things. That's the best option.
You make your own bed:
-Turn McD into a Norris Candidate.
-Make Nash work. If not as a franchise player, as a goal scorer.
-Make those steals in the draft. Be better prepared than anyone else.
-Have the best development environment in the AHL in HFD.
-Get the best unsigned kids in college and Europe.
-Give us a top defense built around Hank.
And so forth. Being the best run org in the league beats just gambling on actual lottery tickets to turn out in NY.
That he's injury prone.I know. He missed 32.
What's your point?
Why? They moved a ****** defenseman for another one. They're in the exact same spot.looks like leafs are out of DZ with Gleason trade
whats going through Lou's mind? probably the best GM ever, but he didnt pay Parise and handed Clowe an awful contract. Parise's contract is crazy but he didnt offer anywhere near what Minny was did he?
Comparing Apples and Oranges here.
Parise's contract was in another ERA CBA wise, with an owner who had no money, battling against a blank check, a friend in Suter, and his family's wishes to be home in Minny...(his wife and his actual family).
Clowe was a Clarkson replacement. Probably not the best contract ever, but it's been a few games. I'm thinking of it this way. The Clowe has played in the 3 games since his injury, the guy at least looks like he knows what he's getting paid to do (create space, hit, make room for his linemates which Henrique has come alive since Clowe came back - obv it's only 4 games, but it's a glimmer of hope)..Clarkson all season looks like he signed the big deal, lost weight, got a new wardrobe and won't be seen mucking it up anymore.
Clearly Clowe was a big risk, but if he stays healthy he is a factor and certainly the type of player we could use.
I just don't think that it is a given that Lou screwed up.
Clearly Clowe was a big risk, but if he stays healthy he is a factor and certainly the type of player we could use.
I just don't think that it is a given that Lou screwed up.
Pretty sure that has nothing to do with it.
Team has 3 main holes to fill for next year, by my estimation.
1) 2c
2) 1 rd
3) 2 rd
Assuming Richards is bought out, Girardi is traded/not resigned. Stralman is shifted down to 3 rd. We also need a 2 rw, but I'm assuming Kristo fills that need for us by next year.
Team has 3 main holes to fill for next year, by my estimation.
1) 2c
2) 1 rd
3) 2 rd
Assuming Richards is bought out, Girardi is traded/not resigned. Stralman is shifted down to 3 rd. We also need a 2 rw, but I'm assuming Kristo fills that need for us by next year.